European Land Use Patterns

• Autorzy: Jerzy Bański , Emma García-Blanco

Warianty tytułu

Modele użytkowania ziemi w Europie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The following research paper documents the result of a three-year-long applied research project entitled European Land Use Patterns (EU-LUPA), which was carried out under the auspices of the European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) 2013 Programme. The project had a number of overarching goals. The first of these was the creation of cohesive methodology for the analysis of land use in different regions of the European Union. The second was the production of knowledge and valuable information integrating the physical dimension with the socio-economic as well as with environmental protection - knowledge that would allow us to comprehend changing modern-day trends in land use, their dynamics and underlying conditions. The third goal was to identify the main problems and challenges in terms of land use in different territories and regions as well as to identify remediating steps and offer recommendations that would help us resolve these problems. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Land use; Environmental protection; Arable land; Regional diversity

PL

Użytkowanie ziemi; Ochrona środowiska; Grunty rolne; Zróżnicowanie regionalne

• Czasopismo: Studia Obszarów Wiejskich
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 32
• Strony: 264

Twórcy

autor

Jerzy Bański

• Polska Akademia Nauk

autor

Emma García-Blanco

Bibliografia

• Anderson J.R., Hardy E.E., Roach J.T., Witmer R.E., 1976, A Land use and Land Cover Classification System for use with Remote Sensor data, Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
• Begg I., Moore B. Rhodes J., 1986, Economic and social change in urban Britain and the inner cities, [in:] Critical Issues in Urban Economic Development, V Hausner, Critical Issues in Urban Economic Development, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Bertaud A., Bertaud M. ,Wright J., 1988, Efficiency in Land Use and Infrastructure Design An Application of the Bertaud Model, World Bank, INU Discussion Paper.
• Bertaud, A., 2004, The Spatial Structures of Central and Eastern European cities: more European than socialist? In International symposium on post-communist cities the Russian and East European Center (REEC) "Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-communist Cities", 21.
• Böhme K., et al, 2011, How to Strengh then the Territorial Dimension of Europe 2020 and the EU cohesion policy, Ministry of Regional development, Warsaw.
• Böhme K., Gløersen E., 2011, Territorial Cohesion Storylines: Understanding a Policy Concept, Spatial Foresight Briefing 2011, 1, Luxembourg, www.spatialforesight.eu
• Böhme K., Hanell T., Pflanz K., Zillmer S., Niemi P., 2009, ESPON Typology Compilation, Scientific Platform and Tools 2013/3/022 - Interim Report.
• Bossard M., Feranec J., Otahel, J., 2000, Corine land cover technical guide, Technical report, 40, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Caspersen, O., 1999, The European Environment Agency, Global environmental Change, Elsevier, 9, 1, April 1999, p. 71-75.
• CEC, 2006, COM(2005) 718 final - Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment.
• Cheshire P. Hay D., 1989, Urban Problems in Western Europe, Unwin Hyman, London.
• Council of Europe (COE), 1996, Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Nature and Environment, 74, Council of Europe Press.
• Council of Europe (COE), 2000, European Landscape Convention, CETS, 176.
• Council of Europe (COE), 2003, Presentation of the European Landscape Convention Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
• Déjeant-Pons, M., 2006, The European Landscape Convention, Paper Presented at the Forum UNESCO University and Heritage 10th International Seminar "Cultural Landscapes in the 21st Century" Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 11-16 April 2005 Revized: October 2006.
• Dijkstra L., Poelman H.,2008, Remote Rural Regions: How the proximity to a city influences the performances of rural regions, Regional Focus No 1. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/focus/2009_01_metropolitan.pdf
• Diogo, V., Koomen, E., 2010, Explaining land-use change in Portugal 1990-2000, 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2010, Guimarães, Portugal, p. 1-11.
• Dovring, F., 1960, Land and labour in Europe, 1900-1950, M. Nijhoff .
• Eastaway M.P., Berteli T.T., Van Boxmeer B., Ferrando L.G., 2004, Large housing estates in Spain: policies and practice, Series: RESTATE 3th report, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
• EC 2011/0282, 2011b, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
