PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2016 | 4 | nr 3 | 41--51
Tytuł artykułu

The Tyrant-in-the-Mind: Influences on Worker Behaviour in a Post-Totalitarian Organization

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Tyran w umyśle: wpływ na zachowanie pracownicze w organizacji posttotalitarnej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper is an extended single case study exploring worker behaviour in a post-totalitarian organisation - a large secondary school. It uses theoretical contributions from political science exploring totalitarian regimes and from systems-psychodynamics, specifically ideas of narcissism and the concept of the-organisation-in-the-mind, as well as the concepts of role, task and boundary. It proposes that due to narcissistic needs, a tyrannical leader over-identified with his/her organisation to the extent that his/her own ego needs were merged with organisational needs. This was then taken in by the followers as their version of the organisation-in-the-mind, but with a specific addition: because the tyrant and the organisation are synonymous, they took in an organisational manifestation of the tyrant - the tyrant in the mind. This became the unconscious predicate shaping subsequent organisational behaviour, leading to increased conflict and ineffectiveness. Implications for leaders entering a post-totalitarian organisation and the nature of interventions are discussed, as are further lines of enquiry.(original abstract)
Artykuł przedstawia przypadek ilustrujący zachowania pracownicze w posttotalitarnej organizacji, jaką jest duża szkoła średnia. Czerpie z dorobku nauk politycznych badających reżimy totalitarne oraz z założeń podejścia systemowo-psychodynamicznego; odwołuje się do koncepcji narcyzmu oraz organizacji w umyśle, a także do takich pojęć, jak role, zadania i granice organizacyjne. Autor dowodzi, że lider-tyran, ze względu na swoje narcystyczne potrzeby, nadmiernie utożsamia się z organizacją, czyniąc to do takiego stopnia, że jego własne potrzeby zlewają się z potrzebami organizacji. Takie podejście przejmują podwładni, tworząc swoje wersje organizacji w umyśle, ze specyficznym jednak dodatkiem: ponieważ tyran i organizacja stały się synonimami, pracownicy tworzą manifestację organizacji jako tyrana w swoich własnych umysłach. Staje się to źródłem nieświadomych założeń, które kształtują zachowania organizacyjne, co w konsekwencji prowadzi do eskalacji konfliktów i spadku efektywności całej organizacji. W artykule omawiane są konsekwencje takiej sytuacji dla liderów wchodzących do posttotalitarnych organizacji oraz dyskutowane są możliwe działania interwencyjne.(abstrakt oryginalny)
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
4
Numer
Strony
41--51
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • The Human Givens Institute
Bibliografia
  • Arendt H., 1966, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Harcourt, Florida.
  • Armstrong D., 2005, Organization in the mind. Psychoanalysis, group relations and organisational consultancy, Occasional papers 1989- -2003, Karnac Books, London.
  • Armstrong D., Rustin M., 2015, Social Defences against Anxiety: Explorations in a Paradigm, Karnac, London.
  • Balser D., Carmin J., 2009, Leadership succession and the emergence of organisational identity threat, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(2).
  • Barker B., 2006, Rethinking leadership and change: a case study in the leadership succession is impact on school transformation, Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), pp. 277-293.
  • Bertalanffy L. von., 1969, General System Theory, George Braziller, New York.
  • Bion W.R. 1961, Experiences in Groups and Other Papers, Tavistock, London. Publications.
  • Bion W.R., 1962, A theory of thinking, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 53.
  • Bollas C., 1987, The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known, Free Association Books, London.
  • Civilization and its Discontents, Standard Edition 21, Hogarth Press, London.
  • Conquest R., 2000, Reflections on a Ravaged Century. New York: W.W.Norton & Co
  • Eloquin X., 2016, Systems-psychodynamics in schools: A framework for EPs undertaking organisational consultancy, Educational Psychology In Practice, published online 24.2.2016.
  • Fink D., 1999, The attrition of change: A study of change and continuity, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(3), pp. 269- -295.
  • Fraher A., 2004, A History of Group Study and Psychodynamic Organizations, Free Association Books, London.
  • Freud A., 1993, The Ego and the Mechanism of Defence, Karnac, London.
  • Freud S., 1920, An Introduction to Psychoanalysis, Bartleby.com, New York.
  • Freud Z., 1921, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Standard Edition, 18, pp. 67-143.
  • Freud S., 1930, Civilization and its Discontents, Standard Edition 21, Hogarth Press, London. Gilmore T.L., Krantz J., 1985, Projective identification in the consulting relationship: exploring the unconscious dimensions of a client system, Human Relations, 38(12), pp. 1159- -1177.
  • Gould L., Stapley L., Stein M., 2001, The Systems Psychodynamics of Organizations: Integrating the Group Relations Approach, Psychoanalytic and Open Systems Perspectives, Karnac, London.
  • Halton W., 1994, (30.04.2016), [in:] The unconscious at work. Individual and organisational stress in the human services, Obholzer A., Roberts V.Z. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Heller T., 1989, Conversion processes in leadership succession: A case study, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 25(1), pp. 65-77.
  • Hinshelwood R.D., 1994, Clinical Klein, Free Association, London.
  • Hinshelwood R.D., 2004, Suffering Insanity. Psychoanalytic Essays on Psychosis, Routledge, New York.
  • Hirschhorn L., 1988, The Workplace Within: Psychodynamics of Organizational Life, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/dictatorships-double- standards/ (31.4.2016).
