Social Market Economy - a Contemporary Institutional Framework

• Autorzy: Helena Helfer

Warianty tytułu

Soziale Marktwirtschaft - Ein zeitgenössisches institutionenbasiertes Modell

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present study highlights the need for research on and the reform of the topic of Social Market Economy (SME). Even though this socio-economic order lifted Germany onto a path of, until then, unknown prosperity after WWII, surveys show that a considerable part of Germany's population does not rally behind this concept anymore. The study uses an institution-based approach to propose a contemporary framework of the SME. Relevant literature is analyzed to identify those institutions that on one hand fall in line with Walter Eucken's classic principles and, on the other hand, that have empirically proven to be prosperity enhancing, since prosperity is assumed to be one of the primary objectives of the SME. The resulting framework of institutions will most likely not serve as a blueprint when establishing an economic order, but can be used as a benchmark of a contemporary SME in theoretical and empirical analyses.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social market economy; Small business

PL

Społeczna gospodarka rynkowa (SGR); Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 68 nr 3 Społeczne aspekty działalności gospodarczej
• Strony: 81--100

Twórcy

autor

Helena Helfer

• Universität Münster

Bibliografia

• Aidt T.S., 2009, Corruption, institutions, and economic development, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 25, No. 2: 271-291.
• Alchian A., 1965, Some economics of property rights, Il Politico, Vol. 30, No. 4: 816-829.
• Alchian A., Demsetz H., 1973, The property rights paradigm, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 33, No. 1: 16-27.
• Alesina A., Özler S., Roubini N., Swagel P., 1992, Political Instability and Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 4173.
• Alesina A., Summers L.S., 1993, Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 25, No. 2: 151- 162.
• Allensbach = Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, 2010, Einstellungen zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft in Deutschland am Jahresanfang 2010. Ergebnisse aus repräsentativen Trendfortschreibungen, Studie im Auftrag der Heinz Nixdorf Stiftung und der Bertelsmann Stiftung.
• Andvig J.C., Moene K.O., 1990, How Corruption May Corrupt, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 13, No. 1: 63-76.
• Bankenverband 2010 = Bundesverband deutscher Banken, 2010, Schönhauser Gespräche 2010. Führen - Verantwortung - Vertrauen. Ergebnisse repräsentativer Meinungsumfragen im Auftrag des Bundesverbands deutscher Banken, November 2010.
• Bankenverband 2013 = Bundesverband deutscher Banken, 2013, Wirtschaftsstandort Deutschland, Ergebnisse repräsentativer Meinungsumfragen im Auftrag des Bankenverbandes, Pressegespräch am 3. Juli 2013.
• Asoni A., 2008, Protection of property rights and growth as political equilibrium, The Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 22, No. 5: 953-987.
• Barro R.J., 1989, Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 3120.
• Barro R.J., 1999, Human capital and growth in cross-country regressions, Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 6, No. 2: 237-276.
• Beck T., Levine R., Loyaza N., 2000, Finance and the sources of growth, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58: 261-300.
• Bentzen J.S., 2012, How Bad is Corruption? Cross-country Evidence of the Impact of Corruption on Economic Prosperity, review of Development Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1: 167-184.
• Berger H., de Haan J., Eijffinger S.C.W., 2000, Central Bank Independence: an Update on Theory and Evidence, CESifo Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 255.
• Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2011, Zukunft Soziale Marktwirtschaft. infas Umfrage, April 2011.
• Bloom D., Canning S., Sevilla J., 2004, The Effect of Health on Economic Growth: A Production Function Approach, World Development, Vol. 32, No. 1: 1-13.
• Brunetti A., Weder B., 2003, A free press is bad news for corruption, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 87, No. 7-8: 1801-1824.
• Coase R.H., 1960, The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 3: 1-44.
• De la Fuente A., 1997, Fiscal policy and growth in the OECD, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 1755.
• Demsetz H., 1967, Toward a theory of property rights, American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 2: 347-359.
• De Vaal A., Ebben W., 2011, Institutions and the Relation between Corruption and Economic Growth, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1: 108-123.
• Easterly W., Rebelo S., 1993, Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 32: 417-458.
• Ebert U., Welsch H., 2004, Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 47, No. 2: 270-283.
• Égert B., 2013, Public Debt, Economic Growth and Nonlinear Effects: Myth or Reality, CESifo Working Paper: Fiscal Policy, Macroeconomics and Growth, No. 4157.
• Engen E.M., Skinner J., 1992, Fiscal policy and economic growth, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 4223.
• Eucken W., 1952/1990, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
• Fölster S., Henrekson M., 2001, Growth Effects of Government Expenditure and Taxation in Rich Countries, European Economic Review, Vol. 45: 1501-1520.
• Furubotn E., Pejovich S., 1972, Property rights and economic theory: A survey of recent literature, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10, No. 4: 1137-1162.
• Goldschmidt N., Wohlgemuth M., 2008, Social Market Economy: origins, meanings and interpretations, Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 19: 261-276.
• Grier K.B., 1997, Governments, unions and economic growth, in: V. Bergstrom (ed.), Government and Growth, Oxford: Clarendon.
