On the Choice of Method in Multi-criteria Decision Aiding Process Concerning European Projects

• Autorzy: Dorota Górecka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper the problem of selecting the most appropriate multi-criteria decision aiding method for a particular application is considered. It is illustrated by a real-life example concerning applications for project co-financing by the European Union. Making a proper decision on which method to choose is difficult because of the great diversity of MCDA techniques proposed so far within the literature. Thus, the systematic analysis of their assumptions and properties is required. The paper presents the main strengths and weaknesses of particular decision aiding tools applicable to the problem of ordering European projects as well as chosen procedures aiming at facilitating the process of selecting an appropriate one. Moreover, an extension of EXPROM II by stochastic dominance rules is proposed.. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Multicriteria analysis; Decision Support Systems (DSS)

PL

Analiza wielokryterialna; Systemy wspomagania decyzji

• Czasopismo: Multiple Criteria Decision Making / University of Economics in Katowice
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 6
• Strony: 81--103

Twórcy

autor

Dorota Górecka

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Bibliografia

• Al-Shemmeri T., Al-Kloub B., Pearman A. (1997): Model Choice in Multicriteria Decision Aid. "European Journal of Operational Research", 97, pp. 550-560.
• Brans J.P., Vincke Ph. (1985): A Preference Ranking Organization Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making. "Management Science", 31, pp. 647-656.
• Brans J.P., Vincke Ph., Mareschal B. (1986): How to Select and How to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method. "European Journal of Operational Research", 24, pp. 228-238.
• Diakoulaki D., Koumoutsos N. (1991): Cardinal Ranking of Alternative Actions: Extension of the PROMETHEE Method. "European Journal of Operational Research", 53, pp. 337-347.
• Edwards W. (1977): How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision-Making. "IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics", SMC 7, pp. 326-340.
• Edwards W., Barron F.H. (1994): SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement. "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process", 60, pp. 306-325.
• Gershon M. (1981): Model Choice in Multi-Objective Decision-Making in Natural Resource Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tuscon.
• Gilliams S., Raymaekers D., Muys B., Van Orshoven J. (2005): Comparing Multiple Criteria Decision Methods to Extend a Geographical Information System on Afforestation. "Computers and Electronics in Agriculture", 49, pp. 142-158.
• Górecka D. (2008): Wielokryterialne wspomaganie wyboru projektów w procesie ubiegania się o współfinansowanie z funduszy Unii Europejskiej. Rozprawa doktorska. Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
• Hwang C., Yoon K. (1981): Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State of the Art Survey. Springer-Verlag, New York.
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979): Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. "Econometrica", 47, pp. 263-291.
• Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1976): Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.
• Konarzewska-Gubała E. (1991): Wspomaganie decyzji wielokryterialnych: system BIPOLAR. Prace Naukowe, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Wrocław.
• Leshno M., Levy H. (2002): Preferred by "All" and Preferred by "Most" Decision Makers: Almost Stochastic Dominance. "Management Science", 48, pp. 1074- 1085.
• Martel J.M. (1998): Multicriterion Analysis under Uncertainty: the Approach of Outranking Synthesis. W: Modelowanie preferencji a ryzyko '98. Red. T. Trzaskalik. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Katowice.
• Martel J.M., Zaraś K. (1995): Stochastic Dominance in Multicriteria Analysis under Risk. "Theory and Decision", 39, pp. 31-49.
• Ministerstwo Gospodarki i Pracy (2004): Podręcznik procedur wdrażania Zintegrowanego Programu Operacyjnego Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa.
• Nowak M. (2004): Preference and Veto Thresholds in Multicriteria Analysis Based on Stochastic Dominance. "European Journal of Operational Research", 158, pp. 339-350.
• Nowak M. (2005): Investment Projects Evaluation by Simulation and Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Procedure. "Journal of Civil Engineering and Management",11, pp. 193-202.
• Rogers M., Bruen M. (1998): A New System for Weighting Environmental Criteria for Use Within ELECTRE III. "European Journal of Operational Research", 107, pp. 552-563.
• Roy B. (1990): Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Wydawnictwa Naukowo- -Techniczne, Warszawa.
• Saaty T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Spector Y., M. Leshno, M. Ben Horin (1996): Stochastic Dominance in an Ordinal World. "European Journal of Operational Research", 93, pp. 620-627.
• Tecle A. (1988): Choice of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Watershed Management. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
• Trzaskalik T., Trzpiot G., Zaraś K. (1998): Modelowanie preferencji z wykorzystaniem dominacji stochastycznych. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Katowice.