Prawo oskarżonego do wyłączenia indywidualnie wskazanych przysięgłych (challenge to the polls, in capita) w angielskim procesie karnym (od XIII do I poł. XVI w.)

• Autorzy: Paweł Złamańczuk

Warianty tytułu

The Right of the Defendant to Challenge Individual Jurors (Challenge to the Polls, in Capita) in the English Criminal Trial (from the 13th Until the First Half of the 16th Century)

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł poświęcono prawu oskarżonego do wyłączenia z postępowania sądowego wskazanych przysięgłych. Omówiono wyłączenie przysięgłych "per causam" oraz prawo bezwzględnego wyłączenia przysięgłych. Przedstawiono również instytucję wyłączenia przysięgłych jako taktykę stosowaną przez oskarżonych, konsekwencje nadużycia oraz trudności pojawiające się w praktycznym stosowaniu tego prawa oskarżonych.

EN

By the English common law, challenges were generally of two kinds: to the array, that is to the whole number of persons in the panel, and to the polls, that is to say to individual jurors. Defendant was allowed to challenge jurors, for cause or peremptorily before they were sworn in. He was permitted to exercise thirty-five peremptory challenges in favorem vitae. That number was reduced to twenty in 1530. The article discusses and analyzes the right of the accused person to challenge particular jurors. The paper covers the period of the 13th-16th centuries. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Prawo karne; Kodeks karny

EN

Criminal Law; Criminal Code

• Czasopismo: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 13
• Strony: 283--300

