Analiza metodyk budowy ontologii zasobów internetowych

• Autorzy: Jarosław Wątróbski , Paweł Ziemba

Warianty tytułu

Analysis of Methodologies of Internet Resources Ontology Design

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule podjęto problem analizy metodyk projektowania ontologii zasobów internetowych. W tym celu na wstępie dokonano identyfikacji dostępnych metodyk budowy ontologii, takich jak: Cyc, metodyka Gruningera i Foxa, metodyka Usholda i Kinga, On-To- -Knowledge, Methontology, DILIGENT, HCOME, DOGMA oraz NeOn. Następnie przeprowadzono analizę ich przydatności dla potrzeb projektowania semantycznego opisu zasobów internetowych (zawartości np. stron WWW czy też portali społecznościowych). Rozważania pozwoliły na sformułowanie zbioru wytycznych zawierającego niezbędne elementy metodyki projektowania ontologii w wyżej wymienionym obszarze. Artykuł kończą wnioski, według których dla przedstawionego problemu budowy ontologii zasobów internetowych najlepszym rozwiązaniem wydaje się zastosowanie podejścia hybrydowego, które łączyłoby elementy poszczególnych metodyk.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The article discusses the problem of analysis of online resources ontology design methodologies. For this purpose, the available ontology design methodologies were identified: Cyc, Gruninger & Fox methodology, Ushold & King methodology, On-To- Knowledge, Methontology, DILIGENT, HCOME, DOGMA and NeOn. Then an analysis of their suitability for the design of semantic description of web resources was performed (eg. website content, social networking sites, etc.). Considerations allowed to formulate a set of guidelines containing the necessary elements of ontology design methodology in the above mentioned area. The article ends with conclusions, according to which the best solution for the present problem of ontology design seems to be the use of a hybrid approach which combines elements from different methodologies.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Ontologia; Sieć semantyczna

EN

Ontology; Semantic Web Service (SWS)

• Czasopismo: Informatyka Ekonomiczna / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 2 (36)
• Strony: 60--73

Twórcy

autor

Jarosław Wątróbski

• Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

autor

Paweł Ziemba

• Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim

Bibliografia

• Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lassila O., 2001, The Semantic Web. Scientific American, Web Ontology Language OWL Guide Version, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ (24.03.2015).
• Cardoso J., 2007, The Semantic Web Vision: Where Are We?, IEEE Inteligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, s. 84-88.
• Casellas N., 2011, Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Ontology Design, [w:] Casellas N. (red.), Legal Ontology Engineering. Methodologies, Modelling Trends, and the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge, Springer, s. 57-107.
• Corcho O., Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., 2006, Ontological Engineering: Principles, Methods, Tools and Languages, [w:] Calero C., Ruiz F., Piattini M. (red.), Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology, Springer, s. 1-48.
• Corcho O., Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., Lopez-Cima A., 2005, Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3369, s. 142-157.
• Davies J., Studer R., Warren P. (red.), 2006, Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, Wiley.
• Fensel D. (red.), 2003, Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• Fernandez-Lopez M., 1999, Overview Of Methodologies For Building Ontologies, Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods.
• Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., 2002, Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 17, no. 2, s. 129-156.
• Gomez-Perez A., Fernandez-Lopez M., Corcho O., 2004, Methodologies and Methods for Building Ontologies, [w:] Gomez-Perez A., Fernandez-Lopez M., Corcho O. (red.), Ontological Engineering, With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web, Springer, s. 107-197.
• Gruber T.S., 1993, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, s. 199-220.
• Gruninger M., Fox M.S., 1995, Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Inteligence IJCAI95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing.
• Hepp M., 2007, Ontologies: State of the Art, Business Potential, and Grand Challenges, [w:] Hepp M., Leenheer P., de Moor A., de Sure Y. (red.), Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, s. 3-22.
• Kotis K., Vouros G., 2006, Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME methodology, Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, s. 109-131.
• Kotis K., Vouros G., 2010, Ontological Tools: Requirements, Design Issues and Perspectives, [w:] Poli R., Healy M., Kameas A. (red.), Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, Springer, s. 155-173.
• Pinto H.S., Tempich C., Staab S., 2009, Ontology Engineering and Evolution in a Distributed World Using DILIGENT, [w:] Staab S., Studer R. (red.), Handbook On Ontologies. Second Edition. International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, s. 153-176.
• Rajpathak D., Chougule R., 2011, A generic ontology development framework for data integration and decision support in a distributed environment, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 24, no. 2, s. 154-170.
• Shahabi C., Chen Y.S., 2003, Web Information Personalization: Challenges and Approaches, [w:] Goos G., Hartmanis J., van Leeuwen J. (red.), Databases in Networked Information Systems Third International Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2822, Springer, s. 1-10.
• Smith B., 2003, Ontology, [w:] Floridi L. (red.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, Wiley- Blackwell, Oxford, s. 155-166.
• Spyns P., Tang Y., Meersman R., 2008, An ontology engineering methodology for DOGMA, Journal of Applied Ontology, vol. 3, no. 1-2, s. 13-39.
• Suarez-Figueroa M.C. (red.), 2010, NeOn Methodology for Building Ontology Networks: Specification, Scheduling and Reuse.
• Suarez-Figueroa M.C., Gomez-Perez A., Fernandez-Lopez M., 2012, The NeOn Methodology for Ontology Engineering, [w:] Suarez-Figueroa M.C., Gomez-Perez A., Motta E., Gangemi A. (red.), Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, Springer, s. 9-34.
• Sure Y., Staab S., Studer R., 2009, Ontology Engineering Methodology, [w:] Staab S., Studer R. (red.), Handbook On Ontologies. Second Edition. International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, s. 135-152.
• Sure Y., Tempich C., Vrandecic D., 2006, Ontology Engineering Methodologies, [w:] Davies J., Studer R., Warren P. (red.), Semantic Web Technologies. Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, Wiley, s. 171-190.
• Uschold M., Gruninger M., 1996, Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications, Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 11, no. 2, s. 93-155.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/ie.2015.2.05