• Haggard S., MacIntyre A., Tiede L., 2008, The Rule of Law and Economic Development, Annual Reviews of Political Science, Vol. 11: 205-234.
• Hansson P., Henrekson M., 1994, A new framework for testing the effect of government spending on growth and productivity, Public Choice, Vol. 81: 381-401.
• Hayo B., Hefeker C., 2002, Reconsidering central bank independence, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 18: 653-674.
• Herndon T., Ash M., Pollin R., 2014, Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 38: 257-279.
• Huntington, S. P. (1968): Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, CT: Simon and Schuster. IMF = International Monetary Fund, 2011, Germany 2011: Article IV Consultation - Staff Report.
• IMF Country Report No. 11/168, July 2011.
• Infratest dimap, 2012, ARD DeutschlandTREND Februar 2012. Umfrage zur politischen Stimmung im Auftrag der ARD-Tagesthemen und drei Tageszeitungen, Berlin, www.infratest-dimap.de/ fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/dt1202_bericht.pdf.
• Keefer P., Knack S., 2002, Polarization, Politics and Property Rights: Links between Inequality and Growth, Public Choice, Vol. 111, No. 1/2: 127-154.
• Kumar M.S., Woo J., 2010, Public Debt and Growth, IMF Working Paper, WP/10/174.
• Leff N.H., 1964, Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 8: 8-14.
• Li H., Huang L., 2009, Health, education, and economic growth in China: Empirical findings and implications, China Economic Review, Vol. 20: 374-387.
• Lindvall J., 2006, The Politics of Purpose: Swedens Economic Policy after the Golden Age, Comparative Politics, Vol. 38, No. 3: 253-272.
• Lindvall J., Rothstein B., 2006, Sweden: The Fall of the Strong State, Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1: 47-63.
• Mahoney P.G., 2001, The Common Law and Economic Growth: Hayek Might Be Right, The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 30, No. 2: 503-525.
• Malhotra A., Schuler S.R., 2005, Women's Empowerment as a Variable in International Development, in: D. Narayan (ed.), Measuring Empowerment. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Washington.
• Mauro, P., 2004, The Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 51, No. 1: 1-18.
• Mertins V., 2013, Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Auslauf- oder Zukunftsmodell?, List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, Vol. 39, Iss. 2: 137-162.
• Müller-Armack A., 1947/1967, Wirtschaftslenkung und Marktwirtschaft, in: H.W. Doeblin (ed.), Der Wirtschaftsspiegel, Wirtschaftspolitische Halbmonatszeitschrift, December 1947, printed in: Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik im Zeichen der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, Festgabe für Frank Etzel, Stuttgart: Degerloch, 19-170.
• North D.C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• OECD, 2014, Economic Outlook No. 95, May 2014 - OECD Annual Projections.
• Osterhammel J., 2009, Die Verwandlung der Welt. Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, München.
• Plümper T., Martin C., 2003, Democracy, government spending, and economic growth: A politicaleconomic explanation of the Barro-effect, Public Choice, Vol. 117: 27-50.
• Reichstagsprotokolle, 1882, Stenographische Berichte über die Verhandlungen des Reichstages. V. Legislaturperiode. I. Session 1881/82,1, Berlin 1882, p.1ff., www.reichstagsprotokolle.de/ Blatt3_k5_bsb00018436_00051.html [5.06.2014].
• Reinhart C.M., Rogoff K.S., 2010, Growth in a Time of Debt, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 15639.
• Röpke W., 1956/2009, Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage. Die Marktwirtschaft ist nicht alles, in: H.J. Henneck (ed.), Marktwirtschaft ist nicht genug. Gesammelte Aufsätze, Waltrop - Leipzig: Manuscriptum Verlag, 303-314.
• Rüstow A., 1957, Ortsbestimmungen der Gegenwart, Vol. 3, Erlenbach - Zürich: Rentsch.
• Soytas U., Sari R., 2009, Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member, Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 6: 1667-1675.
• Shklar J., 1987, Political Theory and the Rule of Law, in: A.C. Hutchinson, P. Monaha (eds.), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology I, Toronto: Carswell.
• Thurik R., 2007, Entrprenomics: Entrepreneurship, economic growth and policy, prepared for: D.B. Audretsch, R. Strom (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, New York.
• Van Steel A., Carree M., Thurik R., 2005, The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth, Max Planck Institut Jena, Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, Discussion Paper No. 0405.
• Van Suntum U., Böhm T., Oelgemöller J., Ilgmann C., 2012, Defining a modern version of the Social Market Economy, in: Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.), Index of Modern Social Market Economy. Explorative Study, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 9-30.
• Von Weizsäcker C.C., 2006, Soziale Marktwirtschaft als Utopie oder: Zeit und Gerechtigkeit, in: B. Sitter-Liver (ed.), Utopie heute I. Zur aktuellen Bedeutung, Funktion und Kritik des utopischen Denkens und Vorstellens, 23. Und 24. Kolloquium (2005 und 2006) der Schweizerischen Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 153-181.
• Weingast B., 1995, The Economic Rule of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development, Journal of Law, Economic, and Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1: 1-31.
• Weiss K.G., 1996, Wahrheit und Wirklichkeit. Der Weg aus den Weltkriegen in die Soziale Marktwirtschaft und eine künftige Weltordnung, Homburg: Emer.
• Williamson O.E., 1971, The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations, American Economic Review, Vol. 61, No. 2: 112-123.
• Zywicki T.J., 2003, The Rule of Law. Freedom, Prosperity, Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 10: 1-26.