PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2024 | nr 2 (226) | 133--148
Tytuł artykułu

"Carpe Punctum!" instead of "Carpe Diem!"-New Suggestions in the Analysis of Youth Opinions and a Research Case of a Possible COVID-Generation

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Typically, large sample cross-sectional youth surveys are survey-based, and their methodological background is widely recognized in the scientific community. This does not mean, however, that they are not subject to 'ontological' (i.e., inherent) question marks about their content and methodology or that they have become more questionable over time due to social change. In describing some of these question marks, we believe that we have reached the limit of survey-based research, where we can say that we need to go beyond questionnaires to describe reality. In this context, we are trying to outline a new agenda for youth research, then present the results of an integrated method in the context of a possible COVID-generation study. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
133--148
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • TK Centre for Social Sciences
  • University of Szeged
autor
  • Excenter Research Centre
  • TK Centre for Social Sciences
Bibliografia
  • Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from Home, Lessons from School: Influences on Youth Civic Engagement, PS: Political Science & Politics 36(2): 275-280, DOI: 10.1017/S104909650300221X.
  • Beck, U. 2008. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Bernstein, B. 1958. Some Sociological Determinants of Perception: An Enquiry into Sub-Cultural Differences, The British Journal of Sociology 9(2): 159-174.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1979. Public Opinion Does Not Exist, in: A. Mattelart, S. Siegelaub (Eds.), Communication and Class Struggle 1, International General, pp. 124-130.
  • Böcskei, B. & Német, Sz. 2021. Toxikus technokultúrák és digitális politika. Érzelmek, mémek, adatpolitika és figyelem az interneten. Napvilág.
  • Cantijoch, C. M., Cutts, D., & Gibson, R. 2018. Does mode matter? Measuring the effects of different types of online political engagement on offline participation, Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo 15(43): 206-236.
  • Castells, M. 2009. The Rise of the Network Society. Hoboken, NJ.: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Chapman, H. & Coffé, H. 2016. Changing Facebook profile pictures as part of a campaign: who does it and why? Journal of Youth Studies 19(4): 483-500.
  • Cook, J. 2016. Young people's strategies for coping with parallel imaginings of the future, Time & Society 25(3): 700-717.
  • Csutorás, G. Á. 2021. "Ratio Generationis"-Szempontok a felelős generációkutatáshoz, Metszetek 10(2): 104-126.
  • Cuervo, H., Wood, B. E. & Black, R. 2022. Fresh Understandings and Challenges for Youth Studies Research, Journal of Applied Youth Studies 5(1): 275-279.
  • Déri, A. & Szabó, A. 2021. Generációs kihívás a poszt-Covid időszakban, Szociológiai Szemle 31(4): 4-27.
  • Dessewffy, T. & Mezei, M. 2020. Fans and politics in an illiberal state, Trasnformative Works and Cultures 32. Available: https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/1757/2383.
  • Fekete, M. & Nagy, Á. 2020a. Q vagy Q?-Generációs válaszutak . Kultúra es Közösség 11(3): 63-68.
  • Fekete, M. & Nagy, Á. 2020b. Megszólal-e az új csendes generáció? Avagy mit várhatunk az Ifjúság 2020 adatfelvétel eredményeképp?, Szociológiai Szemle 30(1): 98-106.
  • Ford, S., Green, J. & Jenkins, H. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture (Postmillennial Pop). New York: NYU Press.
  • George, J. J. & Leidner, D. E. 2019. From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism, Information and Organization 29(3): 1-62.
  • Hung, A. 2019. Political socialization on Xbox Live: a sociocultural linguistic approach to adolescent identity, Journal of Youth Studies 23(5): 596-612.
  • Leonard, D. 2003. Live in Your World, Play in Ours': Race, Video Games and Consuming the Other, Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education 3(4): 1-9.
  • Leonard, D. 2006. Not a Hater, Just Keepin' It Real: The Importance of Race- and Gender-Based Game Studies, Games and Culture 1(1): 83-88.
  • Kiss, B. & Szabó, A. 2013. Konfliktus, generáció, identitás , Politikatudományi Szemle 22(4): 97-115.
  • Mannheim, K. 2000 [1928]. A nemzedékek problémája [The Groblem of Generations], in: K. Mannheim, Tudásszociológiai tanulmányok [Essays]. Budapest: Osiris.
  • McEvoy-Levy, S. 2017. Peace and Resistance in Youth Cultures: Reading the Politics of Peacebuilding from Harry Potter to The Hunger Games. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Molyneux, L., Vasudevan, K., & Gilde, Z. H. 2015. Gaming social capital: exploring civic value in multiplayer video games, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20(4): 381-399.
  • Mortensen, T. E. 2016. Anger, Fear, and Games: The Long Event of
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171690882

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.