Reputational Risk Management

• Autorzy: Jan Krzysztof Solarz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. Reputational risk cross building competitive position or mark management. Shareholders of reputational risk management are more heterogenic. Therefore, it is not surprising that managing reputational risk has now become a major preoccupation for business in the private, public and not-for profits sectors.
Research aims. The reputational risk is placed at the top of the risk hierarchy as the risk of others risks. As such, it need in new cognitive framework. In this case we study how manage complexity item.
Methodology. Comparative analysis of models of reputation risk management devoted the cognitive framework located in time and institutional space.
Key findings. Reputational risk management is reduction of internal cost of particular activity, cover transactional cost of monitoring such type of risk and calculate external cost of reputation lost. One of this external cost is crush of reputation on public trust institutions. The current paper demonstrates and reviews different theoretical perspectives that conceptualize reputational risk management. The first part presents cognitive perspective on reputation. The second part covers behavioral approach to risk management. Finally, the paper provides practitioners with a systematic review of different approaches adopted to study reputational risk management. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Moral hazard; Risk management

PL

Pokusa nadużycia; Zarządzanie ryzykiem

• Czasopismo: International Journal of Contemporary Management
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 17
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 323--336

Twórcy

autor

Jan Krzysztof Solarz

• University of Social Science, Warszawa, Poland

Bibliografia

• Belenzon, S., Chatterji, A. & Daley, B. (2018). Choosing between Growth and Glory. Cambridge (Mass.): National Bureau of Economic Research 24901.
• Berent, T. (2013). Ogólna teoria dźwigni finansowej. Warszawa: SGH.
• Bieńkowska, J. & Sikorski, C. (2016). Ewolucja zarządzania. Dyktat struktury, strategii i kultury. Łódź: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Blakstad, S. & Allen, R. (2018). Fintech Revolution. Universal Inclusion in the New Financial Ecosystem. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Dąbrowski, T.J. (2016). Kształtowanie reputacji banku komercyjnego. Podejście symboliczne i substancjonalne. Warszawa: SGH.
• Dyląg, A. & Jedynak, P. (2016). Resources and reputation in the management of universities. Jagiellonian Journal of Management, 2(1), 35-44.
• EBC (2016). Decyzja EBC w sprawie oceny spełniania wymogów dotyczących kompetencji i reputacji, nr 42, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/celex_32017d004201-pl (aceesed: 2nd April 2018).
• Fukuyama, F. (1997). Zaufanie. Kapitał społeczny a droga do dobrobytu. Tłum. A. Śliwa, L. Śliwa. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Gospodarowicz, A. (red.) (2018). Bankowość elektroniczna. Istota i innowacje. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
• Heidinger, D. & Gatzert, N. (2018). Awareness, Determinants and Value of Reputational Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from the Banking and Insurance Industry. Erlangen-Nuernberg: Friedrich-Alexander University.
• Hwang, I.D. (2017). Which Type of Trust Matters? Interpersonala vs. Institutional vs. Political Trust [Bank of Korea, Working Paper No. 15].
• Jedynak, P. (2018). Znormalizowane systemy zarządzania a ryzyko działalności organizacji. Kraków: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Joesang, A., Ismail, R. & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation system for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618-644.
• Krzakiewicz, K. & Cyfert, S. (2015). Organizational reputational risk management as a component of dynamic capabilities management process. Management, 19(1), 6-18.
• Larkin, J. (2003). Strategic Reputation Risk Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Linciano, N. & Soccorso, P. (eds.) (2017). Challenges in Ensuring Financial Competencies (2017). CONSOB Working Paper No. 84.
• Liu, M., Brynjolfsson, E. & Dowlatabadi, J. (2018). Do Digital Platforms Reduce Moral Hazard? The Case of Uber and Yaxis [NBER, Working Paper No. 25015].
• Miklaszewska, E. (2018). Zmiany strategiczne na europejskim rynku bankowym w okresie pokryzysowym. Warszawa: Poltext.
• Paliszkiewicz, J. (2013). Zaufanie w zarządzaniu. Warszawa: WN PWN.
• Pawłowicz, L. (2018). Moral hazard w pośrednictwie finansowym. Warszawa: Wyd. Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• Seretny, M. (2018). Co dalej z odpowiedzialnym zarządzaniem? In: G. Gierszewska (red.). Co dalej z zarządzaniem? (pp. 171-194). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
• Shuttleworth, C.C. (2009). Towards a Financial Literacy Model as a Coordinanting Interface between Financial Information and Decision Makers. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
• Thakor, R.T. & Merton, R.C. (2018). Trust in Lending [National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 24778].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/24498939IJCM.18.049.10035