Znaczenie megainstytucji finansowych w świetle ryzyka systemowego

• Autorzy: Julita Majczyk

Warianty tytułu

A Hidden Secret of the Systemically Important Financial Institutions and Ignored Cassandra's Prophetic Warning

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem pracy jest pokazanie roli ryzyka systemowego na globalnym rynku finansowym. Na podstawie analizy literatury przedmiotu pokazano czym jest ryzyko systemowe i jakie mogą być konsekwencje jego wystąpienia. Praca bada również potencjalne skutki ryzyka kreowanego przez megainstytucje finansowe o znaczeniu systemowym. Rozważania dotyczą kategorii tych instytucji oraz kryteriów, na podstawie których podmioty finansowe zaliczane są do tych systemowo ważnych. Niniejszą pracę kończy dyskusja na temat wpływu ujawnienia tożsamości banków systemowo ważnych na globalny system finansowy. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of the paper is to examine impact of systemic risk on global financial market. The literature analysis shows the nature of systemic risk and its possible consequences. It explains also the potential effects of risk emerging from the systemically important financial institutions. The paper discusses particular categories of such institutions and an assessment methodology for systemic importance. The paper concludes with a discussion on the impact of the published list of global systemically important banks to the global financial system. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Instytucje finansowe; Ryzyko systemowe; Rynki finansowe

EN

Financial institutions; Systemic risk; Financial markets

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie i Finanse
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: R. 10, nr 4, cz. 1
• Strony: 495--508

Twórcy

autor

Julita Majczyk

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• Acharya V.V. (2009), A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation, "Journal of Financial Stability" Vol. 5/3.
• Acharya V.V., M. Richardson (2009), Restoring Financial Stability. How to Repair a Failed System, Wiley Finance, New Jersey.
• Ackermann J.M. (2011), UPDATE 2-Systemic banks too hard to define - lobby chairman, 23 marzec 2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/23/deutschebank-sifis-idUSLDE72M24P20110323?pageNumber=1, dostęp dnia 20.06.2012.
• An Act to Promote the Financial Stability of the United States by Improving Accountability and Transparency in the Financial System, to End ''Too Big to Fail'', to Protect the American Taxpayer by Ending Bailouts, to Protect Consumers from Abusive Financial Services Practices, and for Other Purposes, Pub.L. 111-203,H.R. 4173.
• BIS (2010), The Basel Committee's Response to the Financial Crisis: Report to the G20, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel, 10.2010.
• BIS (2011), Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement. Rules text, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel, November 2011.
• Brunnermeier M., et. al. (2009), The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation. Geneva Reports on the World Economy 11, International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva.
• Fed (2011), Large Commercial Banks, The Federal Reserve Board, Washington, September 30, 2011, http://federalreserve.gov/ releases/lbr/20111231/default.htm, dostęp dnia 17.06.2012.
• FSB (2011), Policy Measures to Address Systemically Important Financial Institutions, Financial Stability Board, Basel, November 2011.
• FSB, IMF, BIS (2009), Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations. Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Governors, Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, October 2009.
• Goldstein M., N. Véron (2011), Too Big to Fail: The Transatlantic Debate, "Working Paper Series" No. WP11-2.
• Jenkins S., S.J. Davis (2009), Thirty financial groups on systemic risk list, "Finacial Times", November 2009, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c680e0da-dd4e-11de-ad60-00144feabdc0.html