Proaktywność klimatyczna jako czynnik wspierający regionalną konkurencyjność i odporność

• Autorzy: Urszula Bronisz

Warianty tytułu

Climate Proactivity as a Factor Fostering Regional Competitiveness and Resilience

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Climate transition affects many social, economic and political processes. With the green transformation and increasing climate change, the competitive paradigm is shifting toward greater impact of environmentally related factors. To improve the competitiveness, economic performance and resilience of regional units, appropriate climate change mitigation action and policy are needed. The strategy to anticipate and cope with the inevitable impacts under various climate change scenarios is referred to as climate proactivity. This paper attempts to describe regional climate proactivity in economic, institutional and social dimensions and to examine the differences in climate proactivity approach among European Union regions (NUTS 2). For this purpose, an original research model of climate proactivity, synthetic Overall Regional Climate Proactivity Index (ORCPI) and a typology of regions in terms of climate proactivity were developed. The result was a ranking of EU regions and a typology containing 4 groups of regions: leaders, progressive, moderate and lagging behind, into which all EU regions were classified. The survey revealed that Scandinavian regions are the leaders in climate proactivity, while regions from Central and Eastern Europe countries represent the largest group of regions lagging behind.(original abstract)

Zmiany klimatu wpływają na szereg procesów społeczno-gospodarczych. Wraz z zieloną transformacją i postępującymi przeobrażeniami klimatu zmienia się także paradygmat konkurencyjności, uwzględniający większy wpływ czynników związanych ze środowiskiem. Aby poprawić konkurencyjność, wyniki gospodarcze i odporność jednostek regionalnych, potrzebne są odpowiednie działania i polityka łagodzenia zmian klimatu. Strategia przewidywania i radzenia sobie z nieuniknionymi skutkami w ramach różnych scenariuszy zmian klimatu określana jest jako proaktywność klimatyczna. W niniejszym artykule podjęto próbę opisania regionalnej proaktywności klimatycznej w wymiarze ekonomicznym, instytucjonalnym i społecznym. Zbadano także różnice w poziomie proaktywności klimatycznej regionów Unii Europejskiej (NUTS 2). W tym celu opracowano: model badawczy proaktywności klimatycznej, syntetyczny wskaźnik regionalnej proaktywności klimatycznej oraz typologię regionów dotyczącą proaktywności klimatycznej. Wyróżniono 4 kategorie regionów: liderzy, regiony progresywne, umiarkowane i zapóźnione. Badanie wykazało, że liderami w zakresie proaktywności klimatycznej są regiony skandynawskie, natomiast regiony z krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej stanowią największą grupę jednostek zapóźnionych, doświadczających największych problemów.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Climate change; Competitiveness; Regions competitiveness; Pro-activity; Resistance to changes

PL

Zmiany klimatyczne; Konkurencyjność; Konkurencyjność regionów; Proaktywność; Odporność na zmiany

• Czasopismo: Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna / Instytut Geografii Społeczno-Ekonomicznej i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: nr 68
• Strony: 13--28

