Are There New Patterns of the Global Imbalance (From the Perspective of 2023)?

• Autorzy: Monika Andrzejczak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is to assess the validity of considering the global imbalances through the prism of imbalances in the calculations of the Current Account and the International Investment Position to investigate the impact of the crises on these values in the years 2005-2022. The research period has been broken down into the following sub-periods: 2005-2006 (pre-crisis period), 2007-2009 (Global Financial Crisis), 2010-2019 (inter-crisis period), 2020 (Covid-19), 2021 (post-pandemic recovery), and 2022 (Russian war). The countries have been selected from each of the following categories: the highest surpluses and highest deficits in the Current Account and the International Investment Position. The countries have been divided into research groups according to the criterion of the Current Account balance stability, understood as the value of the coefficients of variation based on the first differences of the Current Account balances during the inter-crisis period. The similarities and differences among the groups have been reduced to the assessment of average values of the Current Account and the net International Investment Position, the relationship between these accounts and the share of the Current Account balance in the creation of the GDP. The results have been summarized by presenting the correlation coefficients between the Current Account balance and net International Investment Position. The results indicate: (i) adopting the traditional global imbalance approach based on the calculations of the Current Account and International Investment Position is valid; (ii) the crises disrupt cross-border trade; (iii) there are connections between the variability of the Current Account balance and the specialization of a given country, geographical location and membership in international organizations. The study is based on WDI and IMF database. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Transaction account; International investment position; Crisis situations

PL

Rachunek bieżący; Międzynarodowa pozycja inwestycyjna; Sytuacje kryzysowe

• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Toruniu
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: nr 23(2)
• Strony: 1

