WebGIS Open-source Platform for Localizations of New P2G Plants in Sicily

• Autorzy: Marcello La Guardia , Filippo D'Ippolito
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This research reports an error analysis of close-range measurements from a Stonex X300 laser scanner in order to address range uncertainty behavior based on indoor experiments under fixed environmental conditions. The analysis includes procedures for estimating the precision and accuracy of the observational errors estimated from the Stonex X300 observations and conducted at intervals of 5 m within a range of 5 to 30 m. The laser 3D point cloud data of the individual scans is analyzed following a roughness analysis prior to the implementation of a Levenberg-Marquardt iterative closest points (LM-ICP) registration. This leads to identifying the level of roughness that was encountered due to the range-finder's limitations in close-ranging as well as measurements that were obtained from extreme incident angle signals. The measurements were processed using a statistical outlier removal (SOR) filter to reduce the noise impact toward a smoother data set. The geometric differences and the RMSE values in the 3D coordinate directions were computed and analyzed, which showed the potential of the Stonex X300 measurements in close-ranging following a careful statistical analysis. It was found that the error differences in the vertical direction had a consistent behavior when the range increased, whereas the errors in the horizontal direction varied. However, it is more common to produce errors in the vertical direction as compared to the horizontal one.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Geology; Measurement; Servers

PL

Geologia; Pomiary; Serwery

• Czasopismo: Geomatics and Environmental Engineering
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: nr 18/4
• Strony: 5--25

