PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 18 | nr 4 | 7--31
Tytuł artykułu

Human Resources Management Effectiveness from a Multilevel Perspective

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Efektywność zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi z perspektywy wielopoziomowej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background. Although it was proved that there is a positive relationship between effectiveness of HRM and performance of the organization, little is known why this relationship exists. It is due to the focus on the organizational level, instead of examining behavioral aspects of individuals in the organizations.
Research aims. The aim of presented article is to fill the gap in HRM effectiveness research by applying multilevel approach. A literature review was conducted to examine how HRM effectiveness was linked to other variables in previous research according to the multilevel logic.
Methodology. The article uses systematic literature review of the empirical research on HRM effectiveness focusing on its antecedents and outcomes.
Key findings. The review revealed scarcity of multilevel approach towards HRM effectiveness yet suggests there is a gap in examining antecedents and outcomes on individual or unit/ group level of analysis. (original abstract)
Chociaż udowodniono, że istnieje pozytywny związek między efektywnością zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi a wynikami organizacji, niewiele wiadomo, dlaczego ta relacja istnieje. Wynika to z koncentracji na poziomie organizacyjnym, zamiast badania behawioralnych aspektów poszczególnych osób w organizacji. Celem prezentowanego artykułu jest wypełnienie luki w badaniach efektywności zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi poprzez zastosowanie podejścia wielopoziomowego. Dokonano przeglądu literatury, aby sprawdzić, w jaki sposób efektywność ZZL powiązano z innymi zmiennymi w poprzednich badaniach zgodnie z logiką wielopoziomową. Systematyczny przegląd literatury dotyczył badań empirycznych nad efektywnością zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi, koncentrując się na jej antecedencjach i rezultatach. Wyniki przeglądu literatury wykazały niski poziom wykorzystania wielopoziomowego podejścia do rozważań nad efektywnością zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi, jednocześnie wskazując na istnienie istnieje luki w badaniu antecedenzji i rezultatów na poziomie indywidualnym oraz jednostki organizacyjnej i grupy. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Tom
18
Numer
Strony
7--31
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
autor
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Aguinis, H., Boyd, B., Pierce, C. & Short, J. (2011). Walking New Avenues in Management Research Methods and Theories: Bridging Micro and Macro Domains. Journal of Management, 37, 395-403.
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Troth, A. C., Lawrence, S. A. & Jordan, P. J. (2017). Emotions and emotional regulation in HRM: A multi-level perspective. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing, 1-52.
  • Azmi, F. T. (2011). Strategic Human Resource Management and its Linkage with HRM Effectiveness and Organizational Performance: Evidence from India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3888-3912.
  • Bennett, N., Ketchen, D. J. & Schultz, E. B. (1998). An examination of factors associated with the integration of human resource management and strategic decision making. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 3-16.
  • Bos-Nehles, A., Van Riemsdijk, M. J. & Looise, J. K. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers' HRM implementation. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861-877.
  • Bowen, D. E. & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the "strength" of the HRM system. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221.
  • Chang, E. (2005). Employees' Overall Perception of HRM Effectiveness. Human Relations, 58(4), 523-544.
  • Chew, I. K. H. & Sharma, B. (2005). The effects of culture and HRM practices on firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 26(6), 560-581.
  • Choi, J. H. (2014). Who should be the respondent? Comparing predictive powers between managers' and employees' responses in measuring high-performance work systems practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2667-2680.
  • De Winne, S., Delmotte, J., Gilbert, C. & Sels L. (2013). Comparing and explaining HR department effectiveness assessments: evidence from line managers and trade union representatives. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(8): 1708-1735.
  • Foss, N. J., Pedersen, T., Reinholt Fosgaard, M. & Stea, D. (2014). Why Complementary HRM Practices Impact Performance: The Case of Rewards, Job Design, and Work Climate in a Knowledge-Sharing Context. Human Resource Management, 54(6), 955-976.
  • Gao, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Ch., Li, Ch. & Wu, Ch. (2016). Expectations, effectiveness and discrepancies: exploring multiple HR roles in the Chinese business context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(10), 1101-1133.
  • Guenole, N. (2016). The importance of isomorphism for conclusions about homology: A Bayesian multi-level structural equation modeling approach with ordinal indicators. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 289.
  • Guest, D. & Conway, N. (2011). The impact of HR practices, HR effectiveness and a 'strong HR system' on organizational outcomes: a stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(8), 1686-1702.
  • Guest, D. E. & Peccei, R. (1994). The nature and causes of effective human resource management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2), 219-242.
  • Han, J., Chou, P., Chao, M. & Wright, P. (2006). The HR competencies-HR effectiveness link: a study in Taiwanese high-tech companies. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 391-406.
  • Harris, K. J., Lambert, A. & Harris, R. B. (2013). HRM effectiveness as a mediator of the relationships between abusive supervision and technology work overload and job outcomes for technology end users. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1686-1695.
  • Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E. & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385-1399.
  • House, R., Rousseau, D. & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 17(1), 71-114.
  • Huff, J. & Schüssler, M. (2016). HRM and the role of internal fit - A systems-behavioral model of HRM effectiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 2016, Anaheim, CA, USA.
  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
  • Huselid, M. A. & Becker B. E. (1997). The impact of high performance work systems implementation effectiveness, and alignment with strategy on shareholder wealth. Academy of Management Proceedings, 97, 144-148.
