Local Government Systems and Decentralization : Evidence from Pakistan's Devolution Plan

• Autorzy: Muhammad Shakil Ahmad , Noraini Bt. Abu Talib
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The discourse of governance and development practitioners continues to embrace community participation and community empowerment as an elementary means of building local capacity for poverty reduction, development and change at the local level. This article is a review of the decentralization initiatives of local government systems after the announcement of the devolution plan in Pakistan. It evaluates the initiatives' participatory methods to ascertain the extent to which they have improved the process of community development at the local level. This article also measures the impact of community empowerment on the sustainability of community-driven projects implemented under the decentralization initiative through community-based organizations known as Citizen Community Boards (CCBs). Document analysis and literature review methodologies were employed to gain further insight into the decentralization phenomenon in Pakistan. The results describe human development, improvements in community empowerment and the sustainability of local projects; however, the sense of community has yet to be translated into shared benefits for rural communities. The fundamental goal of decentralization seems to be elusive because only power was transferred to the local level, whereas there is little support for community capacity building and community access to resources and the elites still control the electoral process. It is argued that community development initiatives in Pakistan require continuous support from local governments to boost local rural economies. Likewise, community-local government participatory development strategies can lead to strong local ownership and empowerment in rural communities. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Decentralization; Empowerment of society; Development

PL

Decentralizacja; Upodmiotowienie społeczeństwa; Rozwój

• Czasopismo: Contemporary Economics
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 7
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 33--43