Twórcy

autor

Marcello La Guardia

• University of Florence, Italy

autor

Filippo D'Ippolito

• University of Palermo, Italy

Bibliografia

• Jacobson M., Delucchi M.A., Cameron M.A., Coughlin S.J., Hay C.A., Manogaran I.P., Shu Y., von Krauland A.-K.: Impacts of Green New Deal Energy plans on grid stability, costs, jobs, health, and climate in 143 countries. One Earth, vol. 1(4), 2019, pp. 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.003.
• Simonis B., Newborough M.: Sizing and operating power-to-gas systems to absorb excess renewable electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42(34), 2019, pp. 21635-21647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.121.
• McDonagh S., O'Shea R., Wall D., Deane J., Murphy J.: Modelling of a powerto-gas system to predict the levelised cost of energy of an advanced renewable gaseous transport fuel. Applied Energy, vol. 215, 2018, pp.444-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.019.
• Thema M., Bauer F., Sterner M.: Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 112, 2019, pp. 775-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030.
• Götz M., Lefebvre J., Mörs F., McDaniel Koch A., Graf F., Bajohr S., Reimert R., Kolb T.: Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review. Renewable Energy, vol. 85, 2016, pp. 1371-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066.
• Varone A., Ferrari M.: Power to liquid and power to gas: An option for the German Energiewende. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 45, 2015, pp. 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.049.
• Wulf C., Linßen J., Zapp P.: Review of Power-to-Gas projects in Europe. Energy Procedia, vol. 155, 2018, pp. 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.041.
• Mazza A., Bompard E., Chicco G.: Applications of power to gas technologies in emerging electrical systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, 2018, pp. 794-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.072.
• Malczewski J.: GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, vol. 62(1), 2004, pp. 3-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002.
• Bubbico R., Di Cave S., Mazzarotta B.: Risk analysis for road and rail transport of hazardous materials: A GIS approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 17(6), 2004, pp. 483-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.011.
• Riccioli F., El Asmar T.: GIS Technique for Territorial Analysis. [in:] Andreopoulou Z., Manos B., Polman N., Viaggi D. (eds.), Agricultural and Environmental Informatics, Governance and Management: Emerging Research Applications, IGI Global, Hershey 2011, pp. 425-445. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-621-3.ch022.
• Valenti F., Porto S., Chinnici G., Cascone G., Arcidiacono C.: A GIS-based model to estimate citrus pulp availability for biogas production: An application to a region of the Mediterranean Basin. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, vol. 10(6), 2016, pp. 710-727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1707.
• Castelluccio F., D'Orso G., Migliore M., Scianna A.: GIS Infomobility for Travellers. [in:] Gervasi O., Murgante B., Misra S., Rocha A.M.A.C., Torre C.M., Taniar D., Apduhan B.O., Stankova E., Wang S. (eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2016: 16th International Conference, Beijing, China, July 4-7, 2016: Proceedings: Part III, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9788, Springer, Cham 2016, pp. 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_41.
• Gahleitner G.: Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38(5), 2013, pp. 2039-2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.010.
• Balla D., Zichar M., Kiss E., Szabó G., Mester T.: Possibilities for assessment and geovisualization of spatial and temporal water quality data using a WebGIS application. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 11(2), 2022, 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020108.
• Patera A., Pataki Z., Kitsiou D.: Development of a WebGIS application to assess conflicting activities in the framework of marine spatial planning. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 10(3), 2022, 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10030389.
• Scianna A., Gaglio G., La Guardia M., Nuccio G.: Development of a virtual CH path on WEB: Integration of a GIS, VR, and other multimedia data. [in:] Ioannides M., Fink E., Cantoni L., Champion E. (eds.), Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection: 8th International Conference, EuroMed 2020, Virtual Event, November 2-5, 2020: Revised Selected Paper, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12642, Springer, Cham 2021, pp. 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_15.
• Vacca G., Fiorino D., Pili D.: A Spatial Information System (SIS) for the architectural and cultural heritage of Sardinia (Italy). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 7(2), 2018, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7020049.
• Capolupo A., Monterisi C., Saponieri A., Addona F., Damiani L., Archetti R., Tarantino E.: An interactive WebGIS framework for coastal erosion risk management. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 9(6), 2021, 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060567.
• La Guardia M., Koeva M., D'Ippolito F., Karam S.: 3D data integration for web based open source WebGL interactive visualisation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLVIII-4/W4-2022, 2022, pp. 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-89-2022.
• Toro Herrera J.F., Carrion D., Brovelli M.A.: A collaborative platform for water quality monitoring: Simile WebGIS. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLIII-B4-2021, 2021, pp. 201-207. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-201-2021.
• Suni Y.P.K., Sujono J., Istiarto: Identifying potential sites for rainwater harvesting ponds (embung) in Indonesia's semi-arid region using GIS-based MCA techniques and satellite rainfall data. PLOS ONE, vol. 18(6), 2023, e0286061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286061.
• Aziz S.F., Abdulrahman K.Z., Ali S.S., Karakouzian M.: Water harvesting in the Garmian Region (Kurdistan, Iraq) using GIS and remote sensing. Water, vol. 15(3), 2023, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030507.
• Ahmed M.S., Mahmoud N., Manabu F., Chihiro Y., Mona G.I.: Delineating suitable zones for solar-based groundwater exploitation using multi-criteria analysis: A techno-economic assessment for meeting sustainable development goals (SDGs). Groundwater for Sustainable Development, vol. 25, 2024, 101087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101087.
• Gahalod N.S.S., Rajeev K., Pant P.K., Binjola S., Yadav R.L., Meena R.L.: Spatial assessment of flood vulnerability and waterlogging extent in agricultural lands using RS-GIS and AHP technique - a case study of Patan district Gujarat, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 196, 2024, 338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12482-9.
• Mikias B.M.: Potential landfill site selection for solid waste disposal using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in Yirgalem Town, Ethiopia. Cogent Engineering, vol. 11(1), 2024, 2297486. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2297486.
• Giallanza A., Porretto M., Puma G., Marannano G.: A sizing approach for standalone hybrid photovoltaic-wind-battery systems: A Sicilian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 199, 2018, pp. 817-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.223.