  • Hutton J., Bazalgette J., Reed B., 1997, Organisation-in-the-Mind, [in:] Developing Organisational Consultancy Neumann J.E., Kellner K., Dawson-Shepherd A. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Jacques E., 1953, On the dynamics of the social structure. A contribution to the psychoanalytical study of social phenomena, Human Relations, 6(1), pp. 3-24.
  • Jacques E., 1955, Social Systems as a Defence against Persecutory and Depressive Anxiety, [in:] Klein M., Heimann P., Money-Kyrle R. (eds.), The New Directions in Psychoanalysis, Tavistock, London.
  • Kets de Vries M., 2006a, The Leader on the Couch: A Clinical Approach to Changing People And Organisations, Jossey Bass, Chichester.
  • Kets de Vries M., 2006b, The spirit of despotism: understanding the tyrant within, Human Relations, 59 (2), pp. 195-220.
  • Kirkpatrick J., 1979, Dictatorships and Double Standards, Commentary, Freud S., 1930,
  • Klein M., 1935, A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic depressive states, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16, pp. 145-174, reprinted [in:] Klein M., Love, Guilt and reparation and other works. 1921-1945, Hogarth Press, London, pp. 262-289, available full-text via PEP Archive.
  • Klein M., 1946, Notes on some schizoid mechanisms, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27(3-4), pp. 99-110, reprinted in: Envy and gratitude and other works, 1946-1963, Hogarth Press, London 1987.
  • Krantz J., 2006, Dilemmas of Organisational Change: A Systems Psychodynamic Perspective, [in:] The Systems Psychodynamics of Organisations, Gould L., Stapley S., Stein M. (eds.), Karnac, London.
  • Langer W.C., 1972, The mind of Adolf Hitler, Basic Books, New York.
  • Lawrence G.W., 2005, Totalitarian states of mind in institutions, http:// human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap148h.html.
  • Linz J., Stepan A., 1996, Problems of Democratic Consolidation, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • McFaul M., 2005, Transitions from post-communism, Journal of Democracy, 16(3), pp. 5-19.
  • McMahon A., 2001, Fair Furling Primary School, [in:] Success against the Odds - Five Years on, Maden M. (ed.), Routledge Falmer, London.
  • Menzies I.E.P., 1960, A case study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety. A report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital, Human Relations, 13 pp. 95-121, reprinted in: Containing anxiety in institutions. Selected essays. Vol. 1, Free Association Books, London, 1988.
  • Miller E., 1995, Dialogue with the client system: use of the "working note" in organisational consultancy, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6).
  • Obholzer A., 1994, Authority, Power and leadership: contributions from group relations training, [in:] The Unconscious at Work, Obholzer A., Roberts V. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Obholzer A., Miller S., 2004, Leadership, Followership and Facilitating the Creative Workplace, [in:] Working Below the Surface: The Emotional Life of Contemporary Organisations, Huffington A., Armstrong, D., Halton W., Hoyle L., Pooley, J. (eds.).
  • Peet M., 2012, Leadership transitions, tacit knowledge sharing and organisational generativity, Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), pp. 45-60.
  • Pipes S., 1995, Russia under the Bolshevik Regime, Vintage Books, Random House Inc, New York.
  • Popper K., 1971, The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 1, revised ed. (1945), Princeton University Press.
  • Rahmetov A., 2012, Authoritarian collapse: concepts, causes and knowledge accumulation, paper present at SISP Conference, http:// www.sisp.it/files/papers/2012/anvar-rahmetov-1448.pdf.
  • Rice A.K., 1953, Productivity and social organization in an Indian weaving shed: An examination of some aspects of the socio-technical system of an experimental automatic loom shed, Human Relations, 6, pp. 297-329.
  • Roberts V.Z, 1994, The Organization of Work: Contributions from Open- -Systems Theory, [in:] The Unconscious at Work. Individual and Organisational Stress in the Human Services. Obholzer A., Roberts V.Z. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Schwartz H., 1987, On the Psychodynamics of Organizational Totalitarianism, Journal of Management, 13(1), pp. 41-54.
  • Shorris E., 1981, The oppressed middle: politics of middle management/ scenes from corporate life, Garden City, Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York.
  • Sondrol P.C., 2009, Totalitarian and authoritarian dictators: a comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner, Journal of Latin American Studies, 23 (3), p. 599.
  • Stapley L.F., 2006, Individuals, Groups and Organizations Beneath the Surface, Karnac, London.
  • Stein H., 2007a, Organisational totalitarianism and the voices of dissent, Journal of Organisational Psychodynamics, 1(1), pp. 1-25.
  • Stein H., 2007b, The Inconsolable Organization, Toward a Theory of Organizational and Cultural Change, 12(4), pp. 349-368.
  • Stokes J., 1994, The Unconscious at Work in Groups and Teams, [in:] The Unconscious at Work. Individual and Organisational Stress in the Human Services, Obholzer A., Roberts V.Z. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Stokes J., 1994, Institutional chaos and personal stress, [in:] The Unconscious at Work. Individual and Organisational Stress in the Human Services, Obholzer A., Roberts V.Z. (eds.), Routledge, London.
  • Temple N., 2006, Totalitarianism - the internal world and the political mind, Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 20(2), pp. 105-114 (30.04.2016).
  • Waddell M., 1998, Inside Lives, Karnac, London.
  • Western S., 2008, Leadership: A Critical Text, Sage, London.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171443008

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.