PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 14 | 9--22
Tytuł artykułu

Epistemological Dilemmas in Management Research

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Building knowledge about management processes depends on several aspects which are necessary to be taken into consideration during any research in that field. In the paper such theoretical dilemmas of creating knowledge about activities in management area can be found: specification of borders of scientific cognition, the perspectives of questions and expected answers, the differences between quality and quantity approaches, a choice of a research method, the possibilities of the verification of the hypotheses, conducting inference and the borders of an explanation in management science. (original abstract)
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Abowitz, D.A., & Toole, T.M. (2010). Mixed method research: fundamental issues of design, validity and reliability in construction research. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 128(3), 203-210.
  • Adam, M. (2007). Two notions of scientific justification. Synthese, 158, 93-108.
  • Azorin, J. M., & Cameron, R. (2010). The application of mixed methods in organizational research: a literature review. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 95-105.
  • Bartunek, J.M., Bobko, P., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Toward innovation and diversity in management research methods. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1362-1373.
  • Bendixen, L.D. & Rule, D.C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: a guiding model. Education Psychologist, 39(1), 69-80.
  • Blackler, F.H.M. & Brown, C.A. (1983). Qualitative research and paradigms of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 349-365.
  • Bocheński, J.M. (1993). Współczesne metody myślenia. Poznań: Wydawnictwo W drodze.
  • Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159-168.
  • Cassell, C. & Symon G. (2006). Taking qualitative methods in organization and management research seriously. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1(1), 4-12.
  • Cassell, C., Buehring, A., Symon, G. & Johnson, P. (2006). Qualitative methods in management research: an introduction to the themed issue. Management Decision, 44(2), 161-166.
  • Creath, R. (1998). Quine and the limit assumption in Peirce's theory of truth. Philosophical Studies, 90, 109-112.
  • Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Czakon, W. (2006). Łabędzie Poppera - case study w badaniach nauk o zarządzaniu. Przegląd Organizacji, 9, 6-10.
  • Czakon, W. (2010). Zasobowa teoria firmy w krzywym zwierciadle. Przegląd organizacji, 4, 8-12.
  • Day, R.E (2005). Clearing up "implicit knowledge": implications for knowledge management, information science, psychology, and social epistemology. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, 56(6), pp. 630-635.
  • Deutsch, D. (2007). Struktura rzeczywistości. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
  • Dilley, P. (2004). Interviews and the philosophy of qualitative research. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 122-130.
  • Dolby, R.G.A. (1998). Niepewność wiedzy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Amber Sp. z o.o.
  • Edmondson, A.C & Mcmanus, S.A. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179.
  • El-Diraby, T. E. (2012). Epistemology of construction informatics. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 138(1), 53-65.
  • Faber, J. & Scheper, W.J. (2003). Social scientific explanations? Quality & Quantity, 37, 135-150.
  • Fawcett, B. & Hearn, J. (2004). Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(3), 201-218.
  • Krogh, G., Roos, J. & Slocum, K. (1994). An essay on corporate epistemology. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 53-71.
  • Gordon, W. (2011). Behavioural economics and qualitative research - a marriage made in heaven? International Journal of Market Research, 53(2), 1-16.
  • Gottfried, G. (2007). Teoria poznania. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
  • Greene, J., Caracelli, V. & Graham W. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
  • Grzybek, S. (2006). Prawa metodyki w sensie ogólnym i praktycznym. Przegląd Organizacji, 11, 22-26.
  • Hassell, L. (2007). A continental philosophy perspective on knowledge management. Information Systems Journal, 17, 185-195.
  • Heller, M., & Życiński, J. (2011). Pasja wiedzy. Kraków: Petrus.
  • Hofer, B.K. (2005). The legacy and the challenges: Paul Pintrich's contributions to personal epistemology research. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 95-105.
  • Husserl, E. (2008). Idea fenomenologii. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Ingarden, R. (1971). U podstaw teorii poznania. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Keller, A. (2010). Wprowadzenie do teorii poznania. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
  • Koźmiński, A.K., & Latusek-Jurczak, D. (2011). Rozwój teorii organizacji. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Krzyżanowski, L. (1992). Podstawy nauk o organizacji i zarządzaniu. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Lee, B. & Catherine, C. (2013). Research methods and research practice: history, themes and topics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 123-131.
  • Lee, J. (1992). Quantitative versus qualitative research methods - two approaches to organisation studies. Asia Pacific Journal Of Management, 9(1), 87-94
  • Malina, M.A., Nørreklit, H.S.O. & Selto, F.H. (2011). Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qualitative Research in Accounting &Management, 8(1), 59-71.
  • Marsden, A. (2012). Ontology, epistemology, and some research proposals. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 6(2), 161-167.
  • McGuire, J.B. (1986). Management and research methodology. Journal of Management, 12(1), 5-17.
  • Midgley G.(2003). Science as systemic intervention: some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(2), 77-97.
  • Midgley, G. (2011). Theoretical pluralism in systemic action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(3), 1-15.
  • Mkansi, M. & Acheampong, A.E. (2012). Research philosophy debates and classifications: students' dilemma. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(2), 132-140.
  • Molina-Azorin, J.F., Lopez-Gamero, M.D., Pereira-Moliner, J. & Pertusa-Ortega, E.M. (2012). Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: applications and contributions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(5-6), 425-456.
  • Nodoushani, O. (2000). Epistemological foundations of management theory and research methodology. Human Systems Management, 19, 71-80.
  • Nowaczyk, A. (2008). Filozofia analityczna. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Onfray, M. (2010). Antypodręcznik filozofii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca.
  • Parsons, T. (1968). Social interaction. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 7, 429-441.
  • Pinsonneault, A. & Kraemer, K.L. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems - an assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 75-105.
  • Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Oxford: Routledge Classics.
  • Przybyłowski J. (2002). Logika formalna z ogólną metodologią nauk. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  • Symonds, J.E. & Gorard, S. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation & Research in Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 121-136.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Valone, J. J. (1988). Against epistemology: A constructive look at Adorno's Deconstruction. Human Studies, 11(1), 87-97.
  • Voordijk, H. (2009). Construction management and economics: the epistemology of a multidisciplinary design science. Construction Management and Economics, 27, 713-720.
  • White, L. & Taket, A. (1996). The end of theory? International Journal of Management Science, 24(1), 47-56.
  • Wieczorek, K. (2005). Wprowadzenie do logiki. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Woleński, J. (2000), Epistemologia. T. I. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Ureus,.
  • Woźniak, K. (2010). Problem pomiaru w naukach organizacji i zarządzania. Przegląd Organizacji, 4, 7-11.
  • Zachariadis, M., Scott, S. & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855-879.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171455363

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.