About Management of Knowledge for Smartening Cities

• Autorzy: Jan Kaźmierczak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The paper presents the thoughts and methodological proposals of the author, aimed at the problems of urban knowledge management and changes in the stock of such knowledge, related to the implemented activities aimed at transforming the city into a smart city. The reason for the preparation of the paper was that the author identified several gaps in the discussed research problems.

Design/methodology/approach: As a basis for achieving the presented objective, the article uses the concept of stakeholder and the 5W+H model to show the assumptions for the proposed method of quantifying a set of tasks related to the functioning of the urban organism and the stakeholders whose knowledge determines the feasibility of these tasks. The theoretical scope of the article includes, in addition to the above-mentioned assumptions, proposals for using matrix projection to describe the involvement of individual stakeholders in area tasks, implemented in the city.

Findings: The result of the research described in the article is the identification of basic and hitherto unsolved problems of urban knowledge management, such as those arising from the lack of quantitative methods for assessing the stock of knowledge. In addition, the article indicates interesting directions for further research.

Social implications: The considerations presented in the paper are intended to increase the quality of processes dedicated to the transforming of city organisms into forms that are more feasible for final users (for inhabitants of smartening urban areas).

Originality/value: The paper shows a new approach to managing resources of knowledge in the process of transforming existing urban areas into smarter ones. The paper is addressed both to stakeholders of Smartening Cities and to researchers involved in this area of problems.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Smart city; Knowledge management; Stakeholders

PL

Inteligentne miasto; Zarządzanie wiedzą; Interesariusze

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 189 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary management
• Strony: 251--268

