Corporate Social Responsibility as a Source of Competitive Advantage - Strategic Contradictions in the Food Industry

• Autorzy: Adrian Peretz , Fred Strønen
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the eight decades since researchers started to explore the possibility that firms' responsibilities extended beyond the interests of shareholders, research on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has ballooned. The number of calls for more research on a steadily growing number of CSR-related domains has grown in line with the number of calls for businesses to behave responsibly. CSR has become a standard by which firms are measured, and compliance with CSR norms and regulations figures into firms' business decisions. Although many studies suggest that firms can combine profits for shareholders with benefits to stakeholders, the ultimate promise of CSR-that behaving responsibly can contribute to competitive advantage-has not been delivered. This may be because the complexities involved in creating competitive advantage require such a combination of singular focus and favorable circumstances that there is no room for competing goals. The main contribution of this paper is to show that even firms that successfully incorporate substantial and profitable CSR programs into core business activities do not envisage that such programs can contribute to creating competitive advantage. This study examines grocery retail chains that are answering calls for increased responsibility and sustainability by developing profitable food waste reduction programs. Although these sustainability programs increase profits for the retail chains and provide benefits to society, the chains do not see how such programs-or any other CSR initiatives-can contribute to competitive advantage. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Retail trade; Waste management; Competitive advantage

PL

Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; Handel detaliczny; Gospodarka odpadami; Przewaga konkurencyjna

• Czasopismo: Contemporary Economics
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: 18
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 171--191

