Analiza obciążenia pracą metodą OWAS

• Autorzy: Andrzej M. Lasota

Warianty tytułu

Workload Analysis with the OWAS Method

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem pracy jest ocena obciążenia pracowników, analiza czynników ryzyka z zastosowaniem metody OWAS. (fragment tekstu)

EN

Production systems are a combination of physical elements such as machinery, equipment, tools and (most importantly) people. Furthermore, systems depen- dent on human.operators are particularly vulnerable to problems associated with discomfort. This affects production quality and causes an increase in training costs and absente- eism. In addition, work performed by people is accompanied by physical effort, which can lead to the appearance of musculoskeletal discomfort (MSDs) among employees in the form of health problems. Factors influencing the risk of MSDs include employee posture at work, range of motion, strength, repetition and duration. The posture of a worker is affected by factors such as the job performed, workstation, work tools, their design and the anthropometric characteristics of employees. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the workload of employees and analyse risk factors using the OWAS method. Research sample: 122 postures of employees at work in manufacturing companies in selected workplaces were evaluated. Among the evaluated employees were machine operators (lathes, milling machines, bending machines) which represented 48 postures (39% of all postures); packers . 30 postures (25%); fitters engaged in manual assembly . 27 postures (22%), and other workers who do manual work . postures 17 (14%). Method: The observation technique used was the OWAS method (Ovako Working Posture Analysis System) to allow assessment of the level of exposure to the risk of MSDs and the level of ergonomic interventions in the form of action categories (AC). Results: AC 1: 35% of all respondent postures, of which: 38% of the postures belonged to operators, 27% packers, 41% assemblers and 35% other employees. AC 2: 45% of all respondents postures (48%, 47%, 48%, 29%; of operators, packers, assemblers and other employees, respectively). AC 3: 12% of all respondents. postures, in which: 10% of the postures were of operators, 13% packers, 11% assemblers and 18% of the postures were of other employees. AC 4: 7% of all respondents. postures, of which: 13% were operators. postures, 0% packers. postures, 18% assemblers. postures and 7% of the postures were of other employees. Conclusions: 35% of the evaluated postures do not require ergonomic intervention. However, 19% of postures are associated with a significant risk of MSDs and need ergonomic attention soon/immediately. Improperly maintained back position (71% postures), shoulder (20% postures), legs (30% postures) and excessive external load (6% postures). Ergonomic intervention is necessary, related to the redesign of jobs, methods of work, workplace and the organizational positions. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Praca; Obciążenie pracą; Ergonomia

EN

Labour; Workload; Ergonomics

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem / Polskie Towarzystwo Zarządzania Produkcją
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 35--39

