Implementation of Multi-Objective Evaluation Method in Public Debt Risk Management

• Autorzy: Jelena Stankevičienė , Sergej Rosov
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Objective: The paper is devoted to propose a public debt risk assessment model, which allows predicting country's economic well-being trends. The proposed model evaluates different aspects of public debt-related structural indicators.

Research Design & Methods: Introduced debt risk assessment model uses MULTIMOORA multi-objective evaluation method. Study is based on the 2005-2010 European Union macroeconomic structural indicators.

Findings: The data analysis indicates EU's ability to cope with the increasing level of public debt and predict long term fiscal consequences. Implications & Recommendations: Evaluation of research results enables to use multi-objective evaluation method to determine the risk of public debt.

Contribution & Value Added: A ranking index which shows early warning signs of fiscal indebtedness problems for European Union countries is introduced in the paper. Periodical use of proposed model would help to predict incoming recessions and to implement specific fiscal policies in time to prevent them. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Public debt; Risk; Structural indicators

PL

Dług publiczny; Ryzyko; Wskaźniki strukturalne

• Czasopismo: Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 1
• Numer: nr 4 Modern Challenges for Business and Economy in CEE Countries
• Strony: 7--19

Twórcy

autor

Jelena Stankevičienė

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

autor

Sergej Rosov

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• Adam, C. S., & Bevan D. L. (2005). Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 571-597.
• Alesina, A., M. de Broeck, Prati, A., & Tabellini, G. (1992). Default risk on government debt in OECD Countries. Economic Policy: A European Forum, October, 427-463.
• Balezentis, A., & Balezentis, T. (2011). An innovative multi-criteria supplier selection based on twotuple MULTIMOORA and hybrid data. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 45(2), 37-56.
• Balezentis, A., Balezentis, T., & Valkauskas, R. (2010). Evaluating situation of Lithuania in the European Union: structural indicators and MULTIMOORA method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(4), 578-602.
• Brauers, W. K. M. (2004). Multiobjective optimization (MOO) in privatization. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 5(2), 59-66.
• Brauers, W. K. M. (2008). Multi-objective decision making by reference point theory for a wellbeing economy. International Journal of Operations Research, 8, 89-104.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Ginevicius, R. (2010). The economy of the Belgian regions tested with MULTIMOORA. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 173-209.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas E. K. (2010). Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 5-24.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas E. K. (2010). Robustness in the MULTIMOORA model, the case of Tanzania. Transformations in Business and Economy, 9(3), 67-83.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445-469.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2011). MULTIMOORA optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(1), 174-188.
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multiobjective optimization. Informatica, 23(1), 1-25.
• Brauers, W. K. M., Balezentis, A., & Balezentis, T. (2011). MULTIMOORA for the EU member states updated with fuzzy number theory. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 259-290.
• Brauers, W. K. M., Ginevicius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2010). Regional development in Lithuania considering multiple objectives by the MOORA method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(4), 613-640.
• Commission of the European Communities. (1992). Treaty on European Union, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• Diamond, P. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126-1150.
• DiPeitro, W. R., & Anoruo, E. (2012). Government size, public debt and real economic growth: a panel analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(4), 410-419.
• Garcia, M., & Rigobon, R. (2004). A Risk Management Approach to Emerging Market's Sovereign Debt Sustainability with an Application to Brazilian Data. NBER Working Paper No. 10336. National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Ginevičius, R., & Podviezko, A. (2013). The evaluation of financial stability and soundness of Lithuanian banks. Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(2), 191-208.
• Hemming, R., Kell, M., & Schimmelpfenning, A. (2003). Fiscal Vulnerability and Financial Crises in Emerging Market Economies. Occasional Paper 218, International Monetary Fund.
• Karlin, S., & Studden, W. J. (1966). Tchebycheff Systems: with Applications in Analysis and Statistics. New York: Interscience Publishers.
• Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.
• Kildiene, S. (2013). Assessment of Opportunities for Construction Enterprises, In: European Union Member States Using the MULTIMOORA Method. 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, Procedia Engineering 57, 557-564.
• Kracka, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Panel building refurbishment elements effective selection by applying multiple-criteria methods. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 17(2), 210-219.
• Kumar, M. S., & Woo, J. (2010). Public Debt and Growth. IMF Working Papers, No. 10/174.
• Miller, D. W., & Starr, M. K. (1969). Executive Decisions and Operations Research. 2nd Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Modigliani, F. (1961). Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt. Economic Journal, 71(284), 730-755.
• Nelson, R. M. (2011). Sovereign Debt (SD) in Advanced Economies: Overview and Issues for Congress. DIANE Publishing.
• Nelson, R. M., Belkin, P., & Mix, D. E. (2010, April). Greece's debt crisis: Overview, policy responses, and implications. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-578.
• Rutkauskas, A. V. (2013). Integrated management of migration, employment, fiscal policy and public debt. Business, Management and Education, 11(2), 376-390.
• Thomas, D. (2013). Sovereign debt restructuring in the Eurozone: a Polanyian reading of private law enforcement. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 62, 135-160.
• Van Delft, A., & Nijkamp, P. (1977). The use of hierarchical optimization criteria in regional planning. Journal of Regional Science, 17, 195-205.
• Wood, R. (2012). Delivering economic stimulus, addressing rising public debt and avoiding inflation, Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 4(1), 4-24.