Znaczenie ram instytucjonalnych dla efektywności regulacji rynków infrastrukturalnych

• Autorzy: Bożena Borkowska

Warianty tytułu

The Meaning of Institutional Structures for the Efficiency of Regulation of Infrastructure Markets

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W ekonomii występuje wiele koncepcji wyjaśniania efektów ekonomicznych państwowej regulacji rynków. Celem artykułu jest prezentacja koncepcji i wyników badań empirycznych zmierzających do wyjaśnienia wpływu otoczenia instytucjonalnego na efektywność regulacji rynków infrastrukturalnych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The economic literature presents a number of models that explain economic performance of regulation. The aim of this paper is presentation of theoretical and empirical research that explains how institutional environment affects the efficiency of regulation of infrastructure markets. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Efektywność; Rola państwa w gospodarce; Regulacyjna funkcja państwa

EN

Effectiveness; States' role in economy; Regulatory function of the state

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 3
• Numer: nr 74 Mikroekonomia i ekonomia instytucjonalna
• Strony: 329--345

Twórcy

autor

Bożena Borkowska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu

Bibliografia

• Banaszak B., Prawo konstytucyjne, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2008.
• Becker G.S., A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence, "Quarterly Journal of Economics" 1983, vol. 98, no. 3.
• Besley T., Case A., Does political accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits, "Quarterly Journal of Economics" 1995, vol. 110, no. 3.
• Crain W.M., Oakley L.K., The politics of infrastructure, "Journal of Law and Economics" 1995, vol. 38, no. 1.
• Dawson J.W., Institution, investment and growth: new cross-country and panel data evidence, "Economic Inquiry" 1999, vol. 36, no. 8.
• Duverger M., Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, John Wiley, New York 1954.
• Edwards G., Waverman L., The effects of public ownership and regulatory independence on regulatory outcomes, "Journal of Regulatory Economics" 2005, vol. 29, no. 1.
• Farnham P.G., The impact of citizen influence on local government expenditure, "Public Choice" 1990, vol. 64, no. 3.
• Goldberg V.P., Regulation and administered contracts, "Bell Journal of Economics" 1976, vol. 7, no. 2.
• Henisz W.J., Zelner B.A., Interest groups, political institutions and electricity investment, mimeo, 2001, vol. 10, no. 9.
• Henisz W.J., Zelner B.A., The institutional environment for telecommunications investment, "Journal of Economics and Management Strategy" 2001, vol. 10, no. 9.
• Henisz W.J., The institutional environment for infrastructure investment, "Industrial and Corporate Change" 2002, vol. 11, no. 2.
• Levy B., Spiller P.T., A framework for resolving the regulatory problem, [w:] U. Maki, B. Gustafsson, Ch. Knudsen (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London - New York 1993.
• Levy B., Spiller P.T., The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: a comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation, "Journal of Law, Economics and Organization" 1994, vol. 10, no. 2.
• Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, PWN, Warszawa 1992.
• North D.C., Institutions and economic perfomance, [w:] U. Mäki, B. Gustafsson, Ch. Knudsen (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London - New York 1993.
• Olson M., The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) 1965.
• Orłowski W., Skrzydło W., Ustrój polityczny Republiki Włoskiej, [w:] W. Skrzydło (red.), Ustroje państw współczesnych, UMCS, Lublin 2005.
• Persson T., Tabellini G., Constitutions and economic policy, "Journal of Economic Perspective" 2004, vol. 18, no. 1.
• Persson T., Tabellini G., Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 2000.
• Persson T., Tabellini G., Economic Effect of Constitutions, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 2003.
• Persson T., Tabellini G., Trebbi F., Electoral rules and corruption, "Journal of European Economic Association" 2003, vol. 1, no. 4.
• Spiller P.T., Tommasi M., The institutions of regulation. An application to public utilities, [w:] C. Menard, M.M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Dordrecht, Springer 2005.
• Spiller P.T., Vogelsang I., The United Kingdom: a pacesetter in regulatory incentives, [w:] B. Levy, P.T. Spiller (eds.), Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment. Comparative Studies of Telecommunications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
• Stigler G.J., The theory of economic regulation, "Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science" 1971, vol. 2.
• Tsebelis G., Decision-making in political systems: veto players in presidentalism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism, "British Journal of Political Science" 1995, vol. 25, no. 10.
• Tsebelis G., Veto players and law production in parlamentary democracies, "American Political Science Review" 1999, vol. 93, no. 5.
• Tullock G., The welfare coast of tariffs, monopolies and theft, "Western Economic Journal" 1967, vol. 5.
• Vogelsang I., Incentive regulation and competition in public utility markets: a 20-year perspective, "Journal of Regulatory Economics" 2002, vol. 22, no. 2.
• Williamson O., Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives, ,,Administrative Science Quarterly" 1991, vol. 36, no. 2.
• Williamson O.E., Franchise bidding for natural monopolies - in general and with respect to CATV, "Bell Journal of Economics" 1976, vol. 7, no. 1.
• Wittman D.A., The Myth of Democratic Failure. Why Political Institution are Efficient, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago - London 1995.