PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | R. 14, nr 2, cz. 1 | 387--400
Tytuł artykułu

Uwarunkowania w osiąganiu sukcesu w zarządzaniu uczelnią wyższą w Polsce

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Achieving Success in the Management of Higher Education Institution in Poland
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Przedmiotem artykułu jest refleksja na temat znaczenia sukcesu w zarządzaniu przez uczelnie wyższe. Sukces w zarządzaniu uczelniami może być wyrażany przez takie kryteria, jak: osiągnięcia naukowe, wysoką jakość kształcenia, znaczący prestiż i rolę kulturotwórczą, komercjalizację badań oraz atrakcyjność kształcenia dla studentów i rynku pracy.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
The article is a reflection on the importance of success in the management of the universities. Success in the management of universities can be expressed by criteria such as scientific achievements, high quality education, a significant prestige and culture-making role, the commercialization of research and the attractiveness of education for students and the labor market.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
387--400
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński
  • Społeczna Akademia Nauk
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bogue E. G., Hall K. B. (2003), Quality and Accountability in Higher Education, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, London.
  • 2. Cave M., Kogan M., Hanney S. (1990), The Scope and Effects of Performance Measurement in British Higher Education, w: Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education: an International issue, Dochy F. J. R. C., Segers M. S. R., Wijnen W. H. F. W. (eds.), Van Gorcum and Comp, B.V., Assen/Maastricht.
  • 3. Chapleo Ch. (2005), Do universities have "successful" brands?, "International Journal of Educational Advancement", Vol. 6, No. 1.
  • 4. Cremonini L., Westerheijden D., Enders J. (2008), Disseminating the right information to the right audience: Cultural determinants in the use (and misuse) of rankings, "Higher Education", Vol. 55, No. 3.
  • 5. Cuenin S. (1987), The Case of Performance Indicators in Universities: An International Survey, "International Journal of Institutional Management", Vol. 11, No. 2.
  • 6. Damme van D. (2004), Standards and Indicators in Institutional and Programme Accreditation in Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework and a Proposal w: Indicators for Institutional and Programme Accreditation in Higher/Tertiary Education, L. Vläsceanu, L. C. Barrows (red.), UNESCO-CEPES, Bukareszt.
  • 7. Dochy F., Segers M. (1990), Selecting Indicators on the Basis of Essential Criteria and Appropriate Assessment Methods or a Quality Assurance System, Paper prepared for the CHEPS Conference, Quality Assessment in Higher Education at Utrecht.
  • 8. Dubnick M. (2012), Accountability as Cultural Keyword, University of New Hampshire, Prepared for a presentation at a seminar of the Research Colloquium 2on Good Governance, Netherlands Institute of Government, VU University, Amsterdam.
  • 9. Edwards D., Coates H. (2011), Monitoring the pathways and outcomes of people from disadvantaged backgrounds and graduate groups, "Higher Education Research & Development", Vol. 30, No. 2.
  • 10. Fielden J., Abercromby K. (2000), UNESCO Higher Education Indicators Study: Accountability and International Cooperation in the Renewal of Higher Education, UNESCO, Paryż.
  • 11. Kaymaz K., Eryigit K. Y. (2011), Determining factors hindering university-industry collaboration: an analysis from the perspective of academicians in the context of entrepreneurial science paradigm, "International Journal of Social Inquiry", Vol. 4, No. 1.
  • 12. Kohengkul S., Wongwanich S., Wiratchai N. (2009), Influences of strategies, knowledge sharing and knowledge transfer on the success of university-school collaboration in research and development, "Research in Higher Education Journal", Vol. 5.
  • 13. Minelli E., Rebora G., Turri M. (2005), University and evaluation: a case study of the organizational impact, Libero Istituto Universitario Carlo Cattaneo.
  • 14. Rodman K., Biloslavo R., Bratoz S. (2013), Institutional quality of a higher education institution from the perspective of employers, "Minerva", Vol. 51, No. 1.
  • 15. Salvador E., Benghozi P-J. (2005), Research spin-off firms: does the university involvement really matter?, "Management international/International Management/Gestion Internacional", Vol. 19, No. 2.
  • 16. Spee A., Bormans R. (1992), Performance Indicators in Government-Institutional Relations: The Conceptual Framework, "Higher Education Management", Vol. 42.
  • 17. Sułkowski Ł. (2016), Kultura akademicka - koniec utopii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • 18. Trott P., Scholten V. E., Hartmann D. (2008), How university incubators may be overprotective and hindering the success of the young firm: Findings from a preliminary study, Engineering Management Conference, IEMC Europe 2008, IEEE International.
  • 19. Vermeulen L., Schmidt H. G. (2008), Learning environment, learning process, academic outcomes and career success of university graduates, "Studies in Higher Education", Vol. 33, No. 4.
  • 20. Vläsceanu L., Grünberg L., Pärlea D. (2004), Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions, Unesco-Cepes, Bukareszt.
  • 21. Wedlin L. (2008), University marketization: The process and its limits, "The University in the Market", Vol. 84.
  • 22. Wood M. S. (2011), A process model of academic entrepreneurship, "Business Horizons", Vol. 54, No. 2.
  • 23. www.linguee.com/english-polish/translation/accountability.html, dostęp dnia 19.12.2015.
  • 24. Xu W. (2013), Worldwide university ranking and its underlying basis: a perspective of university orientation towards excellence, University of Iceland, Reykjavik.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171443628

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.