PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | nr 43 | 53--73
Tytuł artykułu

CSR and Financial Performance: The Case of Polish Small and Medium Manufacturers

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper explores the hypothesized link between involvement in social responsibility and financial performance. In particular, it looks at this relationship among Polish small and medium manufacturing companies that operate in food, beverage and cosmetics industries. The statistical analysis involves developing and testing structural model on the basis of data from a survey of 187 managers supplemented by validated financial metrics from an external database. The outcomes suggests the existence of a weak but statistically significant positive correlation between the CSR involvement construct and sales profit margin (β=0.2). However, CSR seems to have no discernible direct effect on ROA. The study, as the first project of this kind in Poland, adds to the sparse body of literature on financial outcomes of CSR in small and medium enterprises from emerging economies. Another distinguishing feature of this research is its methodological approach which compares favorably to many previous studies in terms of robustness. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
53--73
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Institute of International Management and Marketing Warsaw School of Economics
Bibliografia
  • Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., Hatfield, J. (1985), An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 28, pp. 446-463.
  • Barnett, M., Salomon, R. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 1101-1122.
  • Bello, Z. (2005), Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification, Journal of Financial Research, 28, pp. 4-57.
  • Bowen, N., Guo, S. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Pocket Guides to Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Brammer, S. and Pavalin, S. (2006), Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 435-55.
  • Bush, T., Hoffmann, V. (2011), How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance, Business and Society, 50, pp. 233-265.
  • Byrne, B. (2010), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Second Edition, Routledge, New York.
  • Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., Waldman, D.A. (2007), The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance, Journal of Management Studies, 44, pp. 972-92.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1979), A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(1), pp. 497-505.
  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008), How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), pp. 1-13.
  • European Commission (2011), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, Belgium.
  • European Commission (2003), Responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium sized enterprises across Europe, Belgium, Bruxelles. retrieved on September 27, 2014 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF
  • European Commission (2005), Awareness-raising questionnaire, Belgium, Bruxelles, retrieved on June 3, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/campaign/documentation/download/questionaire_pl.pdf
  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press.
  • Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., McKeiver, C. (2008), An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, pp. 1-19.
  • Garson, D. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Statistical Association Publishing Blue Book Series, Statistical Association Publishing, Asheboro.
  • Groza, M.D., Pronschinske, M.R., Walker, M. (2011), Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR, Journal of Business Ethics, 102, pp. 639-652.
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. (2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
  • Hoyle, R.H. (2011), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  • Jenkins, H. (2009), A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium-sized enterprises, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), pp. 21-36.
  • Lu, W., Chau, K., Wang, H., Pan, W. (2014), A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011, Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, pp. 195-206.
  • Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006), Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value, Journal of Marketing, 70, pp. 1-18.
  • Malhotra, N. (2010), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Prentice Hall, 6th edition.
  • Martin, K., Thaghafian, H., Esapour, K., Amin, Alvari, M., Farhoodi, A. (2011), A study of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), pp. 668-674.
  • Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008), Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), pp. 404-424.
  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Wright, P. (2006), Guest editors' introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 1-18.
  • Mirońska, D., Zaborek, P. (2014), Polacy wobec marketingu społecznie zaangażowanego, Marketing i Rynek, 1/2014.
  • Mulaik, S. (2009), Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton.
  • Peloza, J. (2006), Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance, California Management Review, 48, pp. 52-72.
  • Peters, R., Mullen, M. (2009), Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance, The Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), pp. 1-14.
  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). 'Strategy and society'. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-91.
  • Rettab, B., Ben Brik, A., Mellahi, K. (2009), A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in emerging economies: the case of Dubai, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, pp. 371-390.
  • Tang, Z., Eirikur, H., Rotenberg, S. (2012), How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR - Financial Performance Relationship, Journal of Management Studies, 49, pp.1274-1303.
  • The Economist (2014), The glass-ceiling index: The best and worst places to be a working women, March 6th.
  • Torgusa, N., O'Donohue, W., Hecker, R. (2012), Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 109, pp. 483-500.
  • Wagner, M. (2009), Innovation and competitive advantages: from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms, Business, Strategy and the Environment, 18, pp. 291-306.
  • Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Whermeyer, W. (2002), The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, pp. 133-146.
  • Yu, V., Ting, H., Wu, Y. (2009), Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective, Management Decisions, 47, pp. 1065-1079.
  • Zaborek, P., Mirońska, D. (2013), Analiza wrażliwości polskich nabywców dóbr indywidualnych na działania z zakresu marketingu społecznego podejmowane przez wytwórców dóbr i usług konsumpcyjnych, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 288, pp. 115-125.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171360157

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.