Can the Internet Forget? - Rhe Eight to be Forgotten in the EU Law and its Actual Impact on the Internet. Comparison of the Approaches Towards the Notion and Assessment of its Effectiveness

• Autorzy: Aleksandra Gebuza
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main aim of the article is to provide analysis on the notion of the right to be forgotten developed by the CJEU in the ruling Google v. AEPD & Gonzalez and by the General Data Protection Regulation within the context of the processing of personal data on the Internet. The analysis provides the comparison of approach towards the notion between European and American jurisprudence and doctrine, in order to demonstrate the scale of difficulty in applying the concept in practice.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Personal data protection; Right to be forgotten; Judicial decision; Internet search engine

PL

Ochrona danych osobowych; Prawo do zapomnienia; Orzecznictwo sądu; Wyszukiwarki internetowe

• Czasopismo: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 9
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 86--101

Twórcy

autor

Aleksandra Gebuza

Bibliografia

• Carbone C.E., To be or not to be Forgotten: Balancing The Right to know with the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age (2015) 22 Virginia Journal Social Policy & Law.
• Cavoukian A., Wolf C., Sorry, But There's Online Right to be Forgotten (2014) National Post, <http://nationalpost.com/opinion/ann-cavoukian-and-christopher-wolf-sorry-but-theres-no-online-right-to-be-forgotten> accessed 29 October 2018.
• Claypoole T., Payton T., Protecting Your Internet Identity: Are You Naked Online? (Rowman & Littlefield 2017).
• Cooper E., Following in the European Union's Footsteps: Why the United States Should Adopt Its Own Right to Be Forgotten Law for Crime Victims (2015) 32 Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law.
• Editorial Board, UnGoogled: The Disastrous Results of the Right to be Forgotten Ruling (2014) The Washington Post, <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ungoogled-the-disastrous-results-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten-ruling/2014/07/12/91663268-07a8-11e4-bbf1- cc51275e7f8f_story.html?utmterm=.6427779f7d15> accessed 29 October 2018.
• Frosio G.F., The Right to Be Forgotten: Much Ado About Nothing (2017) 15 Colorado Technology Law Journal.
• Gregory S., Globalization and Social Protection: The Impact of EU and International Rules in the Ratcheting Up of U. S. Privacy Standards' (2000) 25 Yale Journal of International Law.
• Karen E., The Anglo-American / Continental Privacy Divide? How Civilian Personality Rights Can Help Reconceptualise the Right to be Forgotten Towards Greater Transnational Interoperability? (2016) 94 La Revue du Barreau Canadien.
• Kerr J., What Is a Search Engine: The Simple Question the Court of Justice of the European Union Forgot to Ask and What It Means for the Future of the Right to Be Forgotten (2016) 17 Chicago Journal of International Law.
• McCarthy H.J., All the World's a Stage: The European Right to be Forgotten Revisited from a US Perspective (2016) 11 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.
• McKay C., Free Expression, Privacy and Diminishing Sovereignty in the Information Age: The Internationalization of Censorship (2016) 69 Arkansas Law Review.
• McKay C., Privacy Law That Does Not Protect Privacy, Forgetting the Right to Be Forgotten (2017) 65 Buffalo Law Review.
• Powles J., Chaparro E., How Google Determined Our Right to be Forgotten (2015) The Guardian, <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/18/the-right-to-be-forgotten-google-search> accessed 29th October 2018.
• Preece C. et al, Google "Right to be Forgotten": Everything You Need to Know (2015) IT Pro, <http://www.itpro.co.uk/security/22378/google-right-to-be-forgotten-everything-you-need-to-know> accessed 29 October 2018.
• Rotenberg M., Preserving Privacy in the Information Society (2000) INFOethics98 <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000120452> accessed 29th October 2018.
• Rustad M.L., Kulevska S., Reconceptualizing the Right to be Forgotten to Enable Transatlantic Data Flow (2015) 28 Harvard Journal Law & Technology.
• Sandler R.S., Facebook Users are Still Sceptical After Mark Zuckerberg Finally Addresses the Cambridge Analytica Scandal (2018) Business Insider, http://www. businessinsider.com/facebook-users-still-skeptical-mark-zuckerberg-responsel-2018-3?IR=T accessed 29 October 2018.
• Solon O., Facebook says Cambridge Analytica may have gained 37m more users' data (2018) The Guardian,

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2019-0006