Teorie integracji a grupy nacisku na poziomie Unii Europejskiej

• Autorzy: Katarzyna Tarnawska

Warianty tytułu

Theories of Integration and Pressure Groups in the European Union

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W opracowaniu omówiono wpływ grup nacisku na procesy integracyjne zachodzące w Unii Europejskiej. Zaprezentowano teorie, kładące główny nacisk na udział tych grup w integracji europejskiej.

EN

This article, in discussing the theory of integration, demonstrates the impact of pressure groups n the integration process in the European Union. Among European integration theories, the lost distinguishable are those that focus on the engagement of nation-states in the integration processes as well as those that emphasise the importance of extra-national institutions in such processes. The latter theories recognise the contribution of pressure groups in deepening integration. According to historical chronology, these include: federalism, functionalism and neo-functionalism, multi-level governance and the concept of "extra-nationality". Theoretical work of late focuses increasing attention on the problem of democracy deficit in the European Union. Resolution of this problem is a pre-condition for continued progress in the integration of EU countries.The theoretical concepts presented in this work demonstrate that many actors take part in European Union integration processes and that extra-national pressure groups play an increasingly significant role. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Teoria ekonomii; Grupa interesu

EN

Economic theory; Interest group

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2003
• Numer: nr 635
• Strony: 43--56

Twórcy

autor

Katarzyna Tarnawska

Bibliografia

• Benz A., Restoring Accountability in Multilevel Governance. Niepublikowany referat, przygotowany na ECPR Joint Session Workshop, Workshop 5: Governance and Democratic Legitimacy, Grenoble, Kwiecień 2001, http://essex.ac.uk/ecpr/jointsessions/grenoble/papersAvs5/benz.pdf.
• Borzel T.A., Risse T., Who is Afraid of a European Federation? How to Constitutional^ a Multi-Level Governance System, Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers 2000, http://law.harvard.edu/programs/ JeanMonnet/papers/00/OOOf 101 .html
• Cram L., Policy-making in the European Union. Conceptual lenses and the integration process, Routled-ge, London-New York 1997.
• Eriksen E.O.,. Possum I.E., The European Union and Post-national Integration, ARENA Working Papers WP 99/9, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_9.htm.
• European Governance. A White Paper, European Commission, 2001.
• European Union. Power and Policy-making, ed. J. Richardson, Routledge: London, New York 1996.
• Galloway D., The Treaty of Nice and Beyond. Realities and Illusions of Power in the EU, Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield 2001.
• Jachtenfuchs M., The Governance Approach to European Integration, "Journal of Common Market Studies", June 2001, Vol. 39, No 2.
• Jachtenfuchs M., Kohler-Koch B., The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, praca niepublikowana.
• Jensen C.S., Neofunctionalist Theories and the Development of European Social and Labour Market Policy, "Journal of Common Market Studies", Vol. 38, No 1, March 2000.
• Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union. Annexes to the Presidency conclusions-Laeken, 14 and 15 December 2001.
• Lobbying in the European Community, S. Mazey, J. Richardson ed., Oxford University Press, New York 1993.
• The European Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, B.F. Nelsen, A. C-G. Stubb ed., MacMillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London 1998.
• Majone G., Europe's "Democratic Deficit": The Question of Standards, "European Law Journal", Vol. 4, No 1,1 March 1998.
• Marks G., Hooghe L., Blank K., European Integration from the 1980s: State Centric v. Multi-level Governance, "Journal of Common Market Studies", Vol. 34, No 3, September 1996.
• Mazey S., Richardson J., Interest Groups and EU Policy Making: Organizational Logic and Venue Shopping, http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/Politics/Jeremy4.html. National Public and Private EC Lobbying, M.P.C.M. Van Schendelen ed., Dartmouth 1993.
• Risse-Kappen T, Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union, "Journal of Common Market Studies", Vol. 34, No 1, March 1996.
• Pollack M.A., Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community, International Organization 51,1, Winter 1997.
• Rosamond W.B., Theories of European Integration, Palgrave: Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York 2000.
• Sandholtz W, Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions, "Journal of Common Market Studies", Vol. 34, No 3, September 1996.
• Schmitter Ph.C., What Is There to Legitimize in the European Union... and How Might This Be Accomplished1}, niepublikowany referat, przygotowany na ECPR Joint Session Workshop, Workshop 5: Governance and Democratic Legitimacy, Grenoble. Kwiecień 2001, http://essex.ac.uk/ecpr/joint-sessions/grenoble/papers/ws5/schmitter.pdf.
• Somek A., On Supranationality, "European Integration online Papers", Vol. 5 (2001), No 3,19.04.2001, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-003a.htm
• Tsebeslis G., Kreppel A., The History of Conditional Agenda-Setting in European Institutions, http:// hypatia.ss.uci.edu/democ/papers/george.htm.