Twórcy

autor

Adrian Peretz

• Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

autor

Fred Strønen

• Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

Bibliografia

• Abreu, M. C. S. de. (2009). How to define an environmental policy to improve corporate sustainability in developing countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(8), 542-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.625
• Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we knowand don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
• Aibar-Guzmán, B., García-Sánchez, I.-M., Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Hussain, N. (2022). Sustainable product innovation in agri-food industry: Do ownership structure and capital structure matter? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.100160
• Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9514-1
• Aras Berger, G. (2023). How competing institutional logics affect corporate social responsibility benefits: The Mediating role of paradox mindset and multi-stakeholders. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01131-0
• Ariely, D. (2007). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. IZA. http://deposit.d-nb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=985817305
• Aslaksen, H. M., Hildebrandt, C., & Johnsen, H. Chr. G. (2021). The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: Towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00063-9
• Bachev, H. (2013). Risk management in the agri-food sector. Contemporary Economics, 7(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.73
• Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
• Ben Amara, D., & Chen, H. (2022). Driving factors for eco-innovation orientation: Meeting sustainable growth in Tunisian agribusiness. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(2), 713-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00792-0
• Béné, C., Fanzo, J., Prager, S. D., Achicanoy, H. A., Mapes, B. R., Alvarez Toro, P., & Bonilla Cedrez, C. (2020). Global drivers of food system (un)sustainability: A multi-country correlation analysis. PloS One, 15(4), e0231071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231071
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer--company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 2004.
• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman; Harper.
• Brower, J., & Dacin, P. A. (2020). An institutional theory approach to the evolution of the corporate social performance - corporate financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 805-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12550
• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.35.66357
• Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-keys-to-rethinking-corporate-philanthropy/
• Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
• Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
• Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. In J. Weber & D. Wasieleski (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 39-69). https://www.academia.edu/37202985/Corporate_Social_Responsibility_A_Review_of_Current_Concepts_Research_and_Issues
• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
• Carter, K., Jayachandran, S., & Murdock, M. R. (2021). Building a sustainable shelf: The role of firm sustainability reputation. Journal of Retailing, 97(4), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.003
• Cassar, L., & Meier, S. (2017). Intentions for doing good matter for doing well: The (negative) signaling value of prosocial incentives (Working Paper 24109). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24109
• Chen, C., Jiang, D., & Li, W. (2023). Keeping up with the CSR Joneses: The impact of industry peers on focal firms' CSR performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01590-5
• Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412-1425. https://doi.org/10.1086/680089
• Chetty, S., Naidoo, R., & Seetharam, Y. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firms' financial performance in south Africa. Contemporary Economics, 9(2), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.167
• Chkanikova, O. (2016). Sustainable purchasing in food retailing: Interorganizational relationship management to green product supply. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1877
• Chkanikova, O., & Mont, O. (2015). Corporate supply chain responsibility: Drivers and barriers for sustainable food retailing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1316
• Claro, D. P., Laban Neto, S. A., & de Oliveira Claro, P. B. (2013). Sustainability drivers in food retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.02.003
• Cohen-Vernik, D., Pazgal, A., & Syam, N. B. (2019). Competing with co-created products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.11.001
• Corner, P. D., & Pavlovich, K. (2016). Shared value through inner knowledge creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2488-x
• Costa-Climent, R., & Martínez-Climent, C. (2018). Sustainable profitability of ethical and conventional banking. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 4.
• Crane, A., Palazzo G., Spence L.J, Spence L.J, & Matten D. (2014). Contesting the value of "creating shared value." Calif. Manage. Rev. California Management Review, 56(2), 130-153.
• Cunha, M. P. e, & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536
• Dam, L., Koetter, M., & Scholtens, B. (2009). Why do firms do good? Evidence from managerial efficiency (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1361937). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1361937
• Dat, N. M., Dai, N. Q., & Ngoc, P. B. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibilities (csr), entrepreneurship, and financial factors on the financial performance of the banks in ASEAN countries. Contemporary Economics, 16(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.479
• de Colle, S., Henriques, A., & Sarasvathy, S. (2014). The paradox of corporate social responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1912-y
• de Wit, B. (2020). Strategy: Process, content, context. Cengage.
• Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: An analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899149
• Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2016). Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 231-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-z
• Demirbas, A. (2011). Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2), 1280-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025
• Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
• Fiechter, P., Hitz, J.-M., & Lehmann, N. (2022). Real effects of a widespread CSR reporting mandate: Evidence from the European union's CSR directive. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(4), 1499-1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12424
• Fortanier, F., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR reporting. Management International Review, 51(5), 665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0089-9
• Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33(2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039403300202
• Frederick, W. C. (2006). Corporation, be good!: The story of corporate social responsibility. Dog Ear Publishing.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times.
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
• González-González, J. M., Bretones, F. D., González-Martínez, R., & Francés-Gómez, P. (2019). "The future of an illusion": A paradoxes of CSR. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-01-2018-0018
• Hadani, M. (2023). The impact of trustworthiness on the association of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on legitimacy. Journal of Management Studies, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12916
• Hinterhuber, A. (2013). Can competitive advantage be predicted? Towards a predictive definition of competitive advantage in the resource-based view of the firm. Management Decision, 51(4), 795-812. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311326572
• Hoffmann, J. (2018). Talking into (non)existence: Denying or constituting paradoxes of Corporate Social Responsibility. Human Relations, 71(5), 668-691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717721306
• Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17388
• Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
• Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
• Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013481016
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
• Johnson, P., & Harris, D. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative issues in research design. In Essential Skills for Management Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848605305.n6
• Khurshid, H., & Snell, R. S. (2021). Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms. Journal of Business Research Journal of Business Research, 129, 122-133.
• Kim, S. (2019). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers' CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1143-1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
• Kim, Y. (2017). Consumer responses to the food industry's proactive and passive environmental CSR, factoring in price as CSR tradeoff. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2671-8
• Kim, Y., & Bhalla, N. (2021). Can SMEs in the food industry expect competitive advantages from proactive CSR when CSR tradeoffs exist? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(2), 304-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2021-0019
• Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2022). Reflections on the 2021 AMR decade award: Navigating paradox is paradoxical. Academy of Management Review, 47(4), 528-548. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0251
• Maltz, E., & Schein, S. (2012). Cultivating shared value initiatives: A three Cs approach. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 47, 55-74.
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
• Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good...and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1866371). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371
• McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987
• Meier, O., Naccache, P., & Schier, G. (2021). Exploring the curvature of the relationship between HRM-CSR and corporate financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(4), 857-873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04332-3
• Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1278
• Mugoni, E., Nyagadza, B., & Hove, P. K. (2023). Green reverse logistics technology impact on agricultural entrepreneurial marketing firms' operational efficiency and sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100034
• Nickerson, D., Lowe, M., Pattabhiramaiah, A., & Sorescu, A. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on brand sales: An accountability perspective. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211044155
• Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: A legitimacy perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042
• Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2017). Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1399
• Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 409-444.
• Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A metaanalysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
• Poole, M. S., & van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562-578. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308389
• Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December 2006. https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value (2011). Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In G. G. Lenssen & N. C. Smith (Eds.), Managing Sustainable Business (pp. 323-346). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
• Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x
• Schrage, S., & Rasche, A. (2022). Inter-organizational paradox management: How national business systems affect responses to paradox along a global value chain. Organization Studies, 43(4), 547-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840621993238
• Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166188
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
• Stindt, D. (2017). A generic planning approach for sustainable supply chain management-How to integrate concepts and methods to address the issues of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.126
• Streimikiene, D. (2023). Use of nudges for promotion of sustainable energy consumption in households. Contemporary Economics, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.495
• Sun, Y., Xu, C., Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2022). What drives the innovation in corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures? An integrated reporting perspective from China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100267
• Timbate, L., & Park, C. K. (2018). CSR performance, financial reporting, and investors' Perception on financial reporting. Sustainability, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020522
• Vallentin, S., & Spence, L. J. (2017). Strategic CSR: Ambitions and critiques. In A. Rasche, M. Morsing, & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Strategy, communication, governance (pp. 63-85). Cambridge University Press. https://research.cbs.dk/en/publications/strategic-csr-ambitions-and-critiques
• van Doorn, J., Onrust, M., Verhoef, P. C., & Bügel, M. S. (2017). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer attitudes and retention-The moderating role of brand success indicators. Marketing Letters, 28(4), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9433-6
• van Doorn, J., Risselada, H., & Verhoef, P. C. (2021). Does sustainability sell? The impact of sustainability claims on the success of national brands' new product introductions. Journal of Business Research, 137, 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.032
• Velte, P. (2021). Meta-analyses on Corporate social responsibility (CSR): A literature review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00211-2
• Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2022). The paradoxical effects of communicating CSR activities: Why CSR communication has both positive and negative effects on the perception of a company's social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 48(1), 102134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102134
• Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9812-2
• Vishwanathan, P., Oosterhout, H. (J ) van, Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Duran, P., & Essen, M. van. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12514
• Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational Principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal Of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313-327.
• Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy Leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0070
• Wójcik, P. (2018). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A literature overview and integrative framework. Central European Management Journal, 26(1), 121-148.
• Wong, J. Y., & Dhanesh, G. S. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the luxury industry: Managing CSR-luxury paradox online through acceptance strategies of coexistence and convergence. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916669602
• Xu, R., Liu, J., & Yang, D. (2023). The formation of reputation in csr disclosure: The role of signal transmission and sensemaking processes of stakeholders. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129418
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition.). SAGE.
• Zhang, H., Ul Ainn, Q., Bashir, I., Ul Haq, J., & Bonn, M. A. (2022). Does greenwashing influence the green product experience in emerging hospitality markets post-COVID-19? Sustainability, 14(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912313

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5709/ce.1897-9254.532