Improving Business Processes at mBank - Case Study on "Return Disposition Management" Process

• Autorzy: Magdalena Toporowska , Piotr Mańkowski , Agnieszka Jadczyszyn , Dorota Pustelnik , Marek Szelągowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main objective of this article is to present a method for improving the business processes of a bank through an illustrative case study. The presented method enables financial institutions that operate in heavily regulated markets to combine a holistic view of business-process management (BPM) with a multi-faceted analysis of the effectiveness and risks of their implemented business processes as well as to implement selected improvements that are in accordance with the banks' project management standards. This method combines elements of BPM and project management, which allow for a continuous analysis of the implementations of changing financial regulatory requirements and emerging opportunities (including technological ones) while prioritizing any implemented changes considering the regulator's imposed obligations, risk mitigation, efficiency of changes, and employee development.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management; Banks; Business processes; Bank management; Effectiveness

PL

Zarządzanie; Banki; Procesy biznesowe; Zarządzanie bankiem; Efektywność

• Czasopismo: Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: spec. iss.
• Strony: 71--81

Twórcy

autor

Magdalena Toporowska

autor

Piotr Mańkowski

autor

Agnieszka Jadczyszyn

autor

Dorota Pustelnik

autor

Marek Szelągowski

• Polish Academy of Sciences

Bibliografia

• Aalst W., van der, Adriansyah A., Alves de Medeiros A.K. et al. (2023). Process MiningManifesto. IEEE Task Force on Process Mining. URL: https://www.tf-pm.org/resources/manifesto.
• APQC (n.d.). APQC Process Classification Framework. Houston, TX, USA: Ameri-can Productivity & Quality Center. URL: https://www.apqc.org/process-frame-works [12.06.2024].
• Auksztol J. & Chomuszko M. (2012). Model APQC - Uniwersalny Model Klasyfikacji Procesów. In: J. Auksztol & M. Chomuszko (red. nauk.), Modelowanie organizacji procesowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, pp. 73-90.
• Davey L. (1991). The Application of Case Study Evaluations. ERIC/TM Digest. Washington, DC, USA: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED). URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338706 [21.10.2024].
• Dumas M., La Rosa M., Mendling J. & Reijers H.A. (2018). Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Second Edition. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4.
• Hayes R., Kyer B. & Weber E. (2015). The Case Study Cookbook. Worcester, MA, USA: Polytechnic Institute.
• Helbin T. & Van Looy A. (2019) Business process ambidexterity and its impact on business-IT alignment. A systematic literature review. 13th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 29-31 May, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2019.8877073.
• Mahal A. (2010). How Work Gets Done: Business Process Management, Basics and Beyond. Technics Publications.
• Mertens D.M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Fourth Edition. New York: SAGE.
• Szelągowski M. (2019). Dynamic Business Process Management in the Knowledge Economy: Creating Value from Intellectual Capital. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 71, Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17141-4.
• Szelągowski M., Sliż P., Berniak-Woźny J., Potoczek N., Napieraj A., Podobińska-Staniec M. & Senkus P. (2024). Exploring the diversity of business process nature in organisations in Industry 4.0/5.0. Future Business Journal, 10, 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00395-5.
• Yin R.L. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fourth Edition. New York: SAGE.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/dmms.2024.si.6658