Contingent Valuation of The Wielkopolska National Park By Respondends of Differentiated Age and Education

• Autorzy: Adam Zydroń , Dariusz Kayzer , krzysztof Szoszkiewicz , Mateusz Iwiński
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to identify factors determining propensity to incur costs for the Wielkopolska National Park and to accept compensation for the prevention of access to the Park depending on the age and education of respondents. Source materials for the investigation of this problem were collected in the course of a survey in the form of standardised interviews, conducted in the years of 2012-2013 among residents of towns located within communes, in which the Park is situated. Analyses were conducted using contingency tables. Based on research results it was found that respondents assess the value of WNP differently depending on their age and education. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Natural environment; Valuation

PL

Środowisko przyrodnicze; Wycena

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 1 (60)
• Strony: 138--147

Twórcy

autor

Adam Zydroń

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

autor

Dariusz Kayzer

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

autor

krzysztof Szoszkiewicz

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

autor

Mateusz Iwiński

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

Bibliografia

• Bartczak A. (2015), The role of social and environmental attitudes in non market valuation. An application to the Białowieża Forest, "Forest Policy and Economics" No. 50, p. 357-365.
• Bateman I.J. (2000), Monetary valuation of environmental preferences extending the standard economic theory of values. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia and University College, London.
• Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Kerkvliet J., (1997), A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation, "American Journal of Agricultural Economics" No. 79, p. 252-26.
• Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L., Swait J., Williams M., Louviere J. (1996), A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation, "Ecological Economics" No. 18, p. 243-253.
• Cameron T.A., Englin J. (1997), Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods, "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management" No. 33, p. 296-313.
• Cyrul D. (ed.) (2000), Polska. Parki narodowe, Warszaw.
• Farreras V., Riera P., Mogas J. (2005), Does gender matter in valuation studies? Evidence from three forestry applications, "Forestry" No. 78(3), p. 239-248.
• Gołos P. (2001), Wycena wartości ekonomicznej rekreacyjnej funkcji lasu na przykładzie Leśnego Kompleksu Promocyjnego Gostynińsko-Włocławskiego, IBL, Warszawa, Rozprawa doktorska.
• Gołos P., Ukalska J. (2016), Hipotetyczna gotowość finansowania publicznych funkcji lasu i gospodarki leśnej, "Sylwan" No. 160 (7), p. 597-608.
• Georgiou S. (1996), Metoda wyceny warunkowej, in: Andresen G., Śleszyński J. (eds), Ekonomiczna wycena środowiska przyrodniczego, Białystok.
• Holmes, Kramer (2001), An independent sample test of yea-saying and starting point bias in dichotomous choice contingent valuation, "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management" No. 29(1), p. 121-132.
• Majumdar S., Deng J., Zhanga Y., Pierskalla Ch. (2011), Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia, "Urban Forestry &Urban Greening" No. 10, p. 275-280.
• Mitchell R.C, Carson R.T. (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
• Mizaras S., Kavaliauskas M., Cinga G., Mizaraite D., Belova O. (2015), Socio-economics Aspects of Recreational Use of Forests in Lithuania, "Baltic Forestry" No. 21(2), p. 308-314.
• Nielsen A.B., Olsen S.B., Lundhede T. (2007), An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature based forest management practices, "Landscape and Urban Planning" No. 80, p. 63-71.
• Nowacki M. (2009), Skłonność do zapłaty a cena wstępu do atrakcji turystycznej, ,,Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki'' No. 13, p. 101-104.
• Spash C.L. (2000), Ecosystems, Contingent Valuation and Ethics. The Case of Wetland ReCreation, ,,Ecological Economics'' No. 34(2), p. 195-215.
• Willis K.G. (1994), Paying for Heritage: What Price for Durham Cathedral? , "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management'' No. 37(3), p. 267-278.
• Wyczyńscy H.J. (2006), Wielkopolski Park Narodowy, Jeziory, p. 40-46.
• Zydroń A., Kayzer D. (2015), Podnoszenie świadomości społeczeństwa o nowych metodach wyceny wartości przyrody - Willingness to Pay oraz Willingness to Accept na przykładzie Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego, Poznań.