Forging a Sustainable Path: Unleashing Collaborative Innovation to Expedite the Integration of Green Technologies in Supply Chains

• Autorzy: Chao Chen , Boonsub Panichakarn , Yafen Tseng
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The imperative for green innovation within global supply chains, driven by environmental concerns related to rapid industrialization, is widely recognized. Governments strategically integrate green innovation into economic plans to align growth with sustainability. However, complexities in adoption, such as relative advantage, compatibility, and government policies, remain. This study aims to comprehensively examine the adoption of green innovations within supply chains, addressing a notable gap in the existing literature. It focuses on elucidating the challenges associated with the adoption of green innovation within supply chains, emphasizing a proactive response to environmental challenges. Key factors, including relative advantage and compatibility, are explored in the context of challenges related to resource constraints and integration complexities. The study underscores the role of cooperative innovation in enhancing the attractiveness of green innovation adoption, with a crucial moderating influence attributed to government policies. Methods: A comprehensive literature review and quantitative research utilizing a questionnaire form the basis of this study. The research model evaluates factors influencing the willingness to adopt green innovations, encompassing external (government policy, competitive pressure), internal (collaborative innovation), and systemic factors (relative advantage, compatibility), with a specific focus on collaborative innovation. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 25.0 was employed to identify directional influences in the analysis. Results: The findings of this study reveal that both relative advantage and compatibility have a direct impact on cooperative innovation, subsequently influencing adoption intention through the mediation of cooperative innovation. Moreover, the study highlights a moderating effect of government policy on the relationship between cooperative innovation and the intention to adopt green supply chain innovations. Conclusions: By integrating the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) theoretical framework into the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model, this study addresses critical gaps in research on organizational-level innovation adoption. The conclusions drawn, along with theoretical implications and managerial recommendations derived from the statistical results, contribute to fostering the implementation of green innovation in supply chain management. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supply Chain Management (SCM); Sustainable supply chain; Sustainable development; Green logistics; Cooperation; Collaborative Innovation Networks (COINs)

PL

Zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw; Zrównoważony łańcuch dostaw; Rozwój zrównoważony; Zielona logistyka; Współpraca; Innowacyjne sieci współpracy

• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 133--147

Twórcy

autor

Chao Chen

• Naresusuan University, Thailand

autor

Boonsub Panichakarn

• Naresusuan University, Thailand

autor

Yafen Tseng

• Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Taiwan

Bibliografia

• AlBar A.M., Hoque M.R., 2019, Factors affecting the adoption of information and communication technology in small and medium enterprises: A perspective from rural Saudi Arabia, Information Technology for Development, 25(4), 715-738, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1390437
• Ali Abbasi G., Abdul Rahim N.F., Wu H., Iranmanesh M., Keong B.N.C., 2022, Determinants of SME's social media marketing adoption: competitive industry as a moderator, Sage Open, 12(1), 1-19, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211067220
• Arthur W.B., 1989, Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131, https://www.doi.org/10.2307/2234208
• Bai X., Coelho A., Lopes Cancela B., 2023, The relationship between green supply chain and green innovation based on the push of green strategic alliances, In Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Available on the Internet: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2619 (10/10/2023).
• Bocken N.M., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S., 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.097
• Bollen K.A., Stine R.A., 1992, Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models, Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 205-229, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002004
• Briggs N., 2006, Estimation of the Standard Error and Confidence Interval of the Indirect Effect in Multiple Mediator Models, PhD., The Ohio State University. Available on the Internet: https://search.proquest.com/openview/08adb30e3c3d0da6e9508f67c5e7a33e/1?pq-origsite=gscholarandcbl=18750anddiss=y
• Chen J.S., Kerr D., Chou C.Y., Ang C., 2017, Business co-creation for service innovation in the hospitality and tourism industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(6), 1522-1540, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2015-0308
• Chin W.W., 1998, Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16, https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537395
• De Jesus A., Mendonça S., 2018, Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy, Ecological Economics, 145, 75-89, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
• Fornell C., Larcker D.F., 1981, Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
• Ghosh M., 2019, Determinants of green procurement implementation and its impact on firm performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(2), 462-482, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-06-2018-0168
• Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., 2019, Multivariate Data Analysis, 8rd ed., Cengage, Boston, MA.
• Hausman A., Johnston W.J., Oyedele A., 2005, Cooperative adoption of complex systems: a comprehensive model within and across networks, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 20(4/5), 200-210, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/08858620510603873
• Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Huang Y., Han W., Macbeth D.K., 2020, The complexity of collaboration in supply chain networks, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 393-410, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2018-0382
• Ji H., Miao Z., 2020, Corporate social responsibility and collaborative innovation: The role of government support, Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121028, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121028
• Jimenez-Jimenez D., Martínez-Costa M., Sanchez Rodriguez C., 2019, The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 548-567, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2018-0019
• Kumar Bhardwaj A., Garg A., Gajpal Y., 2021, Determinants of blockchain technology adoption in supply chains by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in India, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1-14, https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537395
• Lai Y., Sun H., Ren J., 2018, Understanding the determinants of big data analytics (BDA) adoption in logistics and supply chain management: An empirical investigation, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 676-703, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0153
• Lê J.K., Schmid T., 2022, The practice of innovating research methods, Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 308-336, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935498
• Lee H., 2023, Drivers of green supply chain integration and green product innovation: a motivation-opportunity-ability framework and a dynamic capabilities perspective, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(3), 476-495, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2022-0311
• Li C., Zhang Y., Xu Y., 2022, Factors influencing the adoption of blockchain in the construction industry: A hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA, Buildings, 12(9), 1349, https://www.doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091349
• Liao S.H., Hu D.C., Ding L.W., 2017, Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 143-153, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.001
• Lin C.Y., Alam S.S., Ho Y.H., Al-Shaikh M.E., Sultan P., 2020, Adoption of green supply chain management among SMEs in Malaysia, Sustainability, 12(16), 6454, https://www.doi.org/10.3390/su12166454
• Lin H.F., 2022, IT resources and quality attributes: The impact on electronic green supply chain management implementation and performance, Technology in Society, 68, 101833, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101833
• Lisi W., Zhu R., Yuan C., 2020, Embracing green innovation via green supply chain learning: The moderating role of green technology turbulence, Sustainable Development, 28(1), 155-168, https://www.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1979
• Liu D., Cao J., 2022, Determinants of collaborative robots innovation adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical study in China, Applied Sciences, 12(19), 1-19, https://www.doi.org/10.3390/app121910085
• Liu Q.H., Liu E.L., 2016, Effects of relational embeddedness and innovative opportunity on intention to cooperative innovation [in:] Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Education, Social Science, Management and Sports, Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, 251-256.
• Luo X.G., Chen H.H., Zhan X.D., 2018, Impact of Collaborative Innovation Capability on Open Innovation in Enterprises: Based on Moderating Effect of Network Interaction, Technology Economics, 37(10), 66-72, https://www.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2018.10.008
• MacKinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., Williams J., 2004, Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128, https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
• Marei A., 2022, The effect of e-procurement on financial performance: Moderating the role of competitive pressure, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 855-866, https://www.doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.3.009
• Maroufkhani P., Tseng M.L., Iranmanesh M., Ismail W.K.W., Khalid H., 2020, Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises, International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102190, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102190
• Mohd Shariff M.N., Peou C., Ali J., 2010, Moderating effect of government policy on entrepreneurship and growth performance of small-medium enterprises in Cambodia, International Journal of Business and Management Science, 3(1), 57-72. Available on the Internet: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.762480798005161 (10/10/2023).
• Moreira A.C., Ribau C.P., Rodrigues C.D.S.F., 2022, Green supply chain practices in the plastics industry in Portugal. The moderating effects of traceability, ecocentricity, environmental culture, environmental uncertainty, competitive pressure, and social responsibility, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 5, 100088, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100088
• Najafi-Tavani S., Najafi-Tavani Z., Naudé P., Oghazi P., Zeynaloo E., 2018, How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity, Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
• Niesten E., Jolink A., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., Chappin M., Lozano R., 2017, Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 1-6, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085
• Rogers E.M., 2010, Diffusion of Innovations, Simon and Schuster, New York.
• Saunila M., Ukko J., Rantala T., 2018, Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 631-641, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.211
• Shahzad F., Du J., Khan I., Shahbaz M., Murad M., Khan M.A.S., 2020, Untangling the influence of organizational compatibility on green supply chain management efforts to boost organizational performance through information technology capabilities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 122029, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122029
• Sheikh A.A., Shahzad A., Ku Ishaq A., 2017, The growth of e-marketing in business-to-business industry and its effect on the performance of businesses in Pakistan: Marketing success, International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 178-214, https://www.doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2017.2704
• Taofeeq M.D., Adeleke A.Q., Lee C.K., 2020, Government policy as a key moderator to contractors' risk attitudes among Malaysian construction companies, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), 1543-1569, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2019-0192
• Tiffany A.W., Schumacker R.E., 2022, A beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed., Newgen Publishing, London.
• Tortorella G.L., Fogliatto F.S., Cauchick-Miguel P.A., Kurnia S., Jurburg D., 2021, Integration of industry 4.0 technologies into total productive maintenance practices, International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108224, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108224
• Wejnert B., 2002, Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework, Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 297-326, https://www.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141051
• Williams J., MacKinnon D.P., 2008, Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models, Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23-51, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758166
• Wong L.W., Leong L.Y., Hew J.J., Tan G.W.H., Ooi K.B., 2020, Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs, International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101997, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005
• Yalabik B., Fairchild R.J., 2011, Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation, International Journal of Production Economics, 131(2), 519-527, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.020
• Yu X., Lan Y., Zhao R., 2021, Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development? Omega, 98, 102116, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102116
• Zhang Y., Sun J., Yang Z., Wang Y., 2020, Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121701, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701
• Zhao X.X., Wen J., Zou X.Y., Wang Q.J., Chang C.P., 2023, Strategies for the sustainable development of China in the post-epidemic era, Sustainable Development, 31(1), 426-438, https://www.doi.org/10.1002/sd.2401
• Zhen J., Guo Z., Qu Y., Ren H., 2021, The Relationship between Intellectual Property Risk and Stability of Asymmetric Research and Development Alliance, Complexity, 2021, 1-12, https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2949067
• Zhou M., Govindan K., Xie X., 2020, How fairness perceptions, embeddedness, and knowledge sharing drive green innovation in sustainable supply chains: An equity theory and network perspective to achieve sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 120950, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120950
• Zhu Q., Sarkis J., 2007, The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance, International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00207540701440345

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.000984