• Environment Council, 2010, Council conclusions on biodiversity post-2010, EU and global vision and targets and international access and burden sharing regime, 3002nd Environment Council meeting Brussels, Belgium, 15 March 2010. (Online) Available at: www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/envir/113346.pdf (accessed 2012-04-10).
• ESPON synthesis report I, 2004, Preliminary results by autumn 2003.
• ESPON ReRISK, 2010, Regions at risk of energy poverty, Final Report 30/07/10.
• ESPON SIESTA, 2012a, Spatial Indicators for a "Europe 2020 Strategy" Territorial Analysis, Draft Final Report 10/08/12.
• ESPON ULYSESS, 2012b, Using applied research results from ESPON as a yardstick for cross-border spatial development planning, Final Report 30/04/12.
• European Commission (EC), 1997, Compendium of European Spatial Planning Systems.
• European Commission (EC), 1999, European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP).
• European Commission (EC), 2008, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, Turning territorial diversity into strength.
• European Commission (EC), 2010a, A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy.
• European Commission (EC), 2010b, Cohesion Policy 2007-2013.
• European Commission (EC), 2010c, Europe 2020 Strategy.
• European Commission (EC), 2010d, Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion.
• European Commission (EC), 2011, A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050.
• European Commission (EC), 2003, Towards a Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources.
• European Commission (EC), 2007, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 2008- 2013.
• European Commission (EC), 2011, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe COM/2011/0571 final.
• European Commission (EC), 2011b, EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 (COM (2011)0244)
• European Commission (EC), 2012a, COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT, Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing Brussels, 15.5.2012 SWD(2012) 101 final/2.
• European Commission (EC), 2012b, The multifunctionality of Green Infrastructure. DG Environment, Indepth report.
• European Council, 2000, Water Framework Directive 2000/60.
• European Council, 2001, The Gothenburg Strategy.
• European Council, 2007a, EU Floods Directive.
• European Council, 2007b, The Lisbon Treaty.
• European Council of Spatial Planners (ECTP-CEU), 2009, New Charter of Athens.
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2009, EEA Strategy 2009-2013 - Multiannual Work Programme.
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2010a, The European environment - state and outlook 2010: synthesis. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2010b, The European environment: state and Outlook 2010, Land use - SOER thematic assessment.
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2011a, Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion, Copenhagen.
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2011b, Land cover country analyses. (Online) Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/land-cover-country-analyses (accessed: 2012-04-15).
• European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2012, Land take GDI 5 March 2012.
• EuskalHiria_Net. Nueva Estrategia Territorial. Diagnostico. Re-estudio de las DOT, 2007, Eusko Jaurlariza.
• Florida. R. 2004, The Rise of the Creative Class, Basic Books, New York.
• Gabrielsen P. 2005, IRENA Indicator Fact Sheet - Intensification/Extensifi cation. EEA/IRENA Forum Archives (Online) Available at: http://archives.eionet.europa.eu/irena/library/development_irena/irena_indicator/intensifi cation-extensif (accessed: 2012-04-20).
• Galera-Lindblom P., Weber R., Reardon M., Schmitt P., 2011, Planning for resource efficient cities: Application of the Metabolic Impact Assessment Tool in Stockholm and Newcastle, Stockholm, Sweden, Nordregio.
• Glaeser E., Kolko J. Saiz A., 2001, Consumer city, Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27-50.
• Glaeser E., 2005, Four Challenges for Scotland's Cities [in:] D. Coyle, W. Alexander, B. Ashcroft (eds.), New Wealth for Old Nations, Scotland's Economic Prospects, Princeton University Press, 73-95, Princeton.
• Green A. Owen D., 1995, The labour market aspects of population change in the 1990s. [in:] R. Hall and P. White (eds.), Europe's Population: Towards the Next Century, UCL Press, London.
• Haber G.C., 1977, Socio-Ecological Dynamics of Wolves and Prey in Subarctic Ecosystem.
• Hahn J., 2011, EU Commissioner for Regional Policy commenting on the ESPON`s benefits to the EU, ESPON High Level Conference on Targeted Analyses, 11/05/2011, Brussels.
• Helming K., Bach H., Dilly O., Hüttl R.F., König B., Kuhlmann T., Perez-Soba M., Sieber S., Smeets P., Tabbush P., Tscherning K., Müller K., Wascher D., Wiggering H., 2008, Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions - the SENSOR approach, [in:] Helming K, Perez-Soba M, Tabbush P, [eds.] Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 56-77.
• Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, (IMM) 2007a, Territorial Agenda of the European Union (TAEU).
• Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, (IMM) 2007b, Action programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union.
• Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, (IMM), 2007c, Leipzig Charter for an integrated sustainable urban development.
• Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion (IMM), 2007d, Territorial Agenda of the European Union (TAEU).
• Jeffreys I., 2004, The Use of Compensatory and Non-compensatory Multi-Criteria Analysis for Small-scale Forestry. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3, 1, 99-117.
• Kasanko, M., Barredo, J.I., Lavalle, C., McCormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris, V., Brezger, A., 2006, Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas, Landscape and Urban Planning, 77, 1-2, 15 June 2006, 111-130.
• Kleeschulte et al., 2011, Integrating nature & biodiversity and land use data - Final Report, Output of the project: INBALUD - Integrating Nature & biodiversity and land use data. GeoVille Environmental Services, Luxembourg.
• Knickel and Mikk, 1999, Linkages between rural development and agri-environmental programme. Development of agri-environmental scheme in Estonia.
• König H., Schuler J., Suarma U., McNeill D., Imbernon J., Damayanti F., Dalimunthe S.A., Uthers S., Sartohadi J., Helming K., Morris J., 2010, Assessing the Impact of Land Use Policy on Urban-Rural Sustainability Using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Sustainability, 2, 7, 1991-2009.
• Kostrowicki J., 1976, Agricultural typology as a tool in planning spatial organization of agriculture-IGU Commission on Agricultural Typology, Geoforum, 7, 3, 241-250.
• Kostrowicki, J., 1982, Land use systems and their impact on environment. An attempt at a classification, Advances in Space Research, 2, 8, 209-215.
• Kostrowicki J., 1991, Trends in the transformation of European agriculture [in:] Brouwer F.M., Th omas A.J., Chadwick M.J., op.cit., p. 2.
• Kostrowicki, J., 1992, Types of Agricultural Map of Europe. Concept, Method, Techniques, [in:] Noor Mohammad,1992, New Dimensions in Agricultural Geography: Historical dimensions of agriculture, Concept's International Series in Geography, 4, New Delhi.
• Krausmanna F., Haberla H., Erba K-H., Wackernagelb M., 2004, Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950-2000: using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability, Land Use policy, 21, 3, July 2004, 215-230.
• Krugman P. 2005, Second winds for industrial regions? [in:] D. Coyle, W. Alexander and B Ashcroft (eds.), New Wealth for Old Nations, Scotland's Economic Prospects, Princeton University Press, 35-47, Princeton.
• Lambin E.F., Geist H, Lepers E., 2003, Dynamics of land use and cover change in tropical regions, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 205-241.
• Lambin E., 2010, Land-use and Land-cover changes, Springer-Verlag Berlin.
• Lambin E.F., Rounsevell M.D.A., Geist H.J., 2000, Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82, 1-3, December 2000, 321-331.
• Land and Ecosystem Accounting, 2010, database version 13, 02/2010
• Lee J., 1991, Land resources, land use and projected land availability for alternative uses in the EC [in:] Brouwer F.M., Th omas A.J., Chadwick M.J., op.cit., p. 40.
• Lepers, Lambin, Janetos, Dfries, Archard, Ramankutty, Scholes, 2010, A Synthesis of Information on Rapid Land-cover Change for the Period 1981-2000.
• McGlade J., 2006, Visions of the future for Europe - Prelude - five scenarios for 2030, Speech at Friends of Europe, Brussels, 29 November 2006 by EEA. Underlining by us.
• Montiel Molina C., 2002, Land tenure as an influence factor on National/Regional forest programmes in Spain, COST E-19, National Forest Programmes in a European Context, Sopron, 28-29 June 2002.
• Moore N., Whelan Y. (eds.) 2007, Heritage, memory and the politics of identity: new perspectives on the cultural landscape.
• Munda G., 2004, Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences, European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662-677.
• Mykolenko L., Raymond T., & Henry P., 1987, Agriculture and the regions: The situation and developments in the enlarged community, The regional impact of the Common Agricultural Policy in Spain and Portugal, SEDES e Sociétéd'Étude pour le dévelopementeconomiqueet social. Luxembourg: EC Official publications.
• Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Hoff man A., Giovannini E., 2005, Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics working paper, Paris.
• Naumann S., Davis M., Kaphengst T., Pieterse M. Rayment M., 2011, Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects, Final report to the EC, DG Environment.
