Maintenance Resource Allocation - the Business Analytics Usage in Industry 4.0 Conditions

• Autorzy: Radosław Wolniak , Izabela Jonek-Kowalska , Wies Grebski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this publication is to present the applications of usage of business analytics in maintenance resources allocation. Design/methodology/approach: Critical literature analysis. Analysis of international literature from main databases and polish literature and legal acts connecting with researched topic. Findings: The integration of business analytics with condition monitoring technologies heralds a transformative shift in maintenance resource allocation. Through the utilization of real-time data from sensors and monitoring devices, organizations can craft dynamic and adaptive maintenance strategies. These strategies, grounded in the current equipment condition, strike a nuanced balance between preventive and corrective actions. Business analytics enriches decision-making by factoring in critical elements such as equipment importance, operational impact, resource availability, and budget constraints. This integration instigates a paradigm shift, fostering proactive, adaptive, and efficient resource allocation, resulting in heightened asset reliability, diminished downtime, and amplified operational performance. The evolving synergy between business analytics and maintenance practices is becoming integral to the future of asset management and industrial operations. The diverse applications of business analytics in maintenance, as outlined in Table 1, underscore its versatility, encompassing predictive maintenance, condition monitoring, asset performance management, work order prioritization, resource optimization, cost-benefit analysis, inventory management, and performance metrics monitoring. Concurrently, the adoption of advanced software solutions in Industry 4.0 conditions, exemplified by IBM Maximo Asset Management, SAP Intelligent Asset Management, and Fiix CMMS, reflects a commitment to efficiency and innovation in maintenance resource allocation. Despite the substantial advantages, addressing challenges outlined in Table 4, including data quality, integration complexities, implementation costs, and skill development, is crucial. These challenges underscore the necessity for a strategic and holistic implementation approach that considers technology, personnel training, and organizational readiness. In essence, the evolution of maintenance resource allocation through business analytics signifies a data-driven revolution poised to optimize current operations and position organizations for sustained success amid rapid technological advancements and the transformations of Industry 4.0. Originality/value: Detailed analysis of business analytics in the case of maintenance resource allocation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Resource allocation; Industry 4.0; Digitization; Artificial intelligence; Monitoring; Balance-sheet analysis

PL

Alokacja zasobów; Przemysł 4.0; Cyfryzacja; Sztuczna inteligencja; Monitoring; Analiza bilansu

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: z. 186 W kierunku przyszłości zarządzania
• Strony: 717--727

Twórcy

autor

Radosław Wolniak

• Silesian University of Technology

autor

Izabela Jonek-Kowalska

• Silesian University of Technology

autor

Wies Grebski

• Penn State Hazletonne, Pennsylvania State University

Bibliografia

• 1. Adel, A. (2022). Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1), 40.
• 2. Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A., Edinbarough, I. (2022). State of Industry 5.0-Analysis and Identification of Current Research Trends. Applied System Innovation, 5(1), DOI: 10.3390/asi5010027.
• 3. Aslam, F., Wang, A.M., Li, M.Z., Rehman, K.U. (2020). Innovation in the Era of IoT and Industry 5.0: Absolute Innovation Management (AIM) Framework. Information, 11(2), doi:10.3390/info11020124.
• 4. Bakir, A., Dahlan, M. (2022). Higher education leadership and curricular design in industry 5.0 environment: a cursory glance. Development and Learning in Organizations.
• 5. Cam, J.D., Cochran, J.J., Ohlmann, M.J.F. (2021). Business analytics: descriptive, predictive, prescriptive. Boston: Cengage.
• 6. Charles, V., Garg, P., Gupta, N., Agrawal, M. (2023). Data Analytics and Business Intelligence: Computational Frameworks, Practices, and Applications. New York: CRS Press.
• 7. Cillo, V., Gregori, G.L., Daniele, L.M., Caputo, F., Bitbol-Saba, N. (2022). Rethinking companies' culture through knowledge management lens during Industry 5.0 transition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(10), 2485-2498.
• 8. Dameri, R.P. (2016). Smart City and ICT. Shaping Urban Space for Better Quality of Life. In Information and Communication Technologies in Organizations and Society. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• 9. Di Marino, C., Rega, A., Vitolo, F., Patalano, S. (2023). Enhancing Human-Robot Collaboration in the Industry 5.0 Context: Workplace Layout Prototyping. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 454-465.
• 10. Dutta, J., Roy, S., Chowdhury, C. (2019). Unified framework for IoT and smartphone based different smart city related applications. Microsystem Technologies, 25(1), 83-96.
• 11. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2022). Smart Production Workers in Terms of Creativity and Innovation: The Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovations: Technology, Market and Complexity, 8(1), 68.
• 12. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R., Nagaj, R., Grebski, W., Romanyshyn, T. (2023). Barriers to Renewable Energy Source (RES) Installations as Determinants of Energy Consumption in EU Countries. Energies, 16(21), 7364.
• 13. Ghibakholl, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M.F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716-737.
• 14. Greasley, A. (2019). Simulating Business Processes for Descriptive, Predictive, and Prescriptive Analytics. Boston: deGruyter.
• 15. Herdiansyah, H. (2023). Smart city based on community empowerment, social capital, and public trust in urban areas. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag., 9, 113-128.
• 16. Hurwitz, J., Kaufman, M., Bowles, A. (2015). Cognitive Computing and Big Data Analytics, New York: Wiley.
• 17. Hurwitz, J., Kaufman, M., Bowles, A. (2015). Cognitive Computing and Big Data Analytics. New York: Wiley.
• 18. Javaid, M., Haleem, A. (2020). Critical Components of Industry 5.0 Towards a Successful Adoption in the Field of Manufacturing, Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 327-348, doi: 10.1142/ S2424862220500141.
• 19. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Haq, M.I.U., Raina, A., Suman, R. (2020). Industry 5.0: Potential Applications in COVID-19. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(4), 507-530, doi: 10.1142/ S2424862220500220.
• 20. Jonek-Kowalska, I., Wolniak, R. (2021). Economic opportunities for creating smart cities in Poland. Does wealth matter? Cities, 114, 1-6.
• 21. Nourani, C.F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Computing Logic: Cognitive Technology for AI Business Analytics (Innovation Management and Computing). New York: CRC Press.
• 22. Olsen, C. (2023). Toward a Digital Sustainability Reporting Framework in Organizations in the Industry 5.0 Era: An Accounting Perspective. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 557, 463-473.
• 23. Peter, G.S., Amit, C.B., Deokar, V., Patel, N.R. (2023). Machine Learning for Business Analytics: Concepts, Techniques and Applications in RapidMiner. New York: Wiley.
• 24. Scappini, A. (2016). 80 Fundamental Models for Business Analysts: Descriptive, Predictive, and Prescriptive Analytics Models with Ready-to-Use Excel Templates. New York: Create Space.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.186.51