Warianty tytułu
The Future of the Institution of Marriage in the Opinions of Spouses in Long-Term Marriages
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
W Polsce, podobnie jak w innych krajach Unii Europejskiej, z dekady na dekadę ubywa małżeństw. Jest to spowodowane dwoma zjawiskami: malejącą liczbą zawieranych związków instytucjonalnych oraz wzrastającą liczbą rozwodów. W związku z tym należy zadać pytanie o to, jaka będzie przyszłość tej instytucji społecznej. Próbą odpowiedzi na nie są wyniki badań, których obiektem byli małżonkowie pozostający w długotrwałych związkach małżeńskich. Ogółem przeprowadzono 24 wywiady z osobami pozostającymi w związkach małżeńskich od co najmniej 25 lat. Respondenci z perspektywy własnych doświadczeń oraz decyzji dotyczących życia intymnego ich potomstwa wskazywali na cechy instytucji małżeńskiej, a także na zadania, jakie ta instytucja pełni wobec jednostek i społeczeństwa. Wypowiadali się również na temat przyszłości instytucji małżeństwa. Ich prognozy nie były optymistyczne. Małżeństwo, w ich opinii, jest instytucją, która wymaga wielu wyrzeczeń od partnerów, często nie dając korzyści, których spodziewają się małżonkowie. Współcześnie związek małżeński to alternatywa dla innych postaci życia osobistego, takich jak konkubinaty, samotne rodzicielstwo czy singlostwo. (abstrakt oryginalny)
In Poland, as in other European Union countries, the number of marriages is decreasing from decade to decade. This is caused by two phenomena: the decreasing number of marriages and the increasing number of divorces. Therefore, we should ask what the future of this social institution will be. An attempt to answer this question can be found in the results of research on spouses in long-term marriages. In total, 24 interviews were conducted with people who had been married for at least 25 years. Respondents, from the perspective of their own experiences and decisions regarding the intimate life of their offspring, gave their views on the characteristics of marriage as well as the role this institution performs towards individuals and society. They also commented on the future of the institution of marriage. Their forecasts were not optimistic. In their opinion, marriage is an institution that requires many sacrifices from partners, and it often does not provide the benefits that spouses expect. Nowadays, marriage is an alternative to other forms of personal life, such as cohabitation, single parenthood or being single. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
299--315
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Bibliografia
- Acevedo, B.P., Aron, A., Fisher, H.E., i Brown, L.L. (2012). Neural correlates of marital satisfaction and well-being: Reward, empathy, and affect. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 9(1), 20-31. https://www.clinicalneuropsychiatry.org/download/neural-correlates-of-marital-satisfaction-and-well-being-reward-empathy-and-affect/
- Amato, P.R. (2012). Institutional, companionate and individualistic marriages: Change over time and the implication for marital quality. W: M. Garrison i E.S. Scott (red.), Marriage at the crossroads: Law, policy and the brave new world of twenty-first century families (s. 107-126). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568.009
- Bachand, L.L., i Caron, S.L. (2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23, 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828317271
- Baker, M., i Elizabeth, V. (2014). A 'brave thing to do' or a normative practice? Marriage after long-term cohabitation. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783312462165
- Blair, S.L. (1993). Employment, family, and perceptions of marital quality among husbands and wives. Journal of Family Issues, 14(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014002003
- Carstensen, L.L., Gottman, J.M., i Levenson, R.W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.10.1.140
- Carter, J. (2017). Why marry? The role of tradition in women's marital aspirations. Sociological Research Online, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.4125
- Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
- Cherlin, A.J. (2013). Public and private families: An introduction. McGraw Hill.
- Eurostat. (2022). Population and social conditions. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Marriage_and_divorce_statistics
- Fenell, D.L. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15(4), 446-460.
- Ferreira, L.C., Narciso, I., i Novo, R. (2013). Authenticity, work and change: A qualitative study on couple intimacy. Families, Relationships and Societies, 2(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674313X668569
- Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
- Finkel, E.J., Cheung, E.O., Emery, L.F., Carswell, K.L., i Larson, G.M. (2015). The suffocation model: Why marriage in America is becoming an all-or-nothing institution. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569274
- Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2024). Narodowy Spis Powszechny Ludności i Mieszkań w 2021. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-stan-i-struktura-ludnosci-oraz-ruch-naturalny-w-przekroju-terytorialnym-stan-w-dniu-31-grudnia,6,34.html
- Hatfield, E.C., Pillemer, J.T., O'Brien, M.U., i Le, Y.-C. L. (2008). The endurance of love: Passionate and companionate love in newlywed and long-term marriages. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v2i1.17
- Hawkins, D.N., i Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84(1), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0103
- Hinchliff, S., i Gott, M. (2004). Intimacy, commitment, and adaptation: Sexual relationships within long-term marriages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504045889
- Jamieson, J. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Polity Press.
- Knapp, S., i Wurm, G. (2019). Theorizing family change: A review and reconceptualization. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(3), 212-229. http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/6916 https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12329
- Lauer, R.H., i Lauer, J.C. (1986). Factors in long-term marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 7(4), 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251386007004003
- Lee, K., Vasileiou, K., i Barnett, J. (2019). Lonely within the mother': An exploratory study of first-time mothers experiences of loneliness. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(10), 1334-1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317723451
- Lewis, J. (2003). Rec.: The end of marriage? Individualism and intimate relations. Albion. A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 35(2), 353-355. https://doi.org/10.2307/4054202
- Maatta, K., i Uusiautti, S. (2013). Love does not retire - Not even after a half century of marriage. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-206-8_5
- Maillochon, F. (2019). From tradition to personalization: Changing marriage norms in France since the 1960s. Population, 74(1), 41-70. https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_POPU_1901_0041-from-tradition-to-personalization.htm https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.1901.0041
- Morgan, D. (2011). Locating 'family practices'. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2535
- O'Leary, K.D., Acevedo, B.P., Aron, A., Huddy, L., i Mashek, D. (2012). Is long-term love more than a rare phenomenon? If so, what are its correlates? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611417015
- Orbuch, T.L., Bauermeister, J.A., Brown, E., i McKinley, B.D. (2013). Early family ties and marital stability over 16 years: The context of race and gender. Family Relations, 66(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12005
- Pahl, R., i Spencer, L. (2004). Personal communities: Not simply families of 'fate' or 'choice'. Current Sociology, 52(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104041808
- Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960-1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(3), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.2307/353333
- Przybył, I. (2017). Historie przedślubne. Studium socjologiczne przemian instytucji zaręczyn. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
- Schoenfeld, E.A., Bredow, C.A., i Huston, T.L. (2012). Do men and women show love differently in marriage? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1396-1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212450739
- Smart, C. (2007). Personal life: New directions in sociological thinking. Polity Press.
- Stahnke, B. (2023). To be or not to be: Advice from long-term spouses in a mixed methods study. The Family Journal, 31(2), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807221123555
- Tęczowe rodziny w Polsce. Prawo a rodziny gejowsko-lesbijskie. Raport 2009. Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171693479