• O'Rourke, M., 2008, Landscape Planning and Land Use Planning: Defi nitions, History and Roles [in:] Landscape Planning and Land Use Planning: Definitions, History and Roles, http://www.asla.org/ppn/Article.aspx?id=15112
• Øresund Trends, 2010, Birgitte Steenstrup and http://www.tendensoresund.org/en
• Paracchini M.L., Pacini C., Jones L., Pérez-Soba M., 2011, An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options, Journal Ecological Indicators, 11, 1, 71-80.
• Paracchini M.L., Pacini C., Laurence M., Jones M., Pérez-Soba, M., 2011, An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options, Ecological Indicators, 11, 1, January 2011, Elsevier, 71-80.
• Pedroli B. (ed.), 2000, Landscape - Our Home / Lebensraum Landschaft. Essays on the Culture of the European Landscape as a Task, Indigo, Zeist.
• Pérez-Soba M., Petit S., Jones L., Bertrand N., Briquel V., Omodei-Zorini L., Contini C., Helming K., Farrington J. H., Tinacci Mossello M., Wascher D., Kienast F., De Groot R., 2008, Land use functions: a multi-functionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability, [In:] Helming K., Pérez-Soba M., Tabbush P. (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes, Berlin (Springer), 375-404.
• Petrzelka P., Korsching P.F., Malia J.E., 1996, Farmers' Attitudes and BehaviorToward Sustainable Agriculture, Journal of Environmental Education, 28, 1, 38-44.
• Piorr Ravetz, J Tosics I., 2011, Peri-urbanization in Europe: Towards a European Policy to sustain Urban-Rural Futures, University of Copenahge / Academic Books Life Sciences.
• Plieninger T., Schaar M., 2008, Modification of land cover in a traditional agroforestry system in Spain: processes of tree expansion and regression, Ecology and Society 13(2): 25. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol13/iss2/art25/
• Plummer M. L. 2009, Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 7, 1, 38-45.
• Prokop G., Jobstmann H., Schönbauer A., 2011, Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27, European Commission - DG Environment.
• Reenberg A., 2009, Land system science: Handling complex series of natural and socio-economic processes, Journal of Land Use Science, 4,1-2, 1-4.
• Reidsma P., König H., Feng S., 2011, Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries, Land Use Policy. Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.009.
• Renetzeder C., Eupen M. van Mücher S., Wrbka T., 2008, A Spatial Regional Reference Framework for Sustainability Assessment in Europe, [in:] Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds.) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes, Berlin (Springer), 249-268.
• Renetzeder C., Schindler S., Peterseil J., Prinz M.A., Mücher S., Wrbka T., 2010, Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land use intensity at regional, national and European level, Ecological Indicators, 10, 1, January 2010, 39-48, Landscape Assessment for Sustainable Planning.
• Rice P., Venables A. Pattachini E. 2006, Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the UK regions, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
• Rivolin J. U., Faludi A., 2005, Regional perspectives on European spatial planning, The Future of the ESDP in the framework of Territorial Cohesion, disP 161. 2/2005 19.
• Rosenthal S., Strange W., 2004, Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies, [in:] V. Henderson, J. Thisse (eds.), Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, 4, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
• Stankowski S.J., Trenton N.J., 1972, Population density as an indirect indicator of Urban and Suburban land-surface modifications, U.S. Geological Survey professional papers - Geological Survey Research.
• Storper M., Manville M., 2006, Behaviour, Preferences and Cities, Urban Studies. 43, 8, 1247-1274.
• Turner II B.L., Lambin E.F., Reenberg A., 2007, The Emergence of Land Change Science for Global Environmental Change and Sustainability, PNAS 104(52):20666-20671.
• UNECE, 1998, Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision- making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention).
• Velthof G.L., Oudendag D., Witzke H.P., Asman W.A.H., Klimont Z. Oenema O., 2009, Integrated Assessment of Nitrogen Losses from Agriculture in EU- 27 using MITERRA-EUROPE, Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 2, 402-417.
• Verburg, van de Steeg, Veldkamp, Willemen, 2008, From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3, March 2009, 1327-1335.
• Wiggering H., Dalchow C., Glemnitz M., Helming K., Müller K., Schulz A., Stachow U., Zander P., 2006, Indicators for multifunctional land use - Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials, Ecological Indicators, 6, 238-249.
• Zasada I., Fertner C., Piorr A., Nielsen T., 2011, Peri-urbanization and multifunctional adaptation of agriculture around Copenhagen, Geografisk Tidsskrift, 111(1), 59-72.