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Złamańczuk

• Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, doktorant

Bibliografia

• Baran K., Dawny angielski proces karny. (Do połowy XVII stulecia), "Krakowskie Studia Prawnicze" 1978, rok XI, s. 135.
• Baran K., Kilka uwag na temat dobrodziejstwa kleru w dawnej angielskiej procedurze karnej, [w:] Dziedzictwo prawne XX wieku, Kraków 2001, s. 107-112.
• Baran K., Strony procesowe przed angielskimi sądami karnymi doby Tudorów i wczesnych Stuartów (do roku 1640), Kraków 1994, s. 59.
• Baker J.H., An Introduction to English Legal History, London 1990, s. 78, 87.
• Baker J.H., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. VI, 1483-1558, Oxford 2003, s. 612.
• Baker J.H., Criminal courts and procedure at common law, 1550-1800, [w:] Crime in England 1500-1800, red. J. S. Cockburn, London 1977, s. 23.
• Baker J.H., John Bryt's Reports (1410-1411) and the Year Books of Henry IV, "Cambridge Law Journal" 1989, vol. 48, s. 106.
• Baker J.H. [red.], Selden Society, vol. 115, London 1999, s. 6.
• Beattie J.M., Crime and the Courts in England, 1660-1800, Oxford 1986, s. 340.
• Bellamy, Crime and Public Order in England in the Later Middle Ages, London 1973, s. 143. W 1249 r.
• Bellamy J., The Criminal Trial in Later Medieval England, Toronto 1998, s. 100.
• Bellamy J., The Law of Treason in England in the Later Middle Ages, Cambridge 1970, s. 166.
• Bellamy J.G., The Tudor Law of Treason. An Introduction, Toronto 1979, s. 167.
• Blackstone W., Commentaries on the Laws of England, red. T. A. Green, vol. IV, Chicago 1979, s. 346.
• Clanchy M.T., From Memory to Written Record: England 1066-1307, Oxford 1993, s. 275.
• Clayton D. J., The Administration of the County Palatine of Chester, 1442-1485, Chetham Society vol. XXXV, Third Series, Manchester 1990, s. 225-226.
• Cockburn J.S., A History of English Assizes 1558-1714, Cambridge 1972, s. 120.
• Cockburn J.S., Calendar of Assize Records: Home Circuit Indictments, Elizabeth I and James I: Introduction, London 1985, s. 57.
• Green T.A., The Jury and the English Law of Homicide, 1200-1600, "Michigan Law Review" 1976, vol. 74, s. 489.
• Groot R.T., Teaching Each Other: Judges, Clerks, Jurors and Malefactors Define the Guilt/Innocence Jury, [w:], Learning the Law, Teaching and the Transmission of Law in England, 1150-1900, red. J. A. Bush, A. Wijffels, London 1999, s. 28.
• Hale M., Historia Placitorum Coronae. The History of the Pleas of the Crown, Philadelphia 1847, vol. II, s. 267.
• Hamil F.C., The King's Approvers: A chapter in the history of English criminal law, Speculum 1936, vol. XI, s. 232-58.
• Hanawalt B.A., Crime and Conflict in English Communities 1300-1348, Cambridge 1979, s. 41.
• Hawkins W., A Treatise of the Pleas of the Crown, London 1824, vol. II, s. 458.
• Howell J.B., State Trials, vol. XXVI, London 1819, s. 1235-1236.
• King P.J.R., "Illiterate Plebeians, Easily Misled": Jury Composition, Experience, and Behaviour in Essex, 1735-1815, [w:] Twelve Good Men and True. The Criminal Trial Jury in England, 1200-1800, red. J. S. Cockburn, T. A. Green, New s. 227.
• Klerman D., Was the jury ever self informing, [w:] Judicial Tribunals in England and Europe, 1200-1700. The Trial in History, vol. I, red. M. Mulholland, B. Pullan, Manchester 2003, s. 58.
• Klementowski M.L., Angielskie tradycje ochrony wolności osobistej, [w:] Państwo - Prawo - Myśl prawnicza. Prace dedykowane Prof. G. L. Seidlerowi w dziewięćdziesiątą rocznicę urodzin, Lublin 2003, s. 108-110.
• Langbein J.H., Prosecuting Crime in The Renaissance: England, Germany, France, Cambridge 1974, s. 22-43, 118-121.
• Langbein J.H., The Criminal Trial Before the Lawyers, 45 University of Chicago Law Review (1978), vol. 45, s. 275-276.
• Langbein J.H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford 2003, s. 32.
• Macnair M., Vicinage and the Antecedents of the Jury, Law & History Review 1999, nr 17, http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/17.3/macnair.html (22. 08. 2008).
• Meekings C.A.F., Thomas Kerver's Case, 1444, "The English Historical Review" 1975, nr 355, s. 335.
• Milsom S.F.C., Historical Foundations of the Common Law, London 1969, s. 360.
• Musson A., Public Order and Law Enforcement: The Local Administration of Criminal Justice, 1294-1350, Woodbridge 1996, s. 192.
• Musson A., Turning King's Evidence: The Prosecution of Crime in Late Medieval England, "Oxford Journal of Legal Studies" 1999, vol. 19, s. 472-473.
• Plucknett T.F.T., A Concise History of the Common Law, London 1940, s. 263.
• Pollock F., Maitland F.W., The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, vol. II, Cambridge 1968, s. 621.
• Post J.B., The Admissibility of Defence Counsel in English Criminal Procedure, [w:] Custom, Courts, and Counsel. Selected Papers of the 6th British Legal History Conference Norwich 1983, red. A. Kiralfy, M. Slatter, R. Virgoe, London 1985, s. 23-32.
• Post J.B., Jury Lists and Juries in the Late Fourteenth Century, [w:] Twelve Good Men and True. The Criminal Trial Jury in England, 1200-1800, red. J. S. Cockburn, T. A. Green, New, s. 340.
• Powell E., Jury Trial at Gaol Delivery in the Late Middle Ages: the Midland Circuit, 1400-1429, [w:] Twelve Good Men and True. The Criminal Trial Jury in England, 1200-1800, red. J. S. Cockburn, T. A. Green, New, s. 111-116.
• Powell E., Kingship, Law and Society. Criminal Justice in the Reign of Henry V, Oxford 1989, s. 78, 186.
• Readings and Moots at the Inns of Court in the Fifteenth Century, vol. II, red. S. E. Thorne, J. H. Baker, Selden Society vol. 105, London 1990, s. 180, Harley Ms. 1691.
• Reeves' History of the English Law, from the Time of the Romans to the End of the Reign of Elizabeth, red. W.F. Finlason, Philadelphia 1880, vol. IV, s. 449, 451.
• Reports from the Lost Notebooks of Sir James Dyer, red. J. H. Baker, Selden Society vol. 110, London 1994, s. 243.
• Reports of Cases Taken and Collected by Sir James Dyer, Part II, London 1794, s. 152b.
• Reports of Cases by John Caryll, Part I, 1485-1499.
• Rörkasten J., Some Problems of the Evidence of Fourteenth-Century Approvers, [w:] Custom, Courts, and Counsel. Selected Papers of the 6th British Legal History Conference Norwich 1983, red. A. Kiralfy, M. Slatter, R. Virgoe, London 1985, s. 14-22.
• Seipp D., Crime in the Year Books, [w:] Law Reporting in Britain. Proceedings of The Eleventh British Legal History Conference, red. C. Stebbings, London 1995, s. 22-26.
• Selected historical essays of F.W. Maitland, red. H. M. Cam, Cambridge 1957, s. 65-66.
• Staunford W., Les Plees del Coron (1583), Lib. 3, Cap. 7, s. 157b.
• Stephen J.F., A History of The Criminal Law of England, London 1883, vol. I, s. 303.
• Summerson H.R.T., Suicide and the Fear of the Gallows, "The Journal of Legal History" 2000, vol. 21, s. 53.
• Summerson H.R.T., The Early Development of the Peine Forte et Dure, [w:] Law, Litigants and the Legal Profession, red. E. W. Ives, A. H. Manchester, London 1983, s. 124.
• Thayer J.B., A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, Boston 1898, s. 123-124.
• The Eyre of Northamptonshire, 3-4 Edward III (1329-1330), vol. I, red. D. W. Sutherland, Selden Society, vol. 97, London 1983, s. 179.
• The Journal of the British Archaeological Association 1850, vol. V, s. 189-191.
• The Mirror of Justices, red. W.J. Whittaker, W.F. Maitland, Selden Society, vol. VII, London 1895, Ch. XXXIV, s. 116-117.
• The Reports of Sir John Spelman, red. J. H. Baker, vol. II, Selden Society vol. 94, London 1977, s. 107.
• The Reports of William Dalison, 1552-1558, red. J. H. Baker, Selden Society, vol. 124, London 2007, s. 135-136.
• Year Books of the Reign of King Edward the First: Years XXX and XXXI, red. A. J. Horwood, London 1863, s. xliv-xlvii, 529-532.
• Year Books of the Reign of King Edward the Third: Years XIV and XV, red. L. O. Pike, London 1889, s. xxv-xxviii, 260-261.
• Year Books of the Reign of King Edward The Third, Year XVII, red. L. O. Pike, London 1901, s. 280-281, note 8.
• Year Books of the Reign of King Edward the Third: Years XII and XIII, red. L. O. Pike, London 1885, s. lxxiii, 18-19 note 13.
• Year Books of Edward II, vol. 5: The Eyre of Kent, 6 & 7 Edward II (1313-1314), vol. 1, red. W.C. Bolland, F. W. Maitland, Selden Society, vol. 24, London 1910, s. l-li.