Twórcy

autor

Jan Kaźmierczak

• Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Afzalan, N., Sanchez, T.W., Evans-Cowley, J. (2017). Creating smarter cities: Considerations for selecting online participatory tools. Cities, 67(April), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.002
• 2. Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., Casteleyn, S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009
• 3. Anthopoulos, L. (2017). Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 63, 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005
• 4. Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., Reinsel, G.C. (2013). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control: Fourth edition. In: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619193
• 5. Caird, S. (2018). City approaches to smart city evaluation and reporting: case studies in the United Kingdom. Urban Research and Practice, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17535069.2017.1317828
• 6. Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., Savoldelli, A. (2016). Smart Cities Governance: the Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103
• 7. Chen, S., Liu, J., Xu, Y. (2021). A logical reasoning based decision making method for handling qualitative knowledge. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.11.003
• 8. Cholewa, W., Kazmierczak, J. (1995). Data processing and reasoning in technical diagnostics. WNT.
• 9. Chu, X., Sun, B., Huang, Q., Peng, S., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y. (2020). Quantitative knowledge presentation models of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM): A review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Vol. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101810
• 10. Coe, A., Paquet, G., Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900107
• 11. Cohen, B. (2015). Boyd Cohen: "The Smart City Wheel". The Smart City Wheel.
• 12. Dari, T., Fox, C., Laux, J.M., Speedlin Gonzalez, S. (2023). The Development and Validation of the Community-Based Participatory Research Knowledge Self-Assessment Scale (CBPR-KSAS): A Rasch Analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2022.2034478
• 13. Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4
• 14. Freeman, E.R., Evan, W.M. (1979). A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. Ethical theory and business, Vol. 3.
• 15. Gharib, H., Kovács, G. (2022). Development of a New Expert System for Diagnosing Marine Diesel Engines Based on Real-Time Diagnostic Parameters. Strojniski Vestnik [Journal of Mechanical Engineering], 68(10). https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2022.298
• 16. Hámornik, B.P., Juhasz, M. (2010). Knowledge sharing in medical team: Knowledge, knowledge management, and team knowledge. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2010-2.05
• 17. Hart, G. (1996). The five Ws: An old tool for the new task of audience analysis. Technical Communication, 43(2).
• 18. Hernafi, Y., Bouhorma, M., Ben Ahmed, M., Boudhir, A., Alluhaidan, Y.A. (2015). Clustering architecture for smart mobility control: Application to pilgrims in the great mosque in el hajj. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 78(1).
• 19. Jonek-Kowalska, I., Kazmierczak, J. (2020). Environmental expenses in municipal budgets in Poland in the context of aspiring to become a smart, sustainable city. International Conference on Geolinks, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, March 23-25, 2020. conference proceedings (pp. 35-46). Saima Consult Ltd.
• 20. Juarez, J.M., Riestra, T., Campos, M., Morales, A., Palma, J., Marin, R. (2009). Medical knowledge management for specific hospital departments. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.064
• 21. Karwot, J., Kazmierczak, J., Wyczolkowski, R., Paszkowski, W., Przystalka, P. (2016). Smart water in smart City: A case study. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference SGEM2016, Book 3, 1(SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-619- 7105-61-2 / ISSN 1314-2704).
• 22. Kazmierczak, J. (2024). How to Manage Knowledge Supporting Stakeholders of Smart Cities? In: G.F.P. Marquez, L.R.V. Sanchez (Eds.), From Theory of Knowledge Management to Practice. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/ intechopen.1003056
• 23. Kazmierczak, J., Loska, A., Kučera, M., Abashidze, I. (2018). Technical Infrastructure of "Smart City": Needs of Integrating Various Management Tasks. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering. https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2018-0059
• 24. Marrone, M., Hammerle, M. (2018). Smart Cities: A Review and Analysis of Stakeholders' Literature. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(3), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0535-3
• 25. Masalimov, K., Muslimov, T., Munasypov, R. (2022). Real-Time Monitoring of Parameters and Diagnostics of the Technical Condition of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle's (UAV) Units Based on Deep BiGRU-CNN Models. Drones, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6110368
• 26. Moniz, A.B., Grunwald, A. (2009). Recent Experiences and Emerging Cooperation Schemes on TA and Education: An Insight into Cases in Portugal and Germany. TATuP Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie Und Praxis, 18(3).
• 27. Olson, G.W. (1976). The Urban Organism. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000020003x
• 28. Paskaleva, K., Cooper, I. (2022). Have European "smart cities" initiatives improved the quality of their citizens' lives? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 175(3). https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.22.00013
• 29. Pinochet, L.H.C., Romani, G.F., de Souza, C.A., Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2019). Intention to live in a smart city based on its characteristics in the perception by the young public. Revista de Gestao, 26(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-06-2018-0077
• 30. Přibyl, P., Přibyl, O., Svítek, M., Janota, A. (2020). Smart City Design Based on an Ontological Knowledge System. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1289 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_12
• 31. Rahman, M.A. (2016). A framework to support massive crowd: A Smart City perspective. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshop, ICMEW 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEW.2016.7574679
• 32. Ramaprasad, A., Sánchez-ortiz, A., Syn, T. (2017). Ontological review of smart city research. Proceedings of the 23rd Americas Conference on Information Systems, July.
• 33. Salam, A., Dasgupta, A. (2021). Urban Waterways in Sustainable Development - Ensuring Cultural Tourism through Existing Heritage in Kolkata. Elementary Education Online, 20(1).
• 34. Santomil, D., O'Donoghue, D. (2016). Cathedrals in the Digital Age: a Case Study of Santiago de Compostela and Canterbury. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15640/jthm.v4n1a2
• 35. Shaheen, L., Ibrahim, M.A.A. (2021). The smart happy city. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 253. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC210431
• 36. Sharifi, A. (2020). A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. J, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101936
• 37. Simmie, J., Lever, W.F. (2002). Introduction: the Knowledge-based City. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, Iss. 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128336
• 38. Snis, U.L., Olsson, A.K., Bernhard, I. (2021). Becoming a smart old town - How to manage stakeholder collaboration and cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2020-0148
• 39. van Waart, P., Mulder, I., de Bont, C. (2016). A Participatory Approach for Envisioning a Smart City. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0894439315611099
• 40. Vasudavan, H., Balakrishnan, S., Jing, T.W., Vijay, K., Gunasekaran, S.S. (2019). Smart dashboards for smart city - A platform to engage with citizen. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2019.8308
• 41. Webb, R. (2007). The urban organism. Nature, 446(7138), 869-869. https://doi.org/10.1038/446869a
• 42. Wei, J., Chen, Q., Du, J., Liu, K., Jiang, K. (2022). Study on the Durability of Acid Rain Erosion-Resistant Asphalt Mixtures. Materials, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051849
• 43. Wiig, K.M., De Hoog, R., Van Der Spek, R. (1997). Supporting knowledge management: A selection of methods and techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(97)00019-5
• 44. Wilińska, A., Kazmierczak, J., Niesporek, A. (2012). Participatory approach to noise mapping and acoustic climate management. Proceedings - European Conference on Noise Control.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.189.17