Urban Ecosystem Services - Assessment of Potential at the Different Spatial Scale: an Example of Poznań

• Autorzy: Iwona Zwierzchowska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is the mapping and assessment of ES potential in the scale of the city and identification of site-specific elements that support or reduce the ES potential at the site scale. For this purpose, a multi-criteria spatial analysis, mapping and field vision were conducted. The results showed urban areas with the lowest ES potential that are also characterized by the highest population density. At the site scale, land cover and land-use types with other anthropogenic elements that affect the ES potential and flow were identified. The results can be used to support the transformation process of the city toward nature-based solutions. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Multicriteria analysis; City; Ecosystem; Services

PL

Analiza wielokryterialna; Miasto; Ekosystem; Usługi

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 1 (60)
• Strony: 207--225

Twórcy

autor

Iwona Zwierzchowska

• niwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Baró F. et al. (2015), Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities, "Ecological indicators" No. 55, p. 146-158.
• Beim M., Tölle A. (2008), Motywacje migracji rezydencjalnych w obszarze aglomeracji poznańskiej, in: Kaczmarek T., Mizgajski (eds) A., Powiat poznański., Jakość przestrzeni i jakość życia, Poznań, p. 121-138.
• Bolund P., Hunhammar S. (1999), Ecosystem services in urban areas, "Ecological Economics" No. 29, p. 293-301.
• Borowski J., Pstrągowska M. (2015), Rośliny drzewiaste w osiedlach mieszkaniowych, in: Szulczewska B. (ed.), Osiedle mieszkaniowe w strukturze przyrodniczej miasta, Warszawa, p. 109-121.
• Burkhard B. et al. (2014), Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands - Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification, "Landscape Online" No. 34, p. 1-32.
• Central Statistical Office of Poland (2015), Population by place of residence, Local Data Bank.
• Centrum Badań Metropolitalnych (2012), Aglomeracja poznańska - obraz demograficzny, Poznań.
• Czerwieniec M., Lewińska J. (1996), Zieleń w mieście, Warszawa.
• European Union (2011), Mapping guide for a European Urban Atlas, p. 1-30.
• Gibbons A.C., James C. (1996), Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator, "Journal of the American Planning Association" No. 62(2), p. 243-258.
• Gómez-Baghettum E., Barton D.N. (2013), Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning, "Ecological Economics" No. 86, p. 235-245.
• Hasse D. et al. (2014), A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation, "AMBIO" No. 43, p. 413-433.
• Holt A.R. et al. (2015), Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem service, "Ecosystem Services" No. 16, p. 33-46.
• Januchta-Szostak A. (2012), Usługi ekosystemów wodnych w miastach, "Zrównoważony Rozwój - Zastosowania. Przyroda w mieście" No. 3, p. 91-110.
• Kabisch N. et al. (2016), Nature-based solution to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action, "Ecology and Society" No. 21, art. No. 39.
• Kaczmarek T., Łodyga B. (2012), Demografia, in: Kaczmarek T. (ed.), Studium uwarunkowań rozwoju przestrzennego aglomeracji poznańskiej, Poznań, p. 32-43.
• Kremer P. et al. (2016), The value of urban ecosystem services in New York City: A spatially explicit multicriteria analysis of landscape scale valuation scenarios, "Environmental Science & Policy" No. 62, p. 57-68.
• Langemeyer J. et al. (2016), Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), "Environmental Science & Policy" No. 62, p. 45-56.
• Majkowska A. et al. (2016), The urban heat island in the city of Poznań as derived from Landsat 5 TM, "Theoretical and Applied Climatology", p. 1-15.
• Mizgajski A., Zwierzchowska I. (2015), Sterowanie rozwojem aglomeracji i planowanie strategiczne rozwoju miast z punktu widzenia adaptacji do zmian klimatu, in: Kalinowska A. (ed.), Miasto idealne - Miasto zrównoważone. Planowanie przestrzenne terenów zurbanizowanych i jego wpływ na ograniczenie skutków zmian klimatu, Warszawa, p. 127-133.
• Mizgajski A. et al. (2015), Urban MAES - usługi ekosystemowe na obszarach zurbanizowanych. Study ordered by the Ministry of the Environment in accordance with Agreement no. DLP/4/2015 dated 23 March, Poznań.
• Paracchini M.L. et al. (2014), Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU, "Ecological Indicators" No. 45, p. 371-385.
• Sarkki S. et al. (2016), Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance, "Regional Environmental Change" No. 16(7), p. 2019-2032.
• Stępniewska M. (2016), Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making, "Clean Soil Air Water" No. 44, p. 1414-1422.
• Szulczewska B. et al. (2014), How much green is needed for a vital neighbourhood? In search for empirical evidence, "Land Use Policy" No. 38, p. 330-345.
• Wurster D., Artmann M. (2014), Development of a Concept for Non-monetary Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services at the Site Level, "AMBIO" No. 43, p. 454-465.
• UN (2014), World Urbanization Prospects. The 2014 Revision. Highlights, New York, p. 1-27.