  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171-188.
  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D., Hu, J. & Baer, J. (2012). How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(60), 1264-1294.
  • Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R. & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Where do we go from here? New perspectives on the black box in strategic human resource management research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1448-1480.
  • Kane, B., Crawford, J. & Grant, D. (1999). Barriers to effective HRM. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 494-515.
  • Kim, S. & Ryu, S. (2011). Social capital of the HR department, HR's change agent role, and HR effectiveness: evidence from South Korean firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(8), 1638-1653.
  • Klaas, B. S., Semadeni, M., Klimchak, M. & Ward, A. K. (2012). High-performance work system implementation in small and medium enterprises: A knowledge-creation perspective. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 487-510.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31-48.
  • Mitsuhashi, H., Park, H. J., Wright, P. M. & Chua, R. S. (2000). Line and HR executives' perceptions of HR effectiveness in firms in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 197-216.
  • Molina-Azorín, J. F., Pereira-Moliner, J., López-Gamero, M. D., Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. & Tarí, J. J. (2019). Multilevel research: Foundations and opportunities in management. Business Research Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.03.004
  • Obeidat, S. M. (2016). The link between e-HRM use and HRM effectiveness: an empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(6), 1281-1301.
  • Perry, E. L. & Kulik, C. T. (2008). The devolution of HR to the line: Implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(2), 262-273.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
  • Renkema, M., Meijerink, J. & Bondarouk, T. (2017). Advancing multilevel thinking in human resource management research: Applications and guidelines. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 397-415.
  • Richard, O. C. & Johnson, N. B. (2001). Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness and Firm Performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2), 299-310.
  • Richard, O. C. & Johnson, N. B. (2004). High performance work practices and human resource management effectiveness: substitutes or complements? Journal of Business Strategies, 21(2), 133-148.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-37.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Multilevel competencies and missing linkages. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 572-582). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ruël, H., Bondarouk, T., & Van der Velde, M. (2007). The Contribution of E-HRM to HRM effectiveness. Results from a Quantitative Study in a Dutch Ministry. Employee Relations, 29, 280-291.
  • Ryu, S. & Kim, S. (2013). First-line Managers' HR Involvement and HR Effectiveness: The Case of South Korea. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 947-966.
  • Shen J., Messersmith, J. G. & Jiang, K. (2018). Advancing human resource management scholarship through multilevel modeling. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 227-238.
  • Teo, S. T. T. (2000). Evidence of strategic HRM linkages in eleven Australian corporatized public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 29(4), 557-574.
  • Teo, S. T. T. (2002). Effectiveness of a corporate HR department in an Australian public sector entity during commercialization and corporatization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 89-105.
  • Teo, S. T. T., Ahmad, T. & Rodwell J. J. (2003). HR role effectiveness and organizational culture in Australian local government. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41(3), 298-315.
  • Teo, S. T. T. & Crawford, J. (2005). Indicators of Strategic HRM Effectiveness: A Case Study of an Australian Public Sector Agency During Commercialization. Public Personnel Management, 34(1), 1-16.
  • Tsui, A. S. (1990). A multiple-constituency model of effectiveness: An empirical examination at the human resource subunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 458-483.
  • Wang, D. S. & Shyu, C. L. (2008). Will the Strategic Fir Between Business and HRM Strategy Influence HRM Effectiveness and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Manpower, 29(2), 92-110.
  • Wang, D. S. & Shyu, C. L. (2009). The Longitudinal Effect of HRM Effectiveness and Dynamic Innovation Performance on Organizational Performance in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(8), 1790-1809.
  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J. & Harvey, P. (2010). Moderating and Mediating the HRM Effectiveness - Intent to Turnover Relationship: The Roles of Supervisors and Job Embeddedness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(2), 182-196.
  • Wheeler, A. R., Halbesleben, J. R. B. & Harris, K. J. (2012). How job-level HRM effectiveness influences employee intent to turnover and workarounds in hospitals. Journal of Business Research, 65(4), 547-554.
  • Wright, P. & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research. Journal of Management, 28(3): 247-276.
  • Wright, P. & Haggerty, J. (2005). Missing Variables in Theories of Strategic Human Resource Management: Time, Cause, and Individuals. Management revue. The International Review of Management Studies, 16, 164-173.
  • Wright, P. & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: integrating multiple levels of analysis. In: J. Paauwe, D. Guest & P. Wright, HRM and Performance: Achievements and Challenges (pp. 97-110). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Wright, P. M., Nyberg, A. J. & Ployhart, R. E. (2018). A Research Revolution in SHRM: New Challenges and New Research Directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 36, 141-161.
  • Wright, P. & Ulrich, M. (2017). A Road Well Traveled: The Past, Present, and Future Journey of Strategic Human Resource Management. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 45-65.
  • Wright, P. M., McMahan, G., Snell, S. & Gerhart, B. (2001). Comparing line and HR executives' perceptions of HR effectiveness: services, roles, and contributions. Human Resource Management, 40, 111-123.
  • Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., McCormick, B. & Sherman, W. S. (1998). Strategy, Core Competence, and HR Involvement as Determinants of HR Effectiveness and Refinery Performance. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 17-29.
  • Yang, Ch. & Lin, C. (2014). Does Technical or Strategic HRM Provide a Better Explanation of Organization Performance? iBusiness, 6, 52-62.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171592443

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.