PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 2 | nr 2 | 129--138
Tytuł artykułu

Determination of the Relevant Market as a Criterion of Assessment of Concentration Effects in the Practice of Antitrust Authorities

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Determining the relevant market is the first and the most important step in antimonopoly proceedings due to the fact that the market position of an enterprise is always determined from the relevant market perspective. In respect of mergers, establishing the relevant market is essential in analysing whether the aim of the concentration is to distort and limit competition on the market. The author of the article focuses on describing methods for determining the relevant market applied by antimonopoly authorities. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
2
Numer
Strony
129--138
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
  • T Skoczny, Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz (CH Beck 2009) 208-209.
  • T Rosenthal, S Thomas, European Merger Control (CH Beck 2010) 89.
  • Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of the Community competition law [1997] OJ C 372/5.
  • Ch Bangard, D Möller, A Raimann, N Szadkowski, U Dubejko, Instrumenty ekonomiczne w prawie konkurencji (UOKiK 2007) 61.
  • Article 4 (9) Act on Competition and Consumer Protection of 16 February 2007, Journal of Laws 2007, no 50, item 331 (as amended).
  • Van Bael & Bellis, Competition Law of the European Community (Kluwer Law International 2005) 782-791.
  • Case 27/76 United Brands [1978] ECR I-207.
  • ABB/Daimler-Benz (Case IV/M.580) Commission Decision 97/25/EC [1997] OJ L11/1.
  • Nestlé/Perrier (Case IV/M.190) Commission Decision 92/553/EEC [1992] OJ L356/1, para 13.
  • Airtours/First Choice, (Case IV/M.1524) Commission Decision 2000/276/EC [2000] OJ L93/1 (it was annulled in the judgment ECJ Airtours v Commission [2002] ECR II-2585).
  • Case Airtours v Commission [2002] ECR II-2585, para 41.
  • UPM Kymmne/Haindl (Case M.2498) Commission Decision 2002/737/EC [2002] OJ L233/38, para 21. Nestlé/Perrier (Case IV/M.190) Commission Decision 92/553/EEC [1992] OJ L356/1, para 16.
  • Tetra Pack/Alfa Laval (Case IV/M.68) Commission Decision 91/535/EEC [1991] OJ L290/35 par 2.1.(v).
  • Du Point/ICI (Case IV/ M.214) Commission Decision 93/9/EEC [1993] OJ L7/13, para 28.
  • Danish Crown (Case IV/M.1313) Commission Decision 2000/42/EC [2000] OJ L20/1.
  • AOL/Time Warner (Case M.1845) Commission Decision 2001/718/EC [2001] OJ L268/28, paras 17-21.
  • Aérospariale-Alenia/de Havilland (Case IV/M.53) Commission Decision 91/619/EEC [1991] OJ L334/42, para 8.
  • Nestlé/Perrier (Case IV/M.190) Commission Decision 92/553/EEC [1992] OJ L356/1.
  • Guinness/Grand Metropolitan (Case IV/M.938) Commission Decision 98/602/EC [1998] OJ L288/24, para 10.
  • Telia/Telenor Case (IV/M.1439) Commission Decision 2001/98/EC [2001] OJ L40/1, para 94.
  • Hoffmann-LaRoche/Boehringer Mannheim (Case IV/M. 950) Commission Decision 98/526/EC [1998] OJ L234/14, para 11.
  • Case 6/72 Continental Can v Commission [1973] ECR I-32.
  • Rewe/Meinl (Case IV/M.1221) Commission Decision 1999/674/EC [1999] OJ L274/1.
  • Case 27/76 United Brands Company v Commission [1978] ECR I-207, para 44.
  • UPM-Kymmne/Haindl (Case M.2498) Commission Decision 2002/737/EC [2002] OJ L233/38, paras 25-30.
  • Price Waterhouse/Coopers&Lybrsand (Case IV/ M.1016) Commission Decision 1999/152/EC [1999] OJ L050/27, para 62.
  • Volvo/Scania (Case M.1672) Commission Decision 2001/403/EC [2001] OJ L143/74, paras 61-63.
  • Providence/ Carlyle/UPC Sweden (Case COMP/M.4217) Commission Decision [2006] OJ L144/15.
  • S Bishop, (Fore)closing the Gap: the Commission's Draft Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelined (2008) 1 "European Competition Law Review" 1.
  • A Heimler, Was the Change of the Test for Merger Control in Europe Justyfied? An Assessment (Four Years After the Introduction of SIEC) (2008) 4 "European Competition Journal" 85.
  • A Kaczorowska, European Union Law (Routledge 2011) 913-914.
  • A Jurkowska-Gomułka, T Skoczny, Wspólne reguły konkurencji Unii Europejskiej (Instytut Wydawniczy Euro Prawo 2010) 151-171.
  • R Wish, Competition Law (Oxford 2010) 849-871.
  • A Jones, EU Competition Law, Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford 2011) 915-941.
  • J Faul, A Nikpay, The EC Law of Competition (Oxford 2007) 479-495.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171328453

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.