The Method of Creating Innovations in Enterprises through the Idea of Living Laboratories

• Autorzy: Anna Sabat
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Studies attempt the recognition of the occurrence Living Lab as a concept which supports innovations in enterprises. Research questions related to clarification how living labs create innovation in enterprises. The research object was living labs in the Ontario region. Developed case study will help with theorethical due to the early stage of development of the knowledge presented in the article. Equal partners of innovative processes were recognized, emphasizing the idea of prosumers and business iteractions in living labs. The article is based on research of living laboratories in Canada. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovations; Entrepreneurship; Enterprise innovation; Prosumer

PL

Innowacje; Przedsiębiorczość; Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw; Prosument

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: t. 16, z. 11, cz. 2 Zarządzanie - nowe perspektywy : heurystyczne podejście do innowacyjności
• Strony: 217--229

Twórcy

autor

Anna Sabat

• Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Bibliografia

• Almirall E., Lee M., Wareham J. (2012), Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies, "Technology Innovation Management Review", 2(9).
• Arnkil R., Järvensivu A., Koski P., Piirainen T. (2010), Exploring Quadruple Helix Outlining User-Oriented Innovation Models, "Työraportteja" 85/2010, Working Papers, University of Tampere.
• Bajgier S., Maragah H.D., Saccucci M.S., Verzilli A., Prybutok V.R. (1991), Introducing Students to Community Operations Research by Using a City Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory, "Operations Research", 39(5).
• Ballon P., Pierson J., Delaere S. (2005), Test and experimentation platforms for broadbandinnovation: Examining European practice, The 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society, Porto, Portugal, September 4-6.
• Ballon P., Glidden J., Kranas P., Menychtas A., Ruston S., Van der Graaf S. (2011), Is there a Need for a Cloud Platform for European Smart Cities?, [in:] P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (Eds), Proceedings of the eChallenges e-2011, Conference: 1-7. Dublin: International Information Management Corporation (IIMC).
• Bengtson P. (1994), Which Comes First, Internal Involvement or External?, "The Journal for Quality and Participation", 17(5).
• Lasher D.R., Ives B., Järvenpää S.L. (1991), USA-IBM Partnerships in Information Technology: Managing the Image Project, "MIS Quarterly", 15(4).
• Bergvall-Kåreborn B., Ihlström Eriksson C., Ståhlbröst A., Svensson J. (2009), A Milieu for Innovation: Defining Living Labs, [in:] K.R.E. Huizingh, S. Conn, M. Torkkeli, I. Bitran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery - The Role of Innovation Management, New York City, USA 6-9 December, 2009.
• Dell'Era C., Landoni P. (2014), Living Lab: A Methodology between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design, "Creativity and Innovation Management", 23(2).
• Chesbrough H. (2001), Open Innovation. The new Imperative for creating and profiting from technology, "Harvard Business School Press".
• Chesbrough H., Garman A., (December 2009), How Open Innovation Can Help You Cope in Lean Times, "Harvard Business Review".
• Czakon W. (red) (2011), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, Wolter Kluwer, Warszawa.
• Drucker P.F. (1998), On the Profession of Management, "Harvard Business School Press", Boston.
• Drucker P.F. (2006), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, "Paperback", United States.
• Dutilleul B., Birrer F.A.J., Mensink W. (2010), Unpacking European Living Labs: Analysing Innovation's Social Dimensions, "Central European Journal of Public Policy", 4(1).
• Edvardsson B. Kristensson P., Magnusson P., Sundström E. (2012), Customer Integration within Service Development - A Review of Methods and an Analysis of Insitu and Exsitu Contributions, "Technovation", 32(7-8).
• Edvinsson L., Malone M.S. (2001), Kapitał intelektualny, PWN, Warszawa.
• Eriksson M., Niitamo V.-P., Kulkki S., Hribernik K.A. (2006), Living Labs as a Multi-Contextual R&D Methodology, The 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, ICE 2006, Milan, Italy, June 26-28.
• European Commission Information Society and Media (2009), Unit F4 New Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities. Living Labs for user-driven open innovation. An overview of the Living Labs methodology, activities and achievements, January.
• EU's growth strategy: Europe 2020.
• Ferrari V., Mion L., Molinari R.F. (2011), Innovating ICT Innovation: Trentino as a Lab. In Proceedings of ICEGOV2011: 329- 332, Tallinn, Estonia, September 26-28.
• Følstad A. (2008), Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review, "Electronic Journal of Virtual Organisations (EJOV)", 10, Special Issue on Living Labs, Oslo, Norway.
• Hippel E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, London.
• Intille S.S., Larson K., Munguia Tapia E., Beaudin J., Kaushik P., Nawyn J., Rockinson R. (2006), Using a Live-In Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research, [in:] K.P. Fishkin, B. Schiele, P. Nixon, A. Quigley (Eds.), Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2006, LNCS 3968, pp. 349-365, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
