PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 8 | nr 1 Technology Entrepreneurship | 84--115
Tytuł artykułu

Internal Factors of Academic Entrepreneurship : the Case of Four Malaysian Public Research Universities

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper focused on academic entrepreneurship, an emerging phenomenon in Malaysian public research universities. The research demonstrated that academic entrepreneurship produced positive impact on research commercialization and university technology transfer for these public research universities. Academic entrepreneurship was also found to be one of the missing gaps in fulfilling the complete process of research and development up to commercialization. This study provided evidence of the appropriateness of using an organizational framework of academic entrepreneurship to measure the influence of the internal environment in stimulating the level of academic entrepreneurship. The results demonstrated that control systems, organizational culture, human resource management systems and entrepreneurial leadership behaviour were key predictors of academic entrepreneurship in these universities. (original abstract)
Artykuł koncentruje się na przedsiębiorczości akademickiej w publicznych uniwersytetach Malezji. Zgodnie z dotychczasowymi badaniami, przedsiębiorczość akademicka ma pozytywny wpływ na komercjalizację badań i transfer technologii w malezyjskich publicznych uniwersytetach. Wskazuje się ponadto na rolę przedsiębiorczej aktywności jako łącznika między badaniami naukowymi i ich rynkową komercjalizacją. Na podstawie badań własnych, Autorzy artykułu stwierdzili wpływ wewnętrznych czynników organizacyjnych na poziom rozwoju przedsiębiorczości akademickiej w badanych uniwersytetach. Wykazano, że systemy kontroli, kultura organizacyjna, zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi i przywództwo były kluczowymi predykatorami przedsiębiorczej aktywności w analizowanych uczelniach. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Twórcy
autor
  • Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia
  • Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia
Bibliografia
  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
  • Brennan, M.C., Wall, A.P., & McGowan, P. (2005). Academic entrepreneurship: Assessing preferences in nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(3), 307-322.
  • Brennan, M.C., & McGowan, P. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 12(3), 144-164.
  • Busenitz, L.W., West, III, G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
  • Bygrave, W.D. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm: A philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7-26.
  • Chrisman, J.J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281.
  • Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, available online 29 June 2011.
  • EPU 2006. Ninth Malaysian Plan 2006-2010. Putrajaya: The Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister`s Department.
  • EPU 2010. Tenth Malaysian Plan 2011-2015. Putrajaya: The Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister`s Department.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as `quasi-firms`: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109-121.
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R & D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
  • Gregoire, D.A., Noel, M.X., Dery, R., & Bechard, J. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 333- 373.
  • Hair, J.F., Jr., Bush, R.P., & Ortinau, D.J. (2000). Marketing research: A practical approach for the new millennium. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  • Hair, J.F., Jr., Bush, R.P., & Ortinau, D.J. (2009). Marketing research: In a digital information environment. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  • Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko, D.F., & Zahra, S.A. (2002). Middle managers` perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253-273.
  • Ireland, R.D., Kuratko, D.F., & Morris, M.H. (2006a). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: Innovation at all levels, part I. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(1), 10- 17.
  • Ireland, R.D., Kuratko, D.F., & Morris, M.H. (2006b). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: Innovation at all levels, part II. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(2), 21-30.
  • Kirby, D.A. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599-603.
  • Kuratko, D.F., & Hornsby, J.S. (1998). Corporate entrepreneurial leadership for the 21st century. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 5(2), 27-39.
  • Llano, J.A. (2006). The university environment and academic entrepreneurship: A behavioral model for measuring environment success. Technology Transfer Society Conference, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA, September 27-29.
  • Meyer, G.D., Neck, H.M., & Meeks, M.D. (2002). The entrepreneurship-strategic management interface. In M.A. Hitt, R.D. Ireland, S.M. Camp & D.L. Sexton (Eds), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 19-38). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., &Covin, J.G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation (2nd edition).Thomson South-Western.
  • O`Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., O`Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2004). Universities technology transfer: A review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2), 11-29.
  • Powers, J.B., & McDougall, P.P. (2005). Universities start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311.
  • Sadler, R. (2001). A framework for the emergence of entrepreneurship and innovation in education, Conference paper for the Centre for the Economics of Education and Training. Retrieved June 20, 2007 from http://www.education.monash.edu.au/ centres/ceet/ docs/conferencepapers/2001confpapersadler.pdf
  • Schildt, H.A., Zahra, S.A., &Silanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,30(3), 399-415.
  • Schneider, B. (1978). Organizational climate: An essay. Personnel Psychology 28, 447-479.
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217- 226.
  • Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17-27.
  • Röpke, J. (1998). The entrepreneurial university, innovation, academic knowledge creation and regional development in a globalized economy. Working paper Department of Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, 1S. Retrieved February 2S February, 2OO7 from http://www.wiwi.uni-marburg.de/Lehrstuehle/ VWL/WitheoS/documents/entreuni.pdf.
  • Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Towards a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
  • Thornberry, N. (2006). Lead like an Entrepreneur, New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J.B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101-125.
  • Wood, M.S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153-161.
  • Yusof, M., Siddiq, M.S., & Mohd Nor, L. (2009). An integrated model of a university`s entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 5(l), 57- 77.
  • Yusof, M., Mohd Nor, L., & Siddiq, M.S. (2010). Organizational antecedents of academic entrepreneurship in Malaysian public research universities. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 43-68.
  • Yusof, M., & Jain, K.K. (2010). Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: A literature survey, The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6 (1), 8l-96.
  • Zahra, S.A. (1996). Governance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1713-1735.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171304721

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.