Regions and Regional Planning in Turkey

• Autorzy: Özer Karakayacı

Warianty tytułu

Regiony i planowanie regionalne w Turcji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Region is evaluated as a spatial unit which defines the economic-social structure and in which the planning processes like determining, implementing, managing and inspecting the regional development strategies and politics changing within the scope of paradigm changes are carried out. In Turkey, experience related to regional development politics goes back to the 1960s; it has been analysed to what extent regional planning and the concept of a region are affected by the changing processes which are experienced in economic and social structure, according to which criteria the borders for regional planning are determined and the role of these borders in the success of regional politics. According to the results, being unable to provide the interaction between regional planning and the meaning attributed to the concept of a region is the main factor in the non-occurrence of the success which has been aimed in regional development politics although regional planning and the concepts of a region are affected from the paradigm changes.(original abstract)

Region jest oceniany jako jednostka przestrzenna, która definiuje strukturę społeczno- -ekonomiczną i w której procesy planistyczne, takie jak: określanie, wdrażanie, zarządzanie i kontrola strategii rozwoju regionalnego i polityk, zmieniają się wraz ze zmianą paradygmatu rozwoju. W Turcji doświadczenia związane z prowadzeniem polityk rozwoju regionalnego sięgają lat 60. XX wieku. Analizowano wówczas, w jakim zakresie planowanie regionalne i koncepcja regionu są warunkowane przez procesy zmian zachodzące w strukturze społeczno-ekonomicznej i według jakich kryteriów wyznaczane są granice dla planowania regionalnego i rola tych granic w sukcesie polityk regionalnych. Rezultaty wskazują na niemożność zapewnienia interakcji pomiędzy planowaniem regionalnym i znaczeniem przypisywanym koncepcji regionu jako głównego czynnika niepojawienia się sukcesu określonego w politykach rozwoju regionalnego, pomimo że planowanie regionalne i koncepcja regionu warunkowane są paradygmatem zmian.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Regional planning; Region; Regional development

PL

Planowanie regionalne; Region; Rozwój regionalny

• Czasopismo: Biblioteka Regionalisty
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 15
• Strony: 33--45

Twórcy

autor

Özer Karakayacı

• Selcuk University, Turkey

Bibliografia

• Amin A., Thrift N., 1995, Globalisation 'institutional thickness' and the local economy, [in:] Healey P., Cameron S., Davoudi S., Graham S., Madanipour A. (eds.), Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 91-108.
• Beyhan B., 2008, On the Evaluation and Monitoring of Upper Scale Plans: the Necessity of Urban and Regional Observatories (in Turkish), 3rd Regional Dev. and Gov., 27-28 November 2008, Mersin, pp. 133-204.
• Coleman J. S., 1988, Social capital and the creation of human capital, Am. J. Sociology, vol. 94, pp. 95-121.
• Dulupçu M. A., 2006, Bölgesel Politikalar Kopyalanabilir mi? (in Turkish), Regional Dev. and Gov., 7-8 Sept. 2006, Ankara, 233-256.
• Eraydın A., 1997, Değişen Dünyada Bölge Planlamanın Yeniden Tanımlanması (in Turkish), 7th Reg. Sci. Cong., October 1997, Izmir.
• Fukuyama F., 1995, Trust, Free Press, New York.
• Gezici F., 1998, Effects of Tourism Activities in Sustainable Regional Development (in Turkish), ITÜ Unpublished PhD, Istanbul.
• Hadjimichalis C., 2006, Non-economic factors in economic geography and in 'new regionalism': A sympathetic critique, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 30, pp. 690-704.
• Haughton G., Counsell D., 2004, Regions and sustainable development: Regional planning matters, The Geographical Journal, vol. 170, pp. 135-145.
• Higano Y., Nijkamp P., Poot J., Wyk K., 2002, Trends and regional policies in the new economy, [in:] Higano Y., Nijkamp P., Poot J., Wyk K. (eds.), The Region in the New Economy: An International Perspective on Regional Dynamics, Ashgate, England.
• Isard W., 1975, Introduction to Regional Science, Prentice-Hall.
• Karakayacı Ö., 2015, Relational and institutional approaches to planning issues in Turkey, Megaron, vol. 10, pp. 580-594.
• Karasu K., 2009, Localization discourses and regional development agencies (in Turkish), Memleket: Siyaset-Yonetim, vol. 11, pp. 1-43.
• Keating M., 1997, The political economy of regionalism, [in:] Keating M., Loughlin J. (eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism, Frank Cass, London, pp. 17-40.
• Keating M., 1998, Is there a regional level of government in Europe?, [in:] Gales P., Lequesne C. (eds.), Regions in Europe, Routledge, London, pp. 8-21.
• Korenik S., Miszczak K., 2011, Region as a fundamental unit in modern spatial economy, GeoScape, vol. 6, pp. 11-17.
• Köroğlu T., 2012, Regional planning (in Turkish), [in:] Melih Ersoy (eds.), Urban Planning, Ninova Press, Istanbul.
• Mutlu S., 2008, A Critical Approach for Regional Planning Experiences in Turkey (in Turkish), 3rd Regional Dev. and Gov., 27-28 November 2008, Mersin, pp. 227-254.
• Özbek O., 2012, Normative regions and provincial development planning in Turkey (in Turkish), Journal of Amme İdaresi, vol. 45, pp. 129-154.
• Storper M., 1999, The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, [in:] Bryson J., Henry N., Keeble D., Martin R. (eds.) The Economic Geography Reader, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 209-115.
• Tekeli İ., 2008, Regional Inequality in Turkey and Regional Planning Essays (in Turkish), Tarih Vakfı Yurt Press, Istanbul. Wheeler S.M., 2002, The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement, Jour. of the American Plan. Assoc., vol. 68, pp. 267-278.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/br.2015.1.03