• Joining Forces in a World of Open Innovation: Guidelines for Collaborative Research and Knowledge Transfer between Science and Industry, The Responsible Partnering version 1.1., 2009.
• Juujärvi S., Pesso K. (2013), Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland?, "Technology Innovation Management Review", 3(12).
• Klincewicz K. (2014), Tworzenie innowacji poprzez współpracę międzyorganizacyjną, [w:] A.K. Koźmiński, D. Latusek-Jurczak, Relacje międzyorganizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu, Warszawa.
• Leminen S. (2013), Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks, "Technology Innovation Management Review", 3(11).
• Leminen S., Westerlund M. (2012), Towards Innovation in Living Labs Network, "International Journal of Product Development", 17(1/2).
• Leminen S., Nyström A.-G., Westerlund M. (2015), A Typology of Creative Consumers in Living Labs, "Journal of Engineering and Technology Management".
• Lepik K.-L., Krigul M., Terk E. (2010), Introducing Living Lab's Method as Knowledge Transfer from One Socio-Institutional Context to Another: Evidence from Helsinki-Tallinn Cross-Border Region, "Journal of Universal Computer Science", 16(8).
• Leśniewski M. (2015), Konkurencyjność miękka przedsiębiorstw, Warszawa, Difin.
• Lievens B., Schaffers H., Turkama P., Ståhlbröst A., Ballon P. (2011), Cross Border Living Labs Networks to Support SMEs Accessing New Markets, [in] P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (Eds.), Proceedings of the eChallenges e-2011, Conference: 8. International Information Management Corporation (IIMC).
• Łobejko S. (2010), Innowacje otwarte źródłem konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstw, [w:] Nowacki R., Staniewski M., Podejście innowacyjne w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwem, Warszawa.
• Mirijamdotter A., Ståhlbröst A., Sällström A., Niitamo V-P., Kulkki S. (2006), TheEuropean Network of Living Labs for CWE - user-centric co-creation and innovation, E-Challenges, Barcelona, Spain, October 25-27.
• Molinari F. (2011), Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for the eGovernance of Innovation, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2011), pp. 131-140, September 26-28, 2011, Tallinn, Estonia.
• Mulder I., Stappers P.J. (2009), Co-Creating in Practice: Results and Challenges, Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Engineering (ICE 2009), Leiden, The Netherlands, 22-24 June.
• Niitamo V.-P., Kulkki S., Eriksson M., Hribernik K.A. (2006), State-of-the-Art and Good Practice in the Field of Living Labs, [in:] K.S. Thoben, P.M. Taisch, S. Terzi (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, pp. 349-357, Milan, Italy, Nottingham University Business School.
• Olesiński Z. (2010), Zarządzanie relacjami międzyorganizacyjnymi, C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
• Olesiński Z. (2014), Klastry i współpraca regionalna, [w:] A.K. Koźmiński, D. Latusek-Jurczak, Relacje międzyorganizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu, Warszawa.
• Oliveira A., Fradinho E., Caires R., Oliveira J., Barbosa A. (2006), Successful Regional Information Society Strategy to an Advanced Living Lab in Mobile Technologies and Services System Sciences, In HICSS '06: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 1-8.
• Pierson J., Lievens B. (2005), Configuring living labs for a 'thick' understanding of innovation, Conference proceedings of EPIC 2005 (Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference), Redmond, WA, November 14-15.
• Sabat A. (2013), Model efektywnego wykorzystania wiedzy dla wzrostu konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstw, [w:] Ekonomika i organizacja przedsiębiorstwa, Nr 10 (765), ORGMASZ.
• Schaffers H., Kulkki S. (2007), Living Labs: An Open Innovation Concept Fostering Rural Development, Tech Monitor, (Sep-Oct).
• Schaffers H., Turkama P. (2012), Living Labs for Cross-Border Systemic Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 25-30.
• Tang T., Hämäläinen M., Living Lab Methods and Tools for Fostering Everyday Life Innovation, [in] B. Katzy, T. Holzmann, K. Sailer, K.D. Thoben (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 18th International Conference on Engineering, "Technology and Innovation": 1-8.
• Schmid G. (2003), Beyond Conventional Service Economics, Berlin, Discussion Paper FS I.
• Schuurman D., De Marez L. (2009), User-Centred Innovation: Towards a Conceptual Integration of Lead Users and Living Labs, In Proceedings of COST298: The Good, the Bad and the Challenging, 13-15 May 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Strategia Rozwoju Kraju 2020.
• Veeckman C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. (2013), Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework, "Technology Innovation Management Review", 3(12).
• Veekam C. (2013), Characteristics and Their Outcomes in Living Labs: A Flemish-Finnish Case Study, Brussels.
• Veekam C. (2012), The impact of the organizational setup of Living Labs on the innovation process: a case study between different Living Lab approaches in Flanders, Brussels, Belgium.
• Veeckman C., Schuurman D., Leminen S., Westerlund M. (2013), Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework, "Technology Innovation Management Review", December.