Wycena systemów oprogramowania realizowanych na potrzeby administracji publicznej

• Autorzy: Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot

Warianty tytułu

Pricing of the software systems executed for the needs of public administration

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Systemy oprogramowania wspomagające zadania realizowane w obszarze administracji publicznej mają często charakter dedykowanych, nietypowych, unikatowych produktów, które powstają od podstaw na indywidualne zamówienie pojedynczego zleceniodawcy. Wynika to z faktu, iż w tym obszarze mamy zwykle do czynienia z oryginalnymi, niespotykanymi w sferze działalności gospodarczej zadaniami, często realizowanymi przez pojedyncze instytucje, zadaniami, dla których nie zostały wypracowane komercyjne rozwiązania lub są one trudne bądź niemożliwe do przeniesienia z innych obszarów czy krajów. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Software systems executed for the needs of public administration often hold a character of dedicated, individual solutions that entail particular problems with regard to their pricing. Thus for many years now objective and reliable approaches to the ex ante assessment of the costs of such systems have been sought out so that they could provide the possibility to make rational investment decisions concerning those systems. The purpose of this paper is to introduce approach to the pricing of dedicated software systems that in the area of public administration has been recently growing in global popularity and to introduce author's own practically verified model of pricing based on that approach. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Administracja publiczna; Efektywność ekonomiczna; Oprogramowanie

EN

Public administration; Economic efficiency; Software

• Czasopismo: Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych / Szkoła Główna Handlowa
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 24
• Strony: 43--61

Twórcy

autor

Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot

• Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

Bibliografia

• Czarnacka-Chrobot B., Analysis of the Functional Size Measurement Methods Usage by Polish Business Software Systems Providers, "Lecture Notes in Computer Science" 2009, vol. 5891, Software Process and Product Measurement, red. A. Abran, R. Braungarten, R. Dumke, J. Cuadrado-Gallego, J. Brunekreef, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, s. 17-34.
• Czarnacka-Chrobot B., Evaluation of Business Software Systems Development and Enhancement Projects Effectiveness and Economic Efficiency on the basis of Functional Size Measurement, roceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'11), The 2011 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering & Applied Computing (WORLDCOMP'11), vol. 2, red. H.R. Arabnia, H. Reza, L. Deligiannidis, CSREA Press, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, July 2011, s. 401-407.
• Czarnacka-Chrobot B., Rational Pricing of Business Software Systems on the basis of Functional ize Measurement: a Case Study from Poland, Proceedings of the 7th Software Measurement European Forum (SMEF 2010), red. T. Dekkers, Libreria Clup, Rome, Italy, June 2010, s. 43-58.
• Czarnacka-Chrobot B., The Economic Importance of Business Software Systems Size Measurement, Proceedings of the 5th International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI 2010), 20-25 September 2010, Valencia, Spain, red. Miguel Garcia, Jean-Denis Mathias, IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos, California-Washington-Tokyo 2010, s. 293-299.
• Czarnacka-Chrobot B., Wiarygodność metod szacowania pracochłonności przedsięwzięć rozwoju systemów oprogramowania wspomagających zarządzanie, "Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu" 2010, nr 88, Informatyka Ekonomiczna. Informatyka w zarządzaniu, red. J. Sobieska-Karpińska, s. 163-176.
• Finnish Software Metrics Association, nothernSCOPE - customer-driven scope control for ICT projects, FiSMA, 2007.
• Hill P.R., Some practical uses of the ISBSG history data to improve Project Management, ISBSG, Hawthorn, VIC 2007.
• International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, Data demographics - release 11, ISBSG, Hawthorn, Australia, June 2009.
• International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, The ISBSG Report: Software Project Estimates - How accurate are they?, ISBSG, Hawthorn, VIC, January 2005.
• International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, The ISBSG Special Analysis Report: Planning Projects - Project Phase Ratios, ISBSG, Hawthorn, VIC, March 2007.
• ISO/IEC 14143 Information Technology - Software measurement - Functional size measurement - Parts 1-6, ISO, Geneva 2011.
• ISO/IEC 19761 Software engineering - COSMIC: a functional size measurement method, edition 2, ISO, Geneva 2011.
• ISO/IEC 20926 Software and systems engineering - Software measurement - IFPUG functional size measurement method 2009, ISO, Geneva 2009.
• ISO/IEC 20968 Software engineering - Mk II Function Point Analysis - Counting practices manual, ISO, Geneva 2002.
• ISO/IEC 24570 Software engineering - NESMA functional size measurement method version 2.1 - Definitions and counting guidelines for the application of Function Point Analysis, ISO, Geneva 2005.
• ISO/IEC 29881 Information Technology - Software and systems engineering - FiSMA 1.1 functional size measurement method, ISO, Geneva 2010.
• Jones T.C., Software Estimating Rules of Thumb, Version 3, Software Productivity Research, 2007.
• Jones T.C., Software Project Management in the Twenty-first Century, Software Productivity Research, Burlington 1999.
• Rule G., The most common Functional Size Measurement (FSM) methods compared, Software Measurement Services, St. Clare's, Mill Hill, Edenbrige, Kent, UK 2010.
• Sage Technology, Report on the SCUD Methodology Review, June 2000.
• Standish Group, The CHAOS Manifesto, West Yarmouth, Massachusetts 2009.
• Standish Group, CHAOS Summary 2009, West Yarmouth, Massachusetts 2009.
• State Government of Victoria, southernSCOPE, Reference Manual, Version 1, Government of Victoria, Melbourne, September 2000.