Organizational Culture and Firms' Internationalization, Innovativeness and Networking Behaviour : Hofstede Approach

• Autorzy: Maja Szymura-Tyc , Michał Kucia
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the features of firms' organizational culture within four of Hofstede's national culture dimensions and their potential relationships with internationalization, innovativeness and networking behaviour of firms.

Research Design & Methods: This explorative quantitative research refers to results of an earlier study on internationalization, innovativeness and networking of firms in Poland. Descriptive statistics are used to depict the features of the organizational culture of the firms differing in behaviour in the three fields.

Findings: The study leads to two hypotheses. First is that higher power distance is conducive for firms' internationalization and innovativeness. The second is that the lower uncertainty avoidance supports internationalization, innovativeness and networking behaviour of firms.

Implications & Recommendations: An attempt to create more consistent measures of organizational culture dimensions should be made in future analyses. This could help to achieve more sound results on the relationships between organizational culture and firms' behaviour in internationalization, innovativeness and networking.

Contribution & Value Added: The paper gives an insight into the organizational culture features relationships with a broad area of firms' behaviour related with their ability to gain competitive advantage. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management process; Organisational culture; Enterprise internationalization

PL

Proces zarządzania; Kultura organizacyjna; Internacjonalizacja przedsiębiorstw

• Czasopismo: Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 4 Entrepreneurship in the Global Context
• Strony: 67--92

Twórcy

autor

Maja Szymura-Tyc

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

autor

Michał Kucia

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

• Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 209-231.
• Basile, R. (2001). Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation. Research Policy, 30(8), 1185-1201.
• Becker, S.O., & Egger, P.H. (2013). Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm's propensity to export. Empirical Economics, 44(1), 329-354.
• Bell, J. (1995). The internationalization of small computer software firms: A further challenge to "stage" theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29(8), 60-75.
• Blomstermo, A., Eriksson, K., Lindstrand, A., & Sharma, D.D. (2004). The perceived usefulness of network experiential knowledge in the internationalizing firm. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 355-373.
• Boski, P. (2009). Kulturowe ramy zachowań społecznych. Podręcznik psychologii międzykulturowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
• Coviello, N.E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713-731.
• Coviello, N.E., & Munro, H.J. (1995). Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for internation-al market development. European Journal of Marketing, 29(7), 49-61.
• Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
• Eriksson, K., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D.D. (2000). Path dependence and knowledge development in the internationalization process. Management International Review, 40(4), 307-328.
• Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3), 257-277.
• Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
• Hayton, J.C., George, G., & Zahra, S. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 26(4), 33.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: international differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Hofstede, G. (1995). Multilevel Research of Human Systems: Flower, Bouquets and Gardens. Human Systems Management, 14, 207-217
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Or-ganizations across Nations. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
• Hofstede, G., Hostede, G., & Minkov, M. (2011). Kultury i organizacje. Zaprogramowanie umysłu. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
• Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.G. (1988). Internationalisation in Industrial Systems - a Network Approach. In N. Hood & J.E. Vahlne (Eds.), Strategies in Global Competition (pp. 303-321). New York: Croom Helm.
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431.
• Jones, G.K., & Teegen, H.J. (2001). Global R&D activity of US MNCs: does national culture affect investment decisions? Multinational Business Review, 9(2), 1.
• Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B., & Gibson, C.B. (2006). A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320.
• Kohonen, T. (1990). The Self-Organizing Map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78, 1464-1480.
• Kosała, M. (2015). Innovation Processes as Stimulant of Internationalisation Process of Firms. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(2), 65-84.
• Lewandowska, M., Szymura-Tyc, M., & Gołębiowski, T. (2016), Innovation complementarity, coop-eration partner, and new product export: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3673-3681.
• Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D.D. (1998). Client-following and market-seeking strategies in the internationalization of service firms. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 4(3), 1-41.
• Manev, I.M., & Stevenson, W.B. (2001). Nationality, cultural distance, and expatriate status: Ef-fects on the managerial network in a multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 285-303.
• McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith-a failure of analysis. Human relations, 55(1), 89-118.
• Morris, M.H., Davis, D.L., & Allen, J.W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1) 65-89.
• Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
• Roper, S., & Love, J.H. (2002). Innovation and export performance: Evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Research Policy, 31(7), 1087-1102.
• Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), 221-240.
• Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: new insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460.
• Salomon, R.M., & Jin, B. (2008). Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1), 132-150.
• Shane, S. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (1), 47-68.
• Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. (1995). Cultural differences in innovation champion-ing strategies. Journal of Management, 21(5), 931-952.
• Sharma, D.D., & Blomstermo, A. (2003). The internationalization process of born globals: a net-work view. International Business Review, 12(6), 739-753.
• Smith, P.B. (2002). Culture's consequences: Something old and something new. Human Relations, 55(1), 119-135.
• Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Kulturowe procesy zarządzania. Warszawa: Difin.
• Szymura-Tyc, M., & Łapczyński, M. (2012). Internationalisation and Innovation in Networks. In R. Springer & P. Chadraba (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Marketing and Business Strategies for Central & Eastern Europe (pp. 287-301). Vienna: Vienna University of Economics and Business.
• Szymura-Tyc, M. (2015a). Innovativeness and Internationalisation of the Polish Economy - the Transition Process Perspective. Journal of Economics and Management, 21(3), 5-20.
• Szymura-Tyc, M. (2015b). Internacjonalizacja, innowacyjność i usieciowienie przedsiębiorstw. Podejście holistyczne. Warszawa: Difin.
• Thomas, A.S., & Mueller, S.L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
• Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. Chicago IL: Irwin.
• Zaheer, S., & Zaheer, A. (1997). Country effects on information seeking in global electronic net-works. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 77-100.
• Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R.D., & Hitt, M.A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: Inter-national diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/EBER.2016.040405