PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 71 Modeling of Logistic Processes and Systems | 7--17
Tytuł artykułu

Teleological Assumptions in the Process of Identification and Evaluation of Best Logistics Practices

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Problem of identification and evaluation of best logistics practices is not a new one, however it still causes a controversy on the methods of logistics practices assessment. Thus, the authors, based on the literature review, case study and their long experience at the area of logistics research decided to put under the readers critique their conception of teleological assumptions, based on 5R logistics aims (objectives, purposes) criteria, which can be used for the process of identification and evaluation of best logistics practices. The added value of this conception is expressed at a thesis (and developed at this paper) that the set of logistics aims can be understood, specified, or even parameterized, only in relation to the primary process (production, trade, service), which determines the right resource, the right quantity, the right location, the right time and the right cost (5R) towards its logistics support process. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • University of Gdansk, Poland
  • University of Gdansk, Poland
Bibliografia
  • AGCO (2017), AGCO Smart Logistics Closes Digital Gap Receives European Gold Medal in Logistics and Supply Chain. News Release, AGCO. Available from http://elalog.eu/sites/default/files/focus/20170518_Website_ELA_winner_AGCO_4flow.docx [Accessed 7 June 2017].
  • BestLog (2017), Bestlog. Logistics Best Practice, Transport Research & Innovation Portal. Available from http://www.transport-research.info/project/logistics-best-practice [Accessed 6 June 2017].
  • Case studies (2017), European Platform for Supply Chain Management Best Practice. Available from http://www.elabestlog.org/cases [Accessed 6 June 2017].
  • Cetinkaya, B. et al. (2011), Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Practical Ideas for Moving Towards Best Practice, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin - Heidelberg.
  • Chaberek, M. (2002), Makro- i mikroekonomiczne aspekty wsparcia logistycznego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, p. 11.
  • Chaberek, M. (2006), Funkcje logistyki w stymulacji porządku systemów gospodarczych, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Ekonomika Transportu Lądowego, 32, pp. 13-21.
  • Chaberek, M. (2014), Theoretical, Regulatory and Practical Implications of Logistics, LogForum, 10(1), pp. 3-12.
  • Chaberek, M. and Karwacka, G. (2009), Logistyka jako praktyczne urzeczywistnienie prakseologicznych zasad dobrej roboty, Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Ekonomia XXXIX - Nauki Ekonomiczno-Społeczne, 391, pp. 7-17.
  • Elabestlog (2017), European Platform for Supply Chain Management Best Practice. Available from http://www.elabestlog.org [Accessed 6 June 2017].
  • Gammelgaard, B. (2004), Schools in logistics research? A methodological framework for analysis of the discipline, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(6), pp. 479-491.
  • Hajduk, Z. (2008), Nauka a wartość, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin.
  • Hart, S.L. (1971), Axiology - theory of values, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 32(1), pp. 29-41.
  • Lee, H.L. (2004), The triple-A supply chain, Harvard Business Review, 82(10), pp. 102-112.
  • Leśkiewicz, Z. (1994), Racjonalność w ekonomii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin, p. 22.
  • Mankowski, C. (2016), Identification of Key Axiology Assumptions in Logistics, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Ekonomika Transportu i Logistyka. Modelowanie Procesów i Systemów Logistycznych, 58, pp. 25-36.
  • Mejías, A.M., Paz, E. and Pardo, J.E. (2016), Efficiency and sustainability through the best practices in the Logistics Social Responsibility framework, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 36(2), pp. 164-199.
  • Piotrowicz, W., Cuthbertson, R. and Islei, G. (2007), Sustainable Supply Chains - a framework for best practice assessment Results of the pilot study, BestLog project, Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Energy, Environment, Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, Agios Nikolaos, Greece, July 24-26, pp. 456-465. Available from http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/754/1/Piotrowicz_Cuthbertson_Islei_WSEAS_Conference_Publication.pdf [Accessed 7 June 2017].
  • Stadtler, H. and Kilger, Ch. (Eds.) (2008), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg, p. 41.
  • Svensson, G. (2010), Teleological approaches in supply chain management: Illustrations, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(1), pp. 16-20.
  • Tokarski, J. (Ed.) (1980), Słownik wyrazów obcych, PWN, Warszawa, p. 751.
  • Turek, M. (2004), O nowe rozumienie racjonalności w logistyce, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Ekonomika Transