Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objective: The objective of this paper is to present and evaluate selected variants of façade finishing technologies for one-storey commercial buildings. The economic analysis, a quantity take-off and cost estimate for threefaçades was conducted.
Research Design & Methods: The multi-criteria analysis was performed. The authors proposed five technical and economic criteria. Four methods of data encoding were used.
Findings: The best solution among the three variants of façades proposed is a masonry façade from clinker brick. This variant was also the cheapest one. The results obtained show that a multi-criteria analysis depends strongly on the weights of the criteria and also on the methods of data encoding.
Implications & Recommendations: The authors indicated the role of façades. The façade should become an integral part of the architectural form of the building and participate in a dialogue with the surrounding buildings. For this reason, the choice of a façade is important. Investors should consider different possible solutions taking into account various criteria.
Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in studying certain aspects of the investors' decision making process concerning building technologies. The paper is about façade finishing technologies and presents possible solutions. The choice of the best one should not be based only on the lowest cost. (original abstract)
Research Design & Methods: The multi-criteria analysis was performed. The authors proposed five technical and economic criteria. Four methods of data encoding were used.
Findings: The best solution among the three variants of façades proposed is a masonry façade from clinker brick. This variant was also the cheapest one. The results obtained show that a multi-criteria analysis depends strongly on the weights of the criteria and also on the methods of data encoding.
Implications & Recommendations: The authors indicated the role of façades. The façade should become an integral part of the architectural form of the building and participate in a dialogue with the surrounding buildings. For this reason, the choice of a façade is important. Investors should consider different possible solutions taking into account various criteria.
Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in studying certain aspects of the investors' decision making process concerning building technologies. The paper is about façade finishing technologies and presents possible solutions. The choice of the best one should not be based only on the lowest cost. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
67--79
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Cracow University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Cracow University of Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
- Antuchevičiene, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zakarevičius, A. (2010). Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 109-125.
- Bojęś, A. (2000). Aspekty architektoniczne kształtowania budynków użyteczności publicznej z lekkimi ścianami osłonowymi nowej generacji. Kraków: Politechnika Krakowska.
- Chow, T.T., He, W., & Ji, J. (2007). An experimental study of facade-integrated photovoltaic/waterheating system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27(1), 37-45.
- Crum, L. W. (1973). Analiza wartości. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
- Dodgson, J. S., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., & Phillips, L. D. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government: London.
- Gratia, E., & De Herde, A. (2007). The most efficient position of shading devices in a double-skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 364-373.
- Hien, W. N., Liping, W., Chandra, A. N., Pandey, A. R., & Xiaolin, W. (2005). Effects of double glazed facade on energy consumption, thermal comfort and condensation for a typical office building in Singapore. Energy and Buildings, 37(6), 563-572.
- Kibert, C. J. (2008). Sustainable construction: green building design anddelivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Komar, B., & Tymkiewicz, J. (2006). Elewacje budynków biurowych. Funkcja, forma, percepcja., Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
- Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2004). Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 26(6), 369-395.
- Perini, K., & Rosasco, P. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70, 110-121.
- Shameri, M. A., Alghoul, M. A., Sopian, K., Zain, M.F. M., & Elayeb, O. (2011). Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1468-1475.
- Schoch, O. (2006). My building is my display. In eCAADe Proceedings, 6, 610-616.
- Szwabowski, J., & Deszcz, J. (2001). Metody wielokryterialnej analizy porównawczej. Podstawy teoretyczne i przykłady zastosowań w budownictwie., Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
- Trzaskalik, T. (2014). Wielokryterialne wspomaganiedecyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, seria: Organizacja iZarządzanie, Z. 74, 2014, 239-263.
- Wiethoff, A., & Gehring, S. (2012). Designing interaction with media façades: a case study. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 308-317.
- Young, M.E., Urquhart, D.C.M., & Laing, R. A. (2003). Maintenance and repair issues for stone cleaned sandstone and granite building façades. Building and Environment, 38(9), 1125-1131.
- Zieba, M., Belniak, S., & Gluszak, M., (2013). Demand for sustainable office space in Poland: the results from a conjoint experiment in Krakow, Property Management, 31(5), 404-419.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171438104
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.