Twórcy

autor

Urszula Bronisz

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Alonso J.A., Garcimartin C., Kvedaras V. 2020. Determinants of institutional quality: an empirical exploration. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23(2): 229-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1719102
• Annoni P., Dijkstra L. 2019. The EU Regional Competitiveness Index. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2019_03_rci2019.pdf, 1-42).
• A Climate Risk Management Approach to Disaster Reduction and Adaptation to Climate Change; UNDP Expert Group Meeting. Integrating Disaster Reduction with Adaptation to Climate Change Havana, June 17-19, 2002.
• Antronico L., Coscarelli R., De Pascale F., Di Matteo D. 2020. Climate Change and Social Perception: A Case Study in Southern Italy. Sustainability 12(17): 6985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176985
• Arnout BA. 2022. Climate values as predictor of climate change perception in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Front. Psychol. 13: 1044697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044697
• Bhawsar P., Chattopadhyay U. 2015. Competitiveness Review, reflections and directions. Global Business Review, 16(4): 665-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915581115
• Boyer M.A., Meinzer M., Bilich A. 2017. The climate adaptation imperative: Local choices targeting global problems? Local Environment, 22(1): 67-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1160372
• de Coninck H., Revi A., Babiker M., Bertoldi P., Buckeridge M., Cartwright A., Dong W., Ford J., Fuss S., Hourcade J.C., Ley D., Mechler R., Newman P., Revokatova A., Schultz S., Steg L., Sugiyama T. 2018. Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response. In Global warming of 1.5°C: Summary for policy makers, 313-443. IPCC - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
• Cunningham R., Cvitanovic C., Measham T., Jacobs B., Dowd A.-M., Harman B. 2016. Engaging communities in climate adaptation: The potential of social networks. Climate Policy, 16(7): 894-908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1052955
• Darjee K.B., Neupane P.R., Köhl M. 2023. Proactive Adaptation Responses by Vulnerable Communities to Climate Change Impacts. Sustainability, 15(14): 10952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410952
• Engler A., Rotman M.L., Poortvliet P.M. 2021. Farmers' Perceived Vulnerability and Proactive versus Reactive Climate Change Adaptation in Chile's Maule Region. Sustainability, 13(17): 9907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179907
• Fazey I., Wise R., Lyon C., Campeanu C., Moug P., Davies T. 2015. Past and future adaptation pathways. Climate and Development, 8(1): 26-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.989192
• Grant P.R., Grant B.R., Huey R.B., Johnson M.T., Knoll A.H., Schmitt J. 2017. Evolution caused by extreme events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B, 372: 20160146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0146
• Heininen L., Exner-Pirot H. 2020. Climate Change and Arctic Security Searching for a Paradigm Shift. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20230-9
• Jiang Y.G., Zhang J., Asante D., Yang Y. 2019. Dynamic evaluation of low-carbon competitiveness (LCC) based on improved Technique for Order Preference by similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method: A case study of Chinese steelworks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217: 484-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.054
• Khan M.J., Roberts T., Huq S., Hoffmeister V. 2018. The Paris Framework for Climate Change Capacity Building. Routledge/Taylor and Francis, London and New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179094
• Karman A., Miszczuk A., Bronisz U. 2021. Regional Climate Change Competitiveness -Modelling Approach. Energies, MDPI, 14(12): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123704
• Ketels C., Porter M.E. 2020. Rethinking the role of the EU in enhancing European Competitiveness. Competitiveness Review, 31(2): 189-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-08-2020-0100
• Kizos T., Verburg P.H., Bürgi M., Gounaridis D., Plieninger T., Bieling C., Balatsos T. 2018. From concepts to practice: combining different approaches to understand drivers of landscape change. Ecology and Society, 23(1): 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09910-230125
• Kunapo J., Fletcher T.D., Ladson A.R., Cunningham L., Burns M.J. 2018. A spatially explicit framework for climate adaptation. Urban Water Journal, 15(2): 159-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1424216
• Kythreotis A.P., Jonas A.E.G., Howarth C. 2020. Locating climate adaptation in urban and regional studies. Regional Studies, 54(4): 576-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1678744
• McDonald K.S., Hobday A.J., Thompson P.A., Lenton A., Stephenson R.L., Mapstone B.D. 2019. Proactive, reactive, and inactive pathways for scientists in a changing world. Earth's Future, 7: 60-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000990
• Moldan B., Janouvikov S., Hunk T. 2012. How To Understand And Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators And Targets. Ecological Indicators, 17: 4-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
• Murphy B.F., Timbal B. 2007. A review of recent climate variability and climate change in southeastern Australia. International Journal of Climatology, 28: 859-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1627
• Ostrouch T., Sługocki W. 2018. Space and population - competitiveness determinants of countries in the age of globalization. Management, 22(2): 121-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2018-0027
• Patt A. 2012. Multi-level climate adaptation policy and causation narratives. Geografisk Tidsskrift - Danish Journal of Geography, 112(2): 174-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2012.742967
• Porter J.J., Demeritt D., Dessai S. 2015. The right stuff? Informing adaptation to climate change in British Local Government. Global Environmental Change, 35: 411-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.004
• Pyankova S., Troyanskaya M., Tyurina Y. 2021. Digital development and its impact on regions' competitiveness. Global Economy Journal, 21, 02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S219456592150010X
• Runhaar M., Mees H., Wardekker A. 2012. Adaptation to climate change - related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers. Regional Environmental Change, 12: 777-790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0292-7
• Rusu V.D., Roman A. 2018. An empirical analysis of factors affecting competitiveness of C.E.E. Countries. Economic Research - Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1): 2044-2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1480969
• Shalizi Z., Lecocq F. 2010. To Mitigate or to Adapt: Is that the Question? Observations on an Appropriate Response to the Climate Change Challenge to Development Strategies. The World Bank Research Observer, 25(2): 295-321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40891377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp012
• Schwab K. 2019. The Global Competitiveness Index. World Economic Forum, Switzerland (https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport 2019.pdf).
• Stiglitz J.E., Fitoussi J.-P., Durand M. 2018. Beyond GDP. Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307292-en
• Taylor A.L., Dessai S., Bruine de Bruin W. 2014. Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: A review of the literature. Climate Risk Management, 4-5: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.09.001
• Ulibarri, N., Ajibade, I., Galappaththi, E. K., Joe, E. T., Lesnikowski, A., Mach, K. J., Musah-Surugu J.I., Nagle Alverio G., Segnon A.C., Siders A.R., Sotnik G., Campbell D., Chalastani V.I., Jagannathan K., Khavhagali V., Reckien D., Shang Y., Singh C., Zommers Z. The Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative Team. 2022. A global assessment of policy tools to support climate adaptation. Climate Policy, 22(1): 77-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2002251
• Vallance S., Carlton S. 2015. First to respond, last to leave: communities' roles and resilience across the '4Rs'. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14(1): 27-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.010
• von Hedemann N., Breidenbach T., Carney C.P., Carr Childers L., David-Chavez D.M., Havrilla C.A., Hill M., Mahmoud H., Mueller N.D., Schultz C.A., Stevens-Rumann C.S. 2023. Climate adaptation research priorities and funding: A review of US federal departments' climate action plans. Climate Policy, 23(10): 1288-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2242313
• Zhang H., Geng Z., Yin R., Zhang W. 2020. Regional differences and convergence tendency of green development competitiveness in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254: 119-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119922
• Zilberman D., Zhao J., Heiman A. 2012. Adoption Versus Adaptation, with Emphasis on Climate Change. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4, 1: 27-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-083110-115954

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14746/rrpr.2024.68.03