The behavioral preferences of leaders and team performance - the notions of 'neuroleader' and 'neuroorganisation'

• Autorzy: Anna Korzeniewska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the interactions between behavioral preferences of a leader and the factors of a high-performance team. A total of 476 interactions were identified using a cross-impact matrix featuring the behavioral factors of the leader and 25 factorial factors. On this basis, the most useful features of the leader are identified and the definitions of neuroleader and neuroorganization developed. Interacted studies have shown that the neuroleader leading the organization toward neuroorganization prefers behavior that is characteristic for people who are particularly developed in the right hemisphere (blue and green, in PRISM terminology). The article presents the characteristics of "blue" and "green" leaders. The results of the present research may provide an introduction to a broader study of the influence of behavioral characteristics on team performance. It would be revealing to conduct research on a larger number of companies in order to find correlations between high team performance and the behavioral preferences of team members and leaders. The author want to take up these questions in further research on high performance in neuroscience. These studies will enhance the knowledge of management, decision making and human behavior in teams and organizations. Key words: neuroleader, neuroorganization, team performance, high performance, performance management (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management; Labour efficiency; Team leader; Behaviourism

PL

Zarządzanie; Wydajność pracy; Lider w grupie; Behawioryzm

• Czasopismo: Annals of Marketing Management & Economics
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 3
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 31--39

Twórcy

autor

Anna Korzeniewska

• University of Applied Sciences in Wałcz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Chong E., 2007. Role balance and team development: A study of team role characteristics underlying high and low performing teams, Institute of Behavioural and Applied Management.
• Katzenbach J.R., Smith D.K., 1993. The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High Performance Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Korzeniewska A., Wierzchowska K., 2016. Performance measurement and high team performance building using the Prism Team Performance Diagnostic, "Annals of Marketing Management & Economics" 2 (2), 73-88.
• Loew L., 2015. Performance Management 2015: Coaching for Development Needed. Brandon Hall Group.
• Mitchell R., Boyle B., Parker V., Giles M., Chiang V., Joyce P., 2015. Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity," Human Resource Managemen"t 54 (2), 217-239.
• Mlodinow L., 2016. Nieświadomy mózg. Jak to, co dzieje się za progiem świadomości, wpływa na nasze życie, Pruszyński i Spółka, Warszawa.
• Rock D., 2016. How to Use Neuroscience to Frame Your Company's Response to the Election,Organizations & People, retrieved from http://www.strategy-business.com/article/Howto- Use-Neuroscience-to-Frame-Your-Companys-Response-to-the-Election?gko=e6b2b.
• Sui Y., Wang H., Kirkman B.L., Li N., 2016. Understanding the curvilinear relationship between LMX differentiation and team coordination and performance, "Personnel Psychology" 69, 559-597.
• Waal de A., Mooijman E., Fermentf M., 2015. From Crisis to All-Time High Performance: Using the HPO Framework to Improve Customer Relations at Ziggo, "Global Business and Organizational Excellence "34 (2), 6-18.
• Waal de A., Hanna D., 2016. HPO Model + HPO Framework = Organizational Improvement for a European Multinational, Global Business and Organizational Excellence 35 (5), 30-43.