PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2005 | 11 | nr 1077 | 9--20
Tytuł artykułu

Różnica między ryzykiem a niepewnością i ich wpływ na sytuację decyzyjna podmiotu

Warianty tytułu
The Difference between Risk and Uncertainty and their Impact on the Agent's Decision Situation
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Celem artykułu jest opisanie różnic w sytuacji decyzyjnej podmiotów działających w warunkach ryzyka i niepewności oraz zanalizowanie wynikających stąd różnic w sposobie modelowania tych decyzji, a także zastanowienie, czy stosowane rozróżnienie sytuacji informacyjnej podmiotów ma jakiekolwiek znaczenie praktyczne.
EN
The decisions made by economic agents under the conditions of incomplete Information are most often divided into decisions made under risk and under uncertainty. Risk is to be understood as a situation when the objective probabilities of future events are being given, opposed to the uncertainty when such Information is not known. This classification proposed by Knight in 1921 practically lost its significance when Savage suggested that under conditions of uncertainty agents behave as if they based their decisions on the complete system of subjective probabilities. However, later findings, started with the experiments described by Ellsberg, proved that behaviour under uncertainty differs clearly from the predictions of expected utility model. It turned out that under uncertainty subjective probabilities system that agents use is incomplete and indistinct which has significant influence on agents' decisions. Moreover, as practically no economic decisions are being made under risk and almost all are being made under uncertainty these results imply that expected utility model has to be deeply modified in order to describe more accurately and predict more successfully decisions made under the conditions of incomplete information. (original abstract)
Twórcy
Bibliografia
  • Becker S.W., Brownson F.O., What Price Ambiguity? On the Role of Ambiguity in Decisionmaking, "Journal of Political Economy" vol. 72, 1964.
  • Brewer K.R.W., Fellner W., The Slanting of Subjective Probabilities - Agreement on Some Essentials, "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" vol. 79, 1965.
  • Camerer C.F., Do Biases in Probability Judgements Matter in Markets? Experimental Evidence, "The American Economic Review" vol. 77 (4), 1987.
  • Chu Y.-P., Chu R.-L., The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings: A Notę, "The American Economic Review" vol. 80, 1990.
  • Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M., Decision Making under Ambiguity, [w:] R.M. Hogarth, M.W. Reder (red.), Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1987.
  • Ellsberg D., Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms, "Quarterly Journal of Economics" vol. 75, 1961.
  • Fellner W., Distortion of Subjective Probabilities as a Reaction to Uncertainty, "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" vol. 75, 1961.
  • Fellner W., Slanted Subjective Probabilities and Randomization: Reply to Howard Raiffa and K.R.W. Brewer, "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" vol. 77, 1963.
  • Forlicz S., Niedoskonała wiedza podmiotów rynkowych, PWN, Warszawa 2001.
  • Gigerenzer G., Hell W., Blank H., Presentation and Content: The Use of Base Rates as a Continuous Variable, "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance" vol. 14, 1988.
  • Heilpern S., Podejmowanie decyzji w warunkach niepewności, AE, Wrocław 1992.
  • Heilpern S., Podejmowanie decyzji w warunkach ryzyka i niepewności, AE, Wrocław 2001.
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A., Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions, [w:] R.M. Hogarth, M.W. Reder (red.), Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1987.
  • Knight F.H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Hart Schaffner and Mara, New York 1921.
  • Kozielecki J., Psychologiczna teoria decyzji, PWN, Warszawa 1977.
  • Luce R.D., Raiffa H., Games and Decisions, Dover Publications 1989 (wydanie polskie: Gry i decyzje, PWN, Warszawa 1964).
  • Machina M.J., Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved, "Journal of Economic Perspectives" vol. l (1), 1987.
  • Marschak J. et al., Personal Probabilities of Probabilities, "Theory and Decision" 6, 1975.
  • McFadden D., Rationality for Economists?, "Journal of Risk and Uncertainty" vol. 19, 1999.
  • Miller D.W., Starr M.K., Praktyka i teoria decyzji, PWN, Warszawa 1971.
  • Preston M.G., Baratta P., An Experimental Study of the Auction-Value of an Uncertain Outcome, "American Journal of Psychology" vol. 51, 1948.
  • Rabin M., Psychology and Economics, "Journal of Economic Literature" vol. 36, 1998
  • Samuelson W.F., Marks S.G., Ekonomia menedżerska, PWE, Warszawa 1998.
  • Sarin R.K., Weber M., Effects of Ambiguity in Market Experiments, "Management Science" vol. 39 (5), 1993.
  • Savage L., The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1954.
  • Schmeidler D., Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity, "Econometrica" vol. 57, 1989.
  • Sherman R., The Psychological Difference between Ambiguity and Risk, "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" vol. 88, 1974.
  • Varian H.R., Mikroekonomia, PWN, Warszawa 1999.
  • Viscusi K. W., Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes, "Journal of Risk and Uncertainty" 2, 1989.
  • Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1944.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000123746506

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.