Twórcy

autor

Muhammad Shakil Ahmad

• Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

autor

Noraini Bt. Abu Talib

• COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Pakistan

Bibliografia

• Agrawal, A., & Gupta, K. (2005). Decentralization and Participation: The Governance of Common Pool Resources in Nepal's Terai. World Development, 33(7), 1101-1114.
• Ahmad, M. S., & Talib, N. B. A. (2010a). Decentralization initiatives, Economic and Community Development in Pakistan. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(4), 380-386.
• Ahmad, M. S., & Talib, N. B. A. (2010b). Improvement of project sustainability by community participation: A case of Abbottabad District in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 4(17), 3761-3768.
• Ahmad, M. S., & Talib, N. B. A. (2011). Decentralization and participatory rural development: A literature review. Contemporary Economics, 5(4), 58-67.
• Alderman, H. (2002). "Do Local Officials Know Something We Don't? Decentralization of Targeted Transfers in Albania". Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 375-404.
• Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring Empowerment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3510), World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdf
• Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2004). The politics of decentralized natural resource governance. Political Science and Politics, 37(3), 421-426.
• Andrews, C. W., & de Vries, M. S. (2007). High expectations, varying outcomes: decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 424-451.
• Anjum, Z. (2001). New Local Government System: A Step towards Community Empowerment. Pakistan Development Review, 40(4), 845-867.
• Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185-205.
• Blair, H. (2000). Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development, 28(1), 21-39.
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social Capital And Community Governance. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F419-F436.
• Buss, T. F., Marcela, T., & Redburn, F. S. (2011). Economic Development, Citizen Participation. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition (pp. 569-576). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
• Campbell, A., Hughes, J., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. (2010). Social capital as a mechanism for building a sustainable society in Northern Ireland. Community Development Journal, 45(1), 22-38.
• Cheema, A., & Mohmand, S. (2007). Decentralisation and Inequality in Pakistan: Bridging the Gap that Divides?. In M. A. Saqib (Ed.), Devolution and Governance: Reforms in Pakistan (pp. 167-178). Karachi: Oxford University Press.
• Corbett, J., & Keller, P. (2004). Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: observations from two communities in Indonesia. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(2), 25-44.
• Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2010). Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Development Journal, 45(1), 5-21.
• DTCE (2010). DTCE Monthly Progress Report - As on 30th September 2010. Islamabad: Devolution trust of Community Empowerment.
• Dongier, P., Domelen, J. V., Ostrom, E., Ryan, A., Wakeman, W., Bebbington, A., Alkire, S., Esmail, T., Polski, M. (2003). Community Driven Development In J. Klugman (Ed.), A Sourcebook for Poverty Reduction Strategies Vol. 1: Core Techniques and Cross-Cutting Issues (pp. 301-331). Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Duncana, S., & Goodwina, M. (2008). Local economic policies: Local regeneration or political mobilization. Local Government Studies, 11(6), 75-96.
• Fox, W., & Meyer, I. H. (1995). Public Administration Dictionary. Cape Town: Juta.
• Fraser, H. (2005). Four Different Approaches to Community Participation. Community Development Journal, 40(3), 286-300.
• George, M. G., & Costel, D. T. (2011). Capital Programming and Budgeting: Comparative Local Government Perspectives Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition (pp. 270-278), London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
• Gutberlet, J. (2009). Solidarity economy and recycling co-ops: micro-credit to alleviate poverty. Development in Practice, 19(6), 737-751.
• Hankla, C., & Downs, W. (2010). Decentralisation, Governance and the Structure of Local Political Institutions: Lessons for Reform? Local Government Studies, 36(6), 759-783.
• Hayami, Y., & Godo, Y. (2005). Development Economics: From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations. Agosto: Oxford University Press.
• Hjorth, P. (2003). Knowledge development and management for urban poverty alleviation. Habitat International, 27(3), 381-392.
• Kakumba, U. (2010). Local government citizen participation and rural development: reflections on Uganda's decentralization system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(1), 171-186.
• Khwaja, A. I. (2004). "Is Increasing Community Participation Always a Good Thing?". Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3), 427-436.
• Kurosaki, T. (2005). Determinants of Collective Action under Devolution Initiatives: The Case of Citizen Community Boards in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 44(3), 253-270.
• Kurosaki, T. (2006). Community and Economic Development in Pakistan: The Case of Citizen Community Boards in Hafizabad and a Japanese Perspectives. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(4), 575-585.
• Laverack, G. (2001). An identification and interpretation of the organizational aspects of community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 36(2), 134-145.
• Laverack, G. (2006). Using a 'domains' approach to build community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 41(1), 4-12.
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2003). Evaluating Community-Based and Community-Driven Development: A Critical Review of the Evidence (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3209), World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECAREGTOPCOMDRIDEV/Resources/DECstudy.pdf
• Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477-491
• Narayan, D., & Petesch, P. (2002). Voices of the Poor: From Many Lands. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• National Reconstruction Bureau (2000). The Local Government Plan 2000. Retrieved from http://www.nrb.gov.pk/publications/LG_Final_Plan_2000.pdf
• National Reconstruction Bureau (2001). The Local Government System 2001. Retrieved from http://www.nrb.gov.pk/local_government/default.asp
• Patrick, W. O., & Scott, F. (2011). Decentralization in Developing Countries In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition (pp. 498-503). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
• Paul, O. (2010). Pakistan: Devolution and Community Empowerment. South Asian Journal, 65-84.
• Power, G., Khatun, S., & Debeljak, K. (2011). Citizen Access to Information: Capturing the Evidence across Zambia, Ghana and Kenya: Handbook of Global Media Research. London: Wiley Blackwell.
• Roche, B. (2010). New directions in Community-based Research. Toronto, ON: Wellesley Institute
• . Rondinelli, D. (2006). Decentralization and Development'. In A. S. Haque & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International Development Governance (pp. 395- 417). London, UK: Taylor and Francis
• Rondinelli, D. A. (1980). Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Theory and Practice in Developing Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47, 133-145.
• Saegaert, S. (2006). Building civic capacity in urban neighborhoods: an empirically grounded anatomy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 275-294.
• Salmon, A. (2007). Walking the talk: how participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 982-993.
• Schulz, A., Israel, B. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. Checkoway, B. N. (1995). Empowerment as a multi-level construct: perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Education Research, 10(3), 309-327.
• Sidorenko, A. (2006). Empowerment & participation in policy action on ageing. UN Program on Ageing. Unpublished paper presented at the The International Design for All Conference 2006, Rovaniemi, Finland.
• Speer, P. W., Jackson, C. B., & Peterson, N. A. (2001). The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: support and new implications for theory. Health Education and Behavior, 28(6), 716-732.
• Wallerstein, N. (2006, February 11). What is the Evidence on Effectiveness of Empowerment to Improve Health?. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf
• Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis, In J. Rappaport and E. Seidman, (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43-63). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
• ---

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5709/ce.1897-9254.72