Twórcy

autor

Monika Andrzejczak

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• 1. Alberola, E., Estrada, A., & Viani, F. (2020). Global imbalances from a stock perspective: The asymmetry between creditors and debtors. Journal of International Money and Finance 107,102-206.
• 2. Alexander, S.S. (1952). Effects of devaluation on a trade balance. Staff Paper 2, 263-278.
• 3. Allegret, J-P., Mignon, V., & Sallenave, A. (2015). Oil price shocks and global imbalances: Lessons from a model with trade and financial interdependencies. Economic Modelling 49, 232-247.
• 4. Andrzejczak, M. (2021). The impact of Covid-19 on the finances of multinational enterprises from the perspective of Balance of Payments transactions. In E. Mińska-Struzik & B. Jankowska (Eds.), Toward the "new normal" after COVID-19 - a post-transition economy perspective, 100-126. http://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-061-6/I8.
• 5. Backus, D., Cooley, T., & Henriksen, E. (2014). Demography and low-frequency capital flows. Journal of International Economics 92, 94-102.
• 6. Baldwin, R. (2013). Global Supply Chains: Why they Emerged, Why they Matter, and Where they are Going. In: Elms, D., & Low, P. (Eds). Global Value Chains in a Changing World. WTO Secretariat, Geneva,13-59.
• 7. Beirne, J., Renzhi, N., & Volz, U. (2021) Persistent current account imbalances: Are they good or bad for regional and global growth? Journal of International Money and Finance, https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jimofin.2021.102389.
• 8. Bernanke, B. (2005). The Global Saving Glut and the US Current Account Deficit. Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke at the Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond, VA, 10 March. https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/200503102/
• 9. Bettendorf, T. (2017). Investigating Global Imbalances: Empirical evidence from a GVAR. Economic Modelling 64, 201-210.
• 10. Bracke T., Bussiere M., Fidora, M., & Straub R., (2008). A framework for assessing global imbalances, Occasional Paper Series 78, January 2008, ECB.
• 11. Catao, L., & Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2014). External liabilities and crises. Journal of International Economics.
• 12. Cheung, C., Furceri, D., & Rusticelli, E. (2013). Structural and cyclical factors behind current account balances. Review of International Economics 21(5), 923-944.
• 13. Clarida, R.H. (2005). Japan, China, and the US Current Account Deficit. Cato Journal 25(1), 111.
• 14. Cooper, R.N. (2008). Global imbalances: globalization, demography, and sustainability. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, 93-112.
• 15. Coulibaly, D., Gnimassoun, B., & Mignon, V. (2020). The tale of two international phenomena: Migration and global imbalances. Journal of Macroeconomics 66, 103-241.
• 16. Curtis, C.C., Lugauer, S., & Mark, N.C. (2017). Demographics and aggregate household saving in Japan, China, and India. Journal of Macroeconomics 51(C), 175-191.
• 17. d'Albis, H., Boubtane, E., & Coulibaly, D. (2018). Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a "burden" for Western European countries. Science Advances 4(6), doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0883.
• 18. d'Albis, H., Boubtane, E., & Coulibaly, D. (2019). Immigration and public finances in OECD countries. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 99, 116-151.
• 19. Dix-Carneiro, R., Pessoa, J., P., Reyes-Heroles, R., Traiberman, S., (2023). Globalization, Trade Imbalances, and Labor Market Adjustment. The Quarterly Juornal of Economics 138(2), 1109-1171, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac043.
• 20. Djigbenou-Kre, M-L., & Park, H. (2016). The effects of global liquidity on global imbalances. International Review of Economics and Finance, 42. 1-12.
• 21. Domeij, D., & Flod´en, M. (2006). Population aging and international capital flows. International Economics Review (Philadelphia) 47(3), 1013-1032.
• 22. Forbes, K., Hjortsoe I., & Nenova, T. (2016). Current account deficits during heightened risk: menacing or mitigating? NBER Working Paper 22741.
• 23. Gruber, J., & Kamin, S. (2007). Explaining the global pattern of current account imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance 26(4), 500-522.
• 24. Habib, M. (2010). Excess Returns on net foreign assets. The exorbitant privilege from a global perspective. Working Paper Series 1158. European Central Bank.
• 25. Horn, G.A., Lindner, F., Stephan, S., & Zwiener, R. (2017). The Role of Nominal Wages in Trade and Current Account Surpluses. An Econometric Analysis for Germany. IMK Report 125e, Düsseldorf: Macroeconomic Policy Institute, Hans-Böckler-Foundation.
• 26. IMF (2009). Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual Sixth Edition, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.
• 27. IMF (2011). Oil Scarcity, Growth, and Global Imbalances. World Economic Outlook. April 2011, Chapter 3.
• 28. IMF (2014a). World Economic Outlook. October 2014, Chapter 4.
• 29. IMF (2014b). 2014 External Sector Report. IMF Policy Paper.
• 30. IMF (2016). 2016 External Sector Report. IMF Policy Paper.
• 31. Ito, H., & McCauley R.N. (2019). A key currency view of global imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance 94, 97-115.
• 32. Kelley, A.C., & Schmidt, R.M. (1996). Saving, dependency and development. Journal of Population Economics 9, 365-386.
• 33. Kollmann, R., Ratto, M., Roeger, W., In`tVeld, J., & Vogel, L. (2015) What drives the German current account? And how does it affect other EU member states? Economic Policy 30(81), 47-93.
• 34. Krueger, D., & Ludwig, A. (2007). On the consequences of demographic change for rates of returns to capital, and the distribution of wealth and welfare. Journal of Monetary Economics 54(1), 49-87.
• 35. Krugman, P.R. (2013). The Harm Germany Does. The Conscience of a Liberal, 1 November. .Received from: https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/01/the-harm-germany-does/.
• 36. Laursen, S., & Metzler, L. (1950). Flexible exchange rate and the theory of employment. Review of Economics and Statistics 32, 281-299.
• 37. Leff, N.H. (1969). Dependency rates and savings rates. American Economic Review 59, 886-896.
• 38. Li, W., Nie, G., & Wang, Z. (2020) Trade, FDI and Global Imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance 105,102188.
• 39. Li, Y., Chen, B., Li, Ch., Li, Z., & Chen, G. (2020). Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains. Energy Economics 92, 104-959.
• 40. Mendoza, E.G., Quadrini, V., & Ríos-Rull, J.V. (2009). Financial Integration, Financial Development and Global Imbalances. Journal of Political Economics 117(3), 371-416.
• 41. Obstfeld, M. & Rogoff, K. (1995). The intertemporal approach to the current account. Handbook of International Economics 3, 1731-1799.
• 42. Pettis, M. (2013). The great Rebalancing: Trade Conflict, and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
• 43. Reinhart, C., & Reinhart, V. (2009). Capital Flow Bonanzas: An Encompassing View of the Past and Present. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il, 9-62.
• 44. Servén, L., & Nguyen, H. (2013). Global imbalances: origins and prospects. The World Bank Research Observer.
• 45. Śliwiński, P., & Andrzejczak, M. (2019). Determinants of the current account balances in the 'old' and the 'new' EA countries from the perspective of the absorption approach in years 2005-2017. Roczniki Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Toruniu, 18(2), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.19197/tbr.v18i2.318.
• 46. World Bank (2021). Raport: World Bank. 2021. Global Economic Prospects, January 2021. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1612-3.
• 47. Xu, M., Allenby, B., & Chen, W. (2009). Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data. Environmental Science and Technology 43(9), 3378-3384.
• 48. Yang, H., Sun, Z., Xiao, Ziyan (2023). Global Imbalancs: Updating Mechanism Review and Descriptive Analysis. Procedia Computer Science 221, Elsevier, 1466-1473

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19197/tbr.v23i2.367