• La Guardia M., D'Ippolito F., Cellura M.: Construction of a WebGIS tool based on a GIS semiautomated processing for the localization of P2G plants in Sicily (Italy). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 10(10), 2021, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100671.
• La Guardia M., D'Ippolito F., Cellura M.: A GIS-based optimization model finalized to the localization of new power-to-gas plants: The case study of Sicily (Italy). Renewable Energy, vol. 197, 2022, pp. 828-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.120
• Grippa T., Lennert M., Beaumont B., Vanhuysse S., Stephenne N., Wolff E.: An open-source semi-automated processing chain for urban object-based classification. Remote Sensing, vol. 9(4), 2017, 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040358.
• Neteler M., Bowman M., Landa M., Metz M.: GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS. Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 31, 2012, pp. 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014.
• Neteler M., Beaudette D., Cavallini P., Lami L., Cepicky J.: GRASS GIS. [in:] Hall B.G., Leahy M.G. (eds.), Open Source Approaches in Spatial Data Handling, Advances in Geographic Information Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2008, pp. 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74831-1_9.
• Coetzee S., Ivánová I., Mitasova H., Brovelli M.: Open geospatial software and data: A review of the current state and a perspective into the future. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 9(2), 2020, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020090.
• Mishra S., Chander S., Pradhan R., Dubey A.K., Oza M.P., Sharma S.A.: WebGIS for water level monitoring and flood forecasting using Open Source Technology. Journal of Geomatics, vol. 14(1), 2020, pp. 49-54.
• Can R., Kocaman S., Ok A.: A WebGIS framework for semi-automated geodatabase updating assisted by deep learning. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLIII-B5-2021, 2021, pp. 13-19. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2021-13-2021.
• Menegon S., Depellegrin D., Farella G., Sarretta A., Venier C., Barbanti A.: Addressing cumulative effects, maritime conflicts and ecosystem services threats through MSP-oriented geospatial webtools. Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 163, 2018, pp. 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.07.009.
• Woo H., Acuna M., Moroni M., Taskhiri M., Turner P.: Optimizing the location of biomass energy facilities by integrating Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Forests, vol. 9(10), 2018, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100585.
• Tahvanainen T., Anttila P.: Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 35(8), 2011, pp. 3360-3375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.014.
• Al-Kurdi N., Pillot B., Gervet C., Linguet L.: Towards robust scenarios of spatio-temporal renewable energy planning: A GIS-RO approach. [in:] Schiex T., de Givry S. (eds.), Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming: 25th International Conference, CP 2019: Stamford, CT, USA, September 30 - October 4, 2019: Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11802, Springer, Cham 2019, pp. 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_42.
• Al Garni H.Z., Awasthi A.: Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy, vol. 206, 2017, pp. 1225-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024.
• Kocabaldır C., Yücel M.A.: GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis for spatial planning of solar photovoltaic power plants in Çanakkale province, Turkey. Renewable Energy, vol. 212, 2023, pp. 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.075.
• Sánchez-Lozano J.M., Henggeler Antunes C., García-Cascales M.S., Dias L.: GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: Evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain. Renewable Energy, vol. 66, 2014, pp. 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.038.
• Islam Md. R., Aziz Md. T., Alauddin M., Kader Z., Islam Md. R.: Site suitability assessment for solar power plants in Bangladesh: A GIS-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. Renewable Energy, vol. 220, 2024, 119595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119595.
• Meng S., Yuanxu Z., Jinwei S., Zhixin H., Zhuxiao S.: A decision framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on GIS-MCDM: A case study in China. Energy, vol. 262(part B), 2023, 125476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125476.
• Almasad A., Pavlak G., Alquthami T., Kumara S.: Site suitability analysis for implementing solar PV power plants using GIS and fuzzy MCDM based approach. Solar Energy, vol. 249, 2023, pp. 642-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.046.
• Asadi M., Pourhossein K., Noorollahi Y., Marzband M., Iglesias G.: A new decision framework for hybrid solar and wind power plant site selection using linear regression modeling based on GIS-AHP. Sustainability, vol. 15(10), 2023, 8359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108359.
• Şahin G., Koç A., van Sark W.: Multi-criteria decision making for solar power - Wind power plant site selection using a GIS-intuitionistic fuzzy-based approach with an application in the Netherlands. Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 51, 2024, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101307.
• Vosgerau H., Mathiesen A., Sparre Andersen M., Boldreel L., Hjuler M., Kamla E., Kristensen L., Brogaard Pedersen C., Pjetursson B., Nielsen L.: A WebGIS portal for exploration of deep geothermal energy based on geological and geophysical data. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin, vol. 35, 2016, pp. 23-26. https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v35.4633.
• Maffeis G., Roncolato D., Cherubini A., Bernardoni A., Boccardi S., Greco A., Chiesa A., Brolis M., Fasano M.: BIOPOLE: WebGIS-based Decision Support System (DSS) in bio-energy plant localization. [in:] Seppelt R., Voinov A.A., Lange S., Bankamp D. (eds.), Managing Resources of a Limited Planet. Pathways and Visions under Uncertainty: 6th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs), 1 - 5 July 2012, Leipzig, Germany, International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), Leipzig 2012. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2012/Stream-B/278/ [access: 21.03.2024].
• Pasanisi F., Righini G., D'Isidoro M., Vitali L., Briganti G., Grauso S., Moretti L., Tebano C., Zanini G., Mahahabisa M., Letamai M., Raliselo, Seitlheko M.: A cooperation project in Lesotho: Renewable energy potential maps embedded in a WebGIS tool. Sustainability, vol. 13(18), 2021, 10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810132.
• Raffler C.: QNEAT3: QGIS Network Analysis Toolbox. https://root676.github.io/ [access: 21.03.2024].
• Goraj R., Kiciński M., Ślefarski R., Duczkowska A.: Validity of decision criteria for selecting power-to-gas projects in Poland. Utilities Policy, vol. 83, 2023, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101619.
• Ozturk M., Dincer I.: A comprehensive review on power-to-gas with hydrogen options for cleaner applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46(62), 2021, pp. 31511-31522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.066.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/geom.2024.18.4.5