Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The aim of the article is to present the impact of behavioral factors on the increase in enterprise innovation, showing the cause and effect relationship between the enterprise's environment and the development of the pro-innovation attitude of its employees.
Design/methodology/approach: In the process of preparing the article, desk research and statistical methods were used. As a result of the analysis of sources, it was found that the issues of behavioral aspects of innovation are extremely rarely presented in scientific literature and mainly concern personnel management. Moreover, the basis for pro-innovation attitudes of company employees are behavioral models, social values and priorities created by the external environment. The use of statistical methods allowed to confirm this thesis.
Findings: During the research, it was found that the key factors that determine the creation of pro-innovation attitudes of society are the level of democracy in society, the development of civil society and the social responsibility of government institutions. Under the influence of these factors, social values, behavioral models, culture and attitudes of society members are created that contribute to the maximum extent to awareness of the need to transition from an industrial economy to a knowledge-based economy and contribute to the creation of pro- innovation socio-economic conditions.
Originality/value: Research results show that one of the key factors in increasing the innovativeness of the economy is the level of democratization of society, shaping civil society and increasing social awareness. It determines the reduction of the "power distance", the effective functioning of power institutions and spheres of socio-economic life, and, above all, the development of the education system, the level of which has a strong correlation with the innovativeness of the economy.(original abstract)
Design/methodology/approach: In the process of preparing the article, desk research and statistical methods were used. As a result of the analysis of sources, it was found that the issues of behavioral aspects of innovation are extremely rarely presented in scientific literature and mainly concern personnel management. Moreover, the basis for pro-innovation attitudes of company employees are behavioral models, social values and priorities created by the external environment. The use of statistical methods allowed to confirm this thesis.
Findings: During the research, it was found that the key factors that determine the creation of pro-innovation attitudes of society are the level of democracy in society, the development of civil society and the social responsibility of government institutions. Under the influence of these factors, social values, behavioral models, culture and attitudes of society members are created that contribute to the maximum extent to awareness of the need to transition from an industrial economy to a knowledge-based economy and contribute to the creation of pro- innovation socio-economic conditions.
Originality/value: Research results show that one of the key factors in increasing the innovativeness of the economy is the level of democratization of society, shaping civil society and increasing social awareness. It determines the reduction of the "power distance", the effective functioning of power institutions and spheres of socio-economic life, and, above all, the development of the education system, the level of which has a strong correlation with the innovativeness of the economy.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
433--444
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Kielce University of Technology
Bibliografia
- 1. Al-Essa, S., Durugbo, C. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Manag. Rev., 72, 1171-1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021- 00224-x
- 2. Al-Omari, M., Choo, L., Moh'd-Ali, M. (2019). Innovative Work Behavior: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, ISSN: 1475-7192.
- 3. Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., Bledow, R., Hülsheger, U.R., Rosing, K. (2018). Innovation and creativity in organizations. In: D.S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, H.K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology. Managerial Psychology and Organizational Approaches, Vol. 3. SAGE.
- 4. Baruk, J. (2006). Zarządzanie wiedzą i innowacjami. Toruń: Adam Marszałek, p. 90.
- 5. Bradley, F., Gao, Y., Sousa, C. (2013). A natural science approach to investigate cross- cultural managerial creativity. International Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 839-855.
- 6. Dahlman, C., Andersson, T. (ed.) (2000). Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy: Making the Transition. Paris: OECD, World Bank Institute, p. 3.
- 7. Drucker, P. (1994). The Age of Social Transformation. The Atlantic Monthly, No. 274, 53-80.
- 8. European Innovative Scoreboard 2018. EU Commission.
- 9. European Innovative Scoreboard 2022. EU Commission.
- 10. Frontline democracy and the battle for Ukraine. Democracy Index 2022. Economist Intelligence. EIU, pp. 7-11. Retrieved from: Democracy Index 2022 final (eiu.com)
- 11. Fryca, J. (2015). Stymulowanie rozwoju innowacyjności w przedsiębiorstwach - uwarunkowania behawioralne. In: J. Kotowicz-Jawor, S. Krajewski, E. Okoń-Horodyńska (eds.), Determinanty rozwoju Polski. Polityka innowacyjna (pp. 222-243, 442). Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne.
- 12. Harrison, R., Huntington, S. (Ed.) (2003). Kultura ma znaczenie. Jak wartości wpływają na rozwój społeczeństw. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
- 13. He, M., Lee, J. (2020). Social culture and innovation diffusion: a theoretically founded agent-based model. J. Evol. Econ., 30, 1109-1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020- 00665-9
- 14. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- 15. Hryniewicz, J.T. (2004). Polityczny i kulturowy kontekst rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: Scholar.
- 16. Makarczyk, W. (1971). Przyswajanie innowacji. Wrocław/Warszawa/Kraków/Gdańsk: Ossolineum, PAN.
- 17. Michalski, E. (2014). Czynniki determinujące innowacyjność przedsiębiorstwa. Handel Wewnętrzny, No. 6(353), pp. 78-87.
- 18. Mu Tian, M., Deng, P., Fan, R., Li, C. (2018). How Can Culture Affect Innovation? A Systematic Literature Review, April 2018. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 15506 DOI:10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15506
- 19. Oksanych, O. (2020). The company's innovative potencial and the strategy of its effective utilization. Przegląd Organizacji, No. 7. doi: 10.33141/po.2020.07.05
- 20. OSLO Manual (2018). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264304604-10- en.pdf?expires=1696360336&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=91E41252AB4B9782E 437688BD6A3CDCD
- 21. Paulus, P., Dzindolet, M. (2008). Social influence, creativity and innovation. Social Influence, No. 3(4), 228-247. Psychology Press, Taylor&Francis Group.
- 22. Porter, M.E. (2003). Postawy, wartości i przekonania a makroekonomia dobrobytu. In: R. Harrison, S. Huntington (ed.), Kultura ma znaczenie. Jak wartości wpływają na rozwój społeczeństw. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
- 23. Rawlings, B., Legare, C. (2020). The social side of innovation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, E175. doi:10.1017/S0140525X20000217
- 24. Soputan, G., Sumual, T. (2022). Employee' Innovative Work Behavior. November 2022. SHS Web of Conferences, 149(1), 02014. doi:10.1051/shsconf/202214902014 ICSS 2022
- 25. Worldwide Educating for the Future Index (2019). From Policy to Practice. The Economist Intelligence Unit, p. 6.
- 26. Yuan, F., Woodman, R. (2017). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995, 30 Nov 2017.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171690848
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.