PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2016 | 11 | nr 3 | 631--650
Tytuł artykułu

Proactiveness, Competitive Aggressiveness and Autonomy : a Comparative Study form the Czech Republic

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this comparative study is to explore the differences in the entrepreneurial orientation (EO) between micro versus small and medium enterprises (SMEs). We have selected three dimensions of EO (proactiveness, competitive aggressiveness and autonomy) for our analysis. We have analyzed the data collected from 1141 respondents during the period of 2015 from 14 regions of the Czech Republic, which consists of 740 micro firms and 401 small and medium firms. Empirical results of our paper show significant differences between micro versus small and medium enterprises in terms of proactiveness and autonomy. However, we can only partially confirm that micro firms are statistically different from the SMEs in terms of competitive aggressiveness. Thus, our paper enables better understanding of the EO from the firm size perspective, when they have different levels of resources. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
11
Numer
Strony
631--650
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • Aldrich H.E., & Auster E.R. (1986). Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8.
  • Allen R., Helms M., Takeda M., & White C. (2006). A Comparison of Competitive Strategies in Japan and the United States. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71(1).
  • Anderson B.S., & Eshima Y. (2013). The Influence of Firm Age and Intangible Resources on the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Growth Among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.001.
  • Barney J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
  • Barringer B.R., & Bluedorn A.C. (1999). The Relationship Between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<421::AIDSMJ30>3.0.CO;2-O.
  • Beck T., Lu L., & Yang R. (2015). Finance and Growth for Microenterprises: Evidence from Rural China. World Development, 67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.008.
  • Bhuian S.N., Menguc B., & Bell S.J. (2005). Just Entrepreneurial Enough: the Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurship on the Relationship Between Market Orientation and Performance. Journal of Business Research, 58(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00074-2.
  • Blumentritt T., & Danis W. (2006). Business Strategy Types and Innovative Practices. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(2).
  • Clear F., & Dickson K. (2005). Teleworking Practice in Small and Medium-sized Firms: Management Style and Worker Autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00155.x.
  • Covin J.G., Slevin D.P., & Schultz L.R. (1994). Implementing Strategic Missions: Effective Strategic, Structural, and Tactic Choices. Journal of Management Studies, 31(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00627.x.
  • Covin J.G., & Slevin D.P. (1988). The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00033.x.
  • Covin J.G., & Wales G. (2011). The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x.
  • Dimitrator P., Lioukas S., & Carter S. (2002). The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and International Performance: the Importance of Domestic Environment. International Business Review, 13(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.08.001.
  • Ejdys J. (2016). Entrepreneurial Orientation vs. Innovativeness of Small and Medium Size Enterprises of Podlaskie Voivodship. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 6(1).
  • George G., Wood D.R. Jr, & Khan R. (2001). Networking Strategy of Boards: Implications for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985620110058115.
  • http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests.
  • http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ztest/Default2.aspx.
  • Hughes M., & Morgan R. (2007). Deconstructing the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage of firm Growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003.
  • Ireland R.D., Hitt M.A., & Sirmon D.G. (2003). A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and Its Dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00086-2.
  • Ismail V.Y. (2014). The Comparison of Entrepreneurial Competency in Woman Micro-, Small-, and Medium-scale Entrepreneurs. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115(2014). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.426.
  • Ivanova E., & Koisova E. (2014). Interregional Disparities in the Slovak and Czech Republic. Economic & Tourism. SGEM Conferencion Political Sciences Law, Finance. Volume IV. Sofia: STEF92 Technology, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B24/S7.052.
  • Jahur M.S., & Quadir S.M.N. (2012). Financial Distress In Small And Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of Bangladesh: Determinants and Remedial Measures. Economia Seria Management, 15(1).
  • Jelenc L., Pisapia J., & Ivanusic N. (2015). Demographic Variables Influencing Individual Entrepreneurial Orıentation and Strategic Thinking Capability. In: 10th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. Miami.
  • Kemelgor B.H. (2002). A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Entrepreneurial Orientation Between Selected Firms in The Netherlands and the USA. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985620110087023.
  • Kozubíková L., Belás J., Ključnikov A., & Virglerová Z. (2015). Differences in Approach to Selected Constructs of Entrepreneurial Orientation in SME Segment Regarding the Selected Socio-Demographic Factors. Transformations in Business and Economics, 14(3C-36C).
  • Kraus S. (2013). The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Service Firms: Empirical Evidence From Austria. Service Industries Journal, 33(5). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.622373.
  • Lechner C., & Gudmundsson V. S. (2014). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Strategy and Small Firm Performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242612455034.
  • Lumpkin G.T., & Dess G.G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1996.9602161568.
  • Lumpkin G.T., Cogliser C., & Schneider D. (2009). Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x.
  • Mahmood R., & Hanafi N. (2013). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance of Women-owned Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia: Competitive Advantage as a Mediator. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1).
  • Messersmith J.G., & Wales W.J., (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance in Young Firms: The Role of Human Resource Management. International Small Business Journal, 31(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242611416141.
  • Miller D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770.
  • Mintzberg H. (1973). Strategy-making in Three Modes. California Management Review, 16(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41164491.
  • Moreno A., & Casillas J. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growths of SMEs: A Causal Model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00238.x.
  • Moss T.V., Neubaum, D.O., & Meyskens M. (2015). The Effect of Virtuous and Entrepreneurial Orientations on Microfinance Lending and Repayment: A Signaling Theory Perspective. Entrepreneurshıp Theory and Practice, 39(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/etap.12110.
  • Munoz J.M., Welsh D.H.B., Chan S., & Raven P.V. (2015). Microenterprises in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study of the Factors for Management Success. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0302-y.
  • Pearce J.A. II, Fritz P., & Davis P.S. (2010). Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00315.x.
  • Pisoni A., Fratocchi L., & Onetti A. (2013). Subsidiary Autonomy in Transition Economies: Italian SMEs in Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal for East European Management Studies, 18(3).
  • Pett T.L., & Wolff J.A. (2011).SME Identity and Homogeneity- Are There Meaningful Differences Between, Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises?. International Council for Small Business, 6(2).
  • Rauch A., Wiklund J., Lumpkin G.T., & Frese F. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x.
  • Runyan R., Huddleston P., & Swinney J. (2006). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Social Capital as Small Firm Strategies: A Study of Gender Differences From a Resource-based View. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0010-3.
  • Salavou H., Baltas G., & Lioukas S. (2004). Organizational Innovation in SMEs: The Importance of Strategic Orientation and Competitive Structure. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560410548889.
  • Slater S.F., & Narver J.C. (2000). The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: a Balanced Replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00077-0.
  • Smékalová L., Hájek O., Belás J., & Macháček J. (2014). Perception of Small and Medium Entrepreneurship in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2014.04.03.
  • Thapa A. (2015). Determinants of Microenterprise Performance in Nepal. Small Business Economy, 45(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9654-0.
  • Thornhill S., & Amit R. (2003). Learning About Failure: Bankruptcy, Firm Age and the Resource-based View. Organization Science, 14(5). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.497.16761.
  • Welsh D.H.B., Munoz J.M., Deng S., & Raven P.V. (2013). Microenterprise Performance and Microenterprise Zones (MEZOs) in China. Management Decision, 51(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291292.
  • Wiklund J., & Shepard D. (2003). Knowledge-based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium Sized Businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.360.
  • Zahra S.A., & Neubaum D.O. (1998). Environmental Diversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of new Venture. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3(2).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171436554

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.