PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2007 | nr 3 | 11--27
Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ konkurencji oraz cyklu koniunkturalnego na zachowanie się marż monopolistycznych w gospodarce polskiej

Warianty tytułu
Impact of Competition and Business Cycles on the Behaviour of Monopolistic Markups in the Polish Economy
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie analizy wpływu stopnia konkurencji, zarówno wewnętrznej, jak i zewnętrznej oraz cyklu koniunkturalnego na kształtowanie się marż monopolistycznych w polskiej gospodarce. Otrzymane wyniki wskazują na występowanie znacznych marż w wielu sektorach gospodarki polskiej. Zgodnie z przeprowadzonymi estymacjami poziom koncentracji rynków ma istotnie ujemny, a poziom penetracji importowej dodatni wpływ na poziom marż. W badanej próbie występuje ujemna zależność między marżami a cyklem makroekonomicznym, co wydaje się potwierdzać wnioski z wielu modeli teoretycznych. Wyniki wskazują również na istnienie dodatniej, ale mniej wyraźnej zależności między cyklem mierzonym na poziomie sektora a wysokością marż. (abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of competition, both internal and external, and of the business cycle on monopolistic markups in the Polish economy. The results show that there are significant markups in several sectors of the economy which complies with earlier estimations by the authors. According to the estimations carried out, competition has a significant impact on the level of markups. This result applies both to internal competition, measured by market concentration, and foreign competition, measured by import penetration ratios. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between markups and the macroeconomic cycle which seems to confirm the conclusions from numerous theoretical macro and microeconomic models. The results also point to a positive but less clear correlation between the sectoral cycle and the level of markups. A different reaction of markups to the sectoral and macroeconomic cycles may result from a different nature of adjustments of businesses in reaction to exogenous shocks affecting either the sectoral or the macroeconomic environment of the enterprises. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
11--27
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
Bibliografia
  • Abraham E, Konïngs J., Vanormelingen S. (2006), Price and wage setting in an integrating Europe: Firm level evidence, "Working Paper", No. 93, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels.
  • Athey S., Bagwell K., Sanchirico C. (2004), Collusion and Price Higidity, "Review of Economic Studies", Vol. 71, No. 2, s. 317-349.
  • Atkinson F., Ehrman M., Smets E (2006), Inflation persistence and price setting behaviour in the Euro area. A summary of the IPN evidence, "Occasional Papers", No. 46, ECB, Frankfurt.
  • Bus M. (1989), Pricing in a Customer Market, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", Vol. 104, No. 4, s. 699-718.
  • Boulhol H. (2004), Has increased competition really pushed down manufacturing markups?, "Working Paper", CDC IXIS i TEAM (University Paris I Pantheon-Sorbonne and CNRS), http://team.univ-parisl.fr/seminaire/2004_boulhol.pdf
  • Christiano L. J., Eichenbaum M., Evans Ch. L. (2005), Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 113, No. 1, s. 1-46.
  • Comin D., Gertler M. (2006), Medium Term Business Cycles, 'American Economic Review", Vol. 96, No. 3, s. 523-551.
  • Gali J., Zilibotti F. (1995), Endogenous Growth and Poverty Traps in a Cournotian Model, 'Annales d'économie et de statistique", No. 37-38, s. 197-214.
  • Görg H., Warzynski F. (2003). Price Cost Margins and Exporting Behaviour: Evidence from Firm Level Data, "Discussion Paper", No. 365, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin.
  • Gradzewicz M., Hagemejer J. (2007), Marże monopolistyczne i przychody skali w gospodarce polskiej - Analiza mikroekonometryczna, "Ekonomista", w druku.
  • Green E.J., Porter, R.H. (1984), Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information, "Econometrica", Vol. 52, No. 1, s. 87-100.
  • Hall R. E. (1988), The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 96, No. 5, s. 921-947.
  • Hall R. L., Hitch C. J. (1939), Price Theory and Business Behaviour, "Oxford Economic Papers", No. 2., s. 12-45.
  • Hyde C. E., Perloff J. M. (1995J, Can market power be estimated?, "Review of Industrial Organization", No. 10, No. 4, s. 465-485.
  • Jorgenson D. W, Griliches Z. (1967), The explanation of productivity change, "Review of Economic Studies", Vol. 34, No. 4, s. 249-83.
  • Klette T . J. (1999), Market Power, Scale Economics and Productivity: Estimates from a Panel of Establishments Data, "Journal of Industrial Economics", Vol. 47, No. 4, s. 451-476.
  • Konings J., Van Cayselle P., Warzynski F. (2003), The Effects of Privatization and International Competitive Pressure on Firms' Price-Cost Margins: Micro Evidence from Emerging Economies, "Working Paper", No. 603, William Davidson Institute, http://wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp603.pdf
  • Konings J., Vandenbussche H., (2005), Antidumping protection and markups of domestic firms, "Journal of International Economics", Vol. 65, No. 1, s. 151-165.
  • Kreps D.M., Scheinkman J.A. (1983), Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes, "The Bell Journal of Economics", Vol. 14, No. 2, s. 326-337.
  • Lundin N.N. (2004), Has Import Disciplined Swedish Manufacturing Firms in the 1990s?, "Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade", Vol. 4, No. 2, s. 109-133.
  • Marchetti D. J. (2002), Markups and the Business Cycle: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Branches, "Open Economies Review", Vol. 13, No. 3, s. 87-103.
  • Martins J. O., Scarpetta, S. (1999), The Levels and Cyclical Behaviour of Mark-ups Across Countries and Market Structures, "Working Paper", No. 213, OECD Economic Department, Paris.
  • Melitz M. J. (2003), The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, Vol. 71, No. 6, s. 1965-1725.
  • Oulton N., Srinivasan S. (2003), Capital stocks, capital services and depreciation: an integrated framework, "Working Paper", No. 192, Bank of England, London.
  • Roeger W. (1995), Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual ProductivityMeasures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 103, No. 2, s. 316-330.
  • Rotemberg J. J., Saloner G. (1986), A Super-game Theoretic Model of Business Cycles and Price Wars During Booms, "American Economic Review", Vol. 76, No. 3, s. 390-407.
  • Rotemberg J. J, Woodford M. (1999), The Cyclical Behavior of Prices and Costs, w: J. Taylor, M Woodford (red.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1B, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Small I. (1997), The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups and Profit Margins: Some Evidence for Manufacturing and Services, "Working Paper", No. 72, Bank of England, London.
  • Solow R. M. (1957), Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function, "The Review of Economics and Statistics" Vol. 39, No. 3, s. 312-320.
  • Sweezy P. M. (1939), Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly, "The journal of Political Economy", Vol. 47, No. 4, s. 568-573.
  • Weitzman V. (1982), Increasing Returns and the Foundations of Unemployment Theory, "Economic Journal", Vol. 92, No. 368, s. 787-804.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000129915592

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.