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej M. Lasota

• Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

Bibliografia

• Battini D., Faccio M., Persona A., Sgarbossa F.: New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 41(1)/2011, pp. 30-42.
• Black J.T.: Design rules for implementing the Toyota Production System. .International Journal of Production Research. 45(16)/2007, pp. 3639-3664.
• Calvo A.: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) risks in forestry: a case study to propose an analysis method. .Agricultural Engineering International. 11/2009, pp.1682-1698.
• Carrasco C., Coleman N., Healey S.: Packing products for customers: an ergonomics evaluation of three supermarket checkouts. .Applied Ergonomics. 26/1995, pp. 101-8.
• Cimino A., Longo F., Mirabelli G.: A multimeasure based methodology for the ergonomic effective design of manufacturing system Workstation. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 39(2)/2009, pp. 447-455.
• Engels J.A., Landeweerd J.A., Kant Y.: An OWAS-based analysis of nurses. working postures. .Ergonomics.37/1994, pp. 909-19.
• Ferreira J., Hignett S.: Reviewing ambulance design for clinical efficiency and paramedic safety. .Applied Ergonomics. 36(1)/2005, pp. 97-105.
• Gangopadhyay S., Das T., Ghoshal G., Ghosh T.: Work organization in sand core manufacturing for health and productivity. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 36(10)/2006, pp. 915-920.
• Genaidy A.M., Al-Shed A.A., Karwowski W.: Postural stress analysis in industry. .Applied Ergonomics. 25/1994, pp. 77-87.
• Gonzalez B.A., Adenso-Diaz B., Torre P.G.: Ergonomic performance and quality relationship: an empirical evidence case. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 31/2003, pp. 33-40.
• Hallbeck M.S., Bosch T., Van Rhijn G. (J. W.), Krause F., de Looze M.P., Vink P.: A Tool for Early Workstation Design for Small and Medium Enterprises Evaluated in Five Cases. .Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 20(4)/2010, pp. 300-315.
• Hignett S., McAtamney L.: Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). .Applied Ergonomics. 31/2000, pp. 201-5.
• Hignett S.: Postural analysis of nursing work. .Applied Ergonomics. 27/1996, pp. 171-6.
• Hirose M., Deffaux G., Nakagaki Y.: A study on data input of natural human motion for virtual reality system. Dostępny w Internecie: http://vrsj.ime.cmc.osa-ka-u.ac.jp/ic-at/papers/95245.pdf, dostęp 2013.01.04.
• Hsu Y-W., Chung Y-C., Chiu C-C., Chen C-P., Tsai C-H.: A study of the ergonomics evaluation of a water heater.s case manufacturing factory, .Asian Journal on Quality. 9(1)/2008, pp. 22-40.
• Istota inżynierii produkcji. Komitet Inżynierii Produkcji, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warszawa 2012. Dostępny w Internecie: http://www.kip.pan.pl/images/ stories/zdjecia/wydawnictwa/ekspertyza.pdf, dostęp 2013.01.11.
• Joode B.W., Burdorf A., Verspuy C.: Physical load in ship maintenance: hazard evaluation by means of a workplace survey. .Applied Ergonomics. 28/1997, pp. 213-9.
• Karhu O., Kansi P., Kuorinka I.: Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. .Applied Ergonomics. 8/1977, pp. 199-201.
• Kasvi J.J., Vartiainen M., Pulkkis A., Nieminen M.: The role of information support systems in the joint Optimization of work systems. .Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing. 10(2)/2000, pp. 193-221.
• Kee D., Karwowski W.: A comparison of three observational techniques for assessing postural loads in industry. .International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 13(1)/2007, pp. 3-14.
• Kilbom A.: Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders . what information can be obtained from systematic observations? .Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment& Health. 20/1994, pp. 30-45, Special issue.
• Kivi P., Mattila M.: Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerized OWAS method. .Applied Ergonomics. 22/1991, pp. 43-8.
• Kumar S.A.: conceptual model of overexertion, safety, and risk of injury in occupational settings. .Humn Factors. 36(2)/1994, pp. 197-209.
• Lamkull D., Hanson L., Ortengren R.: A compareative study of digital human modelling simulation results and their outcomes in reality: A case study within manual assembly of automobiles. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 39/2009, pp. 428-441.
• Lasota A.: Dolegliwości mięśniowo-szkieletowe szwaczek maszynowych, [w:] Obciążenie układu ruchu. Przyczyny i skutki, red. R. Paluch i in. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław 2008, s. 151-161.
• Lasota A.: Dolegliwości zdrowotne projektantów pracujących na stanowiskach pracy wyposażonych w komputery. .Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie. 33/2001, s. 73-77.
• Lasota A.: Ergonomiczna ocena dolegliwości mięśniowo-szkieletowych operatorów stanowisk dyspozytorskich, [w:] Dolegliwości zdrowotne a warunki pracy, red. E. Kowal. Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2008, s. 21-25.
• Lasota A.: REBA - metoda oceny obciążenia i ryzyka zawodowego spowodowanego sposobem wykonywania pracy, [w:] Zarządzanie ryzykiem zawodowym w miejscu pracy, red. A. Rabenda. Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2006, s. 127-140.
• Li K. W., Lee C-L.: Postural analysis of four jobs on two building construction sites: an experience of using the OWAS method in Taiwan. .Journal of Occupational Health. 41/1999, pp. 183-190.
• Massaccesi M., Pagnotta A., Soccetti A., Masali M., Masiero C., Greco F.: Investigation of work-related disorders in trunk drivers. .Applied Ergonomics. 34/ 2003, pp. 303-7.
• McAtamney L., Corlett E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. .Applied Ergonomics. 24/1993, pp.91-9.
• Minami H., Nishimura T., Seo A., Doi H.: Development of a new method for ergonomic usability and workload evaluation for digital human, Asia Paciffic Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference 2009, pp.1878-1883, 2009. Dostępny w Internecie: http://www.knu.edu.tw/lecture/%/APIMES2009/Papers/345.pdf, dostęp 2013.02.06.
• Muthukumar K., Sankaranarayanasamy K., Ganguli A.K.: Analysis of frequency, intensity, and interference of discomfort in computerized numeric control machine operations. .Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 00(0)/2012, pp. 1-8.
• Quansah R.: Harmful postures and musculoskeletal symptoms among fish trimmers of a fish processing factory in Ghana: a preliminary investigation. .International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics (JOSE). 11(2)/2005, pp. 181-90.
• Ryan G.A.: The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in supermarket workers. .Ergonomics. 32/1989, pp. 359-71.
• Scott G.B., Lambe N.R.: Working practices in a perchery system, using the OVAKO Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS). .Applied Ergonomics. 27/1996, pp. 281-4.
• Sesek R., Gilkey D., Rosecrance J., Guzy A.: The Utility of OWAS in Auto Manufacturing Assembly Job Evaluations, 2nd Annual Regional National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) Young/New Investigators Symposium, Salt Lake City, April 16, 2004.
• Tytyk E.: Projektowanie ergonomiczne. PWN, Warszawa-Poznañ 2001.
• Vieira E.R., Kumar S.: Working postures: a literature review. .Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 14(2)/2004, pp. 143-59.
• Wang H., Hwang J., Lee K-S., Kwag J-S., Jang J-S., Jung M-C.: Upper body and finger posture evaluations at an electric iron assembly plant. .Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 00 (0)/2012, pp. 1-11.
• Westgaard R.H., Winkel J.: Ergonomic intervention research for improved musculoskeletal health: A critical review. .International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 20/1997, pp. 463-500.
• Wright E.J., Haslam R.A.: Manual handling risks and controls in a soft drinks distribution centre. .Applied Ergonomics. 30/1999, pp. 311-8.