Exploration Knowledge Sharing Networks Using Social Network Analysis Methods

• Autorzy: Győző Attila Szilágyi
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Knowledge sharing within organization is one of the key factor for success. The organization, where knowledge sharing takes place faster and more efficiently, is able to adapt to changes in the market environment more successfully, and as a result, it may obtain a competitive advantage. Knowledge sharing in an organization is carried out through formal and informal human communication contacts during work. This forms a multi-level complex network whose quantitative and topological characteristics largely determine how quickly and to what extent the knowledge travels within organization. The study presents how different networks of knowledge sharing in the organization can be explored by means of network analysis methods through a case study, and which role play the properties of these networks in fast and sufficient spread of knowledge in organizations. The study also demonstrates the practical applications of our research results. Namely, on the basis of knowledge sharing educational strategies can be developed in an organization, and further, competitiveness of an organization may increase due to those strategies' application. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Knowledge sharing; Social networking; Social Network Analysis (SNA); Network analysis

PL

Dzielenie się wiedzą; Serwisy społecznościowe; Analiza sieci społecznych; Analiza sieciowa

• Czasopismo: Economics & Sociology
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 10
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 179--191

Twórcy

autor

Győző Attila Szilágyi

• Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

Bibliografia

• Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applies Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
• Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A. L. (2000). Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks. Nature, 406, 378-381.
• Barabási, A. L. Albert, R., Jeong, H., Bianconi, G. (2000). Power-law distribution of the world wide web. Science, 287(5461), 2115.
• Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked, The New Science of Network. Cambridge, Perseus Publishing.
• Barabási, A. L. (2016). Network Science. Boston, Northeastern University.
• Bierly, B. E., Kessler, E. H, Christensen, E. W. (2000). Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(6), 595-618.
• Blanchard, K. (2010). Leading at a Higher Level. New Jersey, Blanchard Management Corporation.
• Boisot, M. (1995). Information Space. A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. London, Routledge.
• Caldarelli, G. (2007). Scale-Free Networks, Complex Webs in Nature and Technology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Erdős, P., Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs I. Publicationes Mathematica. Debrecen, 6, 290-297.
• Estrada, E. (2011). The Structure of Complex Networks. New York, Oxford University Press.
• Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management. Pitman, London, Reprint 2013 by Martino Fine Books, Las Vegas USA.
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Straus and Giroux, New York.
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
• Handy, C. (1995). The Empty Raincoat. New York, Arrow Books Limited.
• Handy, C. (2001). The Elephant and the Flea. Looking Backward to the Future. London, Hutchinson.
• Handy, C. B. (1984). Understanding Organizations. London, Penguin.
• Harford, T. (2011). Adapt: Why Success Always Stars with Failure. New York, Farra, Strauss and Giroux.
• Jennex, M. E. (2008). Current Issues in Knowledge Management. Information Science Reference, New York, Hersey.
• Jennex, M.E. (2009). Knowledge Management, Organizational Memory, and Transfer Behavior: Global Approaches and Advancements. New York, Hershey.
• Juran, J. M. (1998). Juran's Quality Book. New York, McGraw-Hill.
• Langfred, C. W., Rockmann, K. W. (2016). The Push and Pull of Autonomy: The Tension Between Individual Autonomy and Organizational Control in Knowledge Work. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 629-657.
• Lazányi, K. (2016a). A biztonsági kultúra szerepe a vezetői döntések támogatásában. Taylor: Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományi Folyóirat: a Virtuális Intézet Közép-Európa Kutatására Közleményei, 8(1), 143-150.
• Lazányi, K. (2016b). Who do You Trust? - Safety Aspect of Interpersonal Trust among Young Adults with Work Experience. In: Szakál Anikó (Ed.). Proceedings of the11th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, SACI 2016, 412.
• Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic, Nonperiodic Flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141.
• Mayeda, W. (1972). Graph Theory. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Mérei, F. (1988). Közösségek rejtett hálózata. Budapest, Tömegkommunikációs Kutatóközpont.
• Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari. A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York, The Free Press.
• Newman, M., Barabási, A. L., Watts, D. J. (2006). The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
• Newman, M. E. J., Watts, D. J. (1999). Renormalization group analysis of the small-world network model. Physics Letter A., 263(4-6), 341-346.
• Nonaka, I., Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of "Ba": Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California, California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
• Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York, Oxford University Press.
• PMBOK Guide (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body for Knowledge. Pennsylvania, USA, Project Management Institute, 22.
• Polányi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & Kegan.
• Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., Nielsen, P. (2016). What Factors Influence Knowledge Sharing in Organizations?: A Social Dilemma Perspective of Social Media Communication. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1225-1246.
• Simon, H. (1982). A vezetői döntés új tudománya. Budapest, Statisztikai Kiadó Vállalat.
• Szaboszlai, V., Velencei, J., Baracskai, Z. (2014). Post-Experiental Education: from Knowledge to Knowing. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(10), 235-247.
• Szeghegyi, Á. (2011). A tudásmenedzsment stratégiai szerepe a vállalatoknál. In: Nagy Imre Zoltán (Ed.). Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században: tanulmánykötet. Budapest, Óbudai Egyetem Keleti Károly Gazdasági Kar, 53-68.
• Tryon, Jr. C.a. (2012). Managing Organizational Knowledge, 3rd Generation Knowledge Management ... and Beyond. London, CRC Press.
• Velencei, J. (2012). E-Coaching Trough Knowledge Platfrom. In: Kadocsa, Gy (Ed.). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking. Budapest, Óbuda University, 235-242.
• Velencei, J., Baracskai, Z. (2016). Knowledge Management Initiatives and Strategies in Small and Medium Enterprises. In: Bencsik, A.(Ed.). Decision Maker in the Global Village: Thinking Together. Hersey, IGI Global, pp. 25-41.
• Velencei, J. (2014). Embervezényelt folyamatok: a tudásmegosztók fukarsága. Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században IV. Tanulmánykötet. Óbudai Egyetem, pp. 337-346.
• Verzuh, E. (2005). The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management. New Jersey, Hoboken, Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Wang, X.F., Chen, G. (2002). Synchronization in Scale-free Dynamical Networks: Robustness and Fragility. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 49(1), 54-62.
• Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, Cambridge University Press.
• Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective Dynamics of Small-world Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-3/13