Relationships with Stakeholders in International Research Projects in Poland

• Autorzy: Aleksandra Spik , Michał Mijal

Warianty tytułu

Relacje z interesariuszami w międzynarodowych projektach badawczych w Polsce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper investigates the main areas of friction between managers and stakeholders of scientific projects. Five areas are defined and examples of problems are given. Not unlike similar research in other countries, the main factors influencing the overall efficiency of the management process are: communication, lack of institutional support, attitudes towards the project, financing system and lack of industry interest. The findings and limitations are laid out and the ways of developing the research into other research projects are pointed out. (original abstract)

Artykuł opisuje główne obszary tarcia pomiędzy kierownikami projektów badawczych i interesariuszami tych projektów. Na podstawie analizy wyodrębniono pięć obszarów problemowych oraz zilustrowano przykładami. Podobnie jak w projektach badawczych w innych krajach, główne obszary wpływające na skuteczność i efektywność procesów zarządzania to: komunikacja, brak wsparcia instytucjonalnego, postawy wobec projektu, system finansowania oraz brak zainteresowania ze strony przemysłu. W podsumowaniu zaprezentowano ograniczenia wyciągniętych wniosków i wskazano możliwe kierunki prowadzenia dalszych badań z omawianego zakresu. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Stakeholders; Framework Programme; Scientific research

PL

Interesariusze; Program Ramowy; Badania naukowe

• Czasopismo: Problemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 16
• Numer: nr 4 (77) Contemporary Challenges to Academic Governance and University Cooperation with Stakeholders
• Strony: 63--84

Twórcy

autor

Aleksandra Spik

• University of Warsaw, Poland

autor

Michał Mijal

• University of Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Banks, M. & Vera, D. (2007). Towards a typology of stakeholder management strategies. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2007.26531873.
• 2. Brugha, B. & Varvasovszky, G. (2000a). Stakeholder analysis. A Review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/15.3.239.
• 3. Brugha, B. & Varvasovszky, G. (2000b). How to do (or not to do) ... A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-346.
• 4. Bryson, J.M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722.
• 5. Choi, J. & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.759.
• 6. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994.
• 7. Goh, C.H. & Hooper, V. (2009). Knowledge and information sharing in a closed information environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 21-34.
• 8. Mataković, H. & Novak, I. (2013). Croatia's participation in the Seventh Framework Programme: A moderate success? Business Systems Research Journal, 4(2), 126-143.
• 9. Maietta, O.W. (2015). Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341 - 1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006.
• 10. Ochieng, E.G. & Price, A.D. (2010). Managing cross-cultural communication in multicultural construction project teams: The case of Kenya and UK. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.001.
• 11. Pajunen, K.(2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1261-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00624.x.
• 12. Preston, L.E. & Sapienza, H.J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90023-Z.
• 13. Qureshi, S., Liu, M., & Vogel, D. (2006). The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-9006-6.
• 14. Ratcheva, V. (2009), Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes - The case of multidisciplinary project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 206-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.008.
• 15. Reed, A.H. & Knight, L.V. (2010). Effect of a virtual project team environment on communication-related project risk. International Journal of Project Management,28(5), 422-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.002.
• 16. Santos, V.R., Soares, A.L., & Carvalho, J.A. (2012). Knowledge sharing barriers in complex research and development projects: An exploratory study on the perceptions of project managers. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1379.
• 17. Stead, F. & Harington, A. (2000). A process perspective on international research project collaboration. Journal of Employment Counseling, 37, 88-97. https://doi.
• 18. org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2000.tb00826.x.
• 19. Stoddart, L. (2001) Managing intranets to encourage knowledge sharing: Opportunities and constraints. Online Information Review, 1, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520110366661.Švarc, J., Perkovic, J., & Lažnjak, A. (2011). Unintended consequences of innovation policy programmes: Social evaluation of technological projects programme in Croatia. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 13, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.1.77.
• 20. Szucs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47, 1256-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016j.respol.2018.04.009.
• 21. Szymaniec-Mlicka, K. (2016) Zarządzanie relacjami z interesariuszami publicznych podmiotów leczniczych. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej: Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 97, 309-320.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.77.4