Warianty tytułu
Corporate Social Responsibility in Practice, on the Basis of Activity within Global Compact
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Artykuł poświęcony jest aktywności w ramach inicjatywy Global Compact, jednego z narzędzi koncepcji społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Na początku zaprezentowane są niektóre istotne ujęcia teoretyczne CSR, następnie syntetyczna prezentacja inicjatyw CSR z głównym naciskiem na Global Compact. W kolejnej części autor dokonuje analizy aktywności w ramach tej inicjatywy korzystając z kompletnych, reprezentatywnych danych. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Article is devoted to activity in Global Compact initiative, one of the tools of corporate social responsibility conception of management. At the beginning some important theoretical approaches of CSR are presented, then there is a synthetic presentation of CSR initiatives with the main emphasis on Global Compact. In the next part of text the author analyzes the activities within this initiative using a complete, representative data. (original abstract)
Twórcy
autor
- Uniwersytet Warszawski
Bibliografia
- BSI (2003). The SIGMA Guidelines, Putting Sustainable Development Into Practice - A Guide For Organizations. London: British Standard Institution, SIGMA Project.
- Caux Round Table (2009). Principles for Responsible Business, Caux Round Table. http://www.cauxroundtable.org/index.cfm?&menuid=8 (29.12.2015).
- Cetindamar, D., Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of The United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163-176.
- Commission of The European Communities (2001). Green Paper, Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels: Commission of The European Communities.
- Coulmont, M. i Berthelot, S. (2015). The financial benefits of a firm's affiliation with the UN Global Compact. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 144-157.
- Eells, R. (1959). Social responsibility: Can business survive the challenge? Business Horizons, 2(4), 33-41.
- Eells, R. (1960). The Meaning of Modern Business. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (2012). Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition Code Of Conduct, Version 4.0. Washington: Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition. http://www.eicc.info/documents/EICCCodeofConductEnglish.pdf http://www.eiccoalition.org/media/docs/EICCCodeofConduct5_English.pdf (29.12.2015).
- Ethical Trading Initiative (2009). ETI Base Code appendices. London: Ethical Trading Initiative.
- Fair Labor Association (2011). FLA Workplace Code of Conduct and Compliance Benchmarks. Washington: Fair Labor Association.
- Foreign Trade Association (2007). BSCI System: Rules and Functioning. Brussels: Foreign Trade Association.
- International Council of Chemical Associations (2009). Responsible Care Status Report 2008. Brussels: International Council of Chemical Associations.
- International Hydropower Association (2011). Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol. London: International Hydropower Association.
- McKinsey (2006). https://hbr.org/2007/04/the-48th-annual-mckinsey-awards-recognizing-excellence-in-management-thinking (16.12.2015).
- OECD (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Pinkston, T.S. i Carroll, A.B. (1996). A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed?. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 199-206.
- Porter, M.E. i Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & Society, The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
- Porter, M.E. i Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
- Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a Model to Compare and Analyze Accountability Standards - The Case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4), 192-205.
- Rasche, A. i Waddock, S. (2014). Global Sustainability Governance and the UN Global Compact. A Rejoinder to Critics. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 209-216.
- Reed, A.M. i Reed, D. (2009). Partnership for Development: Four Models of Business Involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(SUPPL. 1), 3-37.
- Ruggie, J.G. (2001). global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Forum. Global Governance, 7(4), 371-378.
- Runhaar, H. i Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 479-495.
- Schlusberg, M.D. (1969). Corporate Legitimacy and Social Responsibility: The Role of Law. California Management Review, 12(1), 65-76.
- Schwartz, M.S. i Carroll, A.B. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three - Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.
- Sethi, S.P. i Schepers, D.H. (2014). United Nations Global Compact: The Promise-Performance Gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 193-208.
- UNGC (2012). After The Signature, A Guide to Engagement in the United Nations Global Compact. New York: UN Global Compact Office, United Nations.
- UNGC (2014). Guide to Corporate Sustainability, Shaping a Sustainable Future. New York: United Nations Global Compact.
- UNGC (2015). https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants (24.12.2015).
- Walton, C. (1967). Corporate Social Responsibilities. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
- Williams, O.F. (2014). The United Nations Global Compact: What Did It Promise?. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 241-251.
- Żemigała, M. (2013). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w świetle analiz bibliometrycznych i opinii pracowników na temat równowagi między życiem zawodowym a prywatnym, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171429746