PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 9 | nr 1 | 56--65
Tytuł artykułu

A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China and India in the XXI Century

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The protection of intellectual property still remains an important problem and a future challenge both for developed and developing countries. The international law has created many rules and recommendations connected with intellectual property protection. But even perfectly-created national legal system is worthless when the execution of law is inappropriate. The legal systems which are responsible for the protection of property rights in China and India are similar to systems implemented in Western economies and in the USA, however, there are some major differences. But the IPR protection in analyzed countries is perceived and evaluated negatively by all institutions and these countries are the main international sources of piracy and counterfeit goods. The article also tries to show and explain the differences in assessment of IPR protection in China and India and then lists and describes some of factors influencing the lack of appropriate protection of intellectual property rights in these countries in the twenty-first century. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
9
Numer
Strony
56--65
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Alfold W.P., (1998), Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization, Studies in East Asian law, Harvard University.
  • Auriol E., Biancini S., Paillacar R., Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Developing Countries, European Trade Study Group http://www.etsg.org (15.02.2015).
  • Australian Trade Commission., (2013a), Protecting intellectual property rights in China: an introductory guide, www.aus-trade.gov.au (2.02.2015).
  • Australian Trade Commission., (2013b), Protecting intellectual property rights in India: an introductory guide, www.aus-trade.gov.au (7.02.2015).
  • Chaudhry P. Zimmerman A., (2013), Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights, Management for Professionals, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
  • Chaudhry P. Zimmerman A., (2009), The Economics of Counterfeit Trade: Governments, Consumers, Pirates and Intellectual Propert Rights, Springer
  • Cheung G.C.K., (2011), Intellectual Property Rights in China: Politics of Piracy, Trade and Protection, Routledge Contemporary China Series.
  • Chandra R., (2012), Knowledge as Property: Issues in the Moral Grounding oof Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford India Paperbacks.
  • Dedigama A.C., (2009), 2009 Report. International Property Rights Index, Property Rights Alliance.
  • Devonshire-Ellis Ch., Scott A., (2011), Intellectual Property Rights in China, Springer, Hong Kong.
  • Ganea P, Garde T.V., (2009), Intellectual Property in Asia: Law, Economics, History and Politics, MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law.
  • Gwartney J,, Lawson R., Hall J., (2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010), Economic Freedom of the World: Annual Report, Fraser Institute.
  • Froman F., (2014), 2014 Special301 Report, Executive Office of the Resident of the United States.
  • Jilin X., (2000) The Fate Of An Enlightenment-Twenty Years in The Chinese Intellectual Sphere (1978-98). East Asian History, vol 20, pp.169-186.
  • Intellectual Property Office, (2013a), Intellectual property Rights in China, https://www.gov.uk (5.01.2015).
  • Intellectual Property Office, (2013b), Intellectual property Rights in India, https://www.gov.uk (10.01.2015).
  • Jackson K.A., (2011), 2011 Report. International Property Rights Index, Property Rights Alliance.
  • Lorenzo F., (2013), 2013 Report. International Property Rights Index, Property Rights Alliance.
  • Mertha A.C., (2007), The Politics of Piracy: Intellectual Property in Contemporary China, Cornell University Press
  • Miller T., Kim A.B., (2015) 2015 Index of Economic Freedom, Promoting Economic Opportunity and Prosperity, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T., Kim A.B., Holmes K.R. (2014) 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T., Holmes K.R., Feulner E.J. (2013), 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T., Holmes K.R., Feulner E.J. (2012), Highlights of the 2012 Index of Economic Freedom. Promoting Economic Opportunity and Prosperity. Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T., Holmes K.R., (2011), 2011 Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T ., Holmes K.R., (2010), Highlights of the 2010 Index of Economic Freedom. The Link Between Economic Opportunity and Prosperity, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Miller T., Holmes K.R., (2009), Highlights of the 2009 Index of Economic Freedom. The Link Between Economic Opportunity and Prosperity, Heritage Foundation, Washington.
  • Nishith Desai Associates., (2013), Intellectual property law in India, http://www.nishithdesai.com (10.02.2015).
  • OECD., (2005), Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China. OECD.
  • OECD., (2009), Magnitude Of Counterfeiting And Piracy Of Tangible Products: An Update, OECD
  • Office for the Harmonization of the Internal Market (2014), Guide to Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in India, https://oami.europa.eu (3.01.2015).
  • Property Rights Alliance, (2014), The International Property Rights Index 2014, http: http://internationalpropertyrightsin- dex.org (2.02.205)
  • Scaria A.G. (2014), Piracy in the Indian Film Industry: Copyright and Cultural Consonance, Cambridge University Press.
  • Ramasubramania J.V (2010), Evolution Of Intellectual Property Protection And Implications For India, www.altacit.com
  • Ragavan S., (2012), Patent and Trade Disparities in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press.
  • Tiwari G., (2012), 2012 Report. International Property Rights Index, Property Rights Alliance.
  • The Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, (2013) The IP Commission Report, The National Bureau of Asian Research.
  • United States International Trade Commission., (2010), China: Intellectual Property Infringement, Indigenous Innovation Policies, and Frameworks for Measuring the Effects on the U.S. Economy, Investigation No. 332-514USITC Publication 4199 (amended).
  • Yu P.K., (2012), Intellectual Property and Asian Values, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review vol. 329
  • Zhengzhi W., (2014), China Intellectual Property Task Force Members, http://www.wipo.int (14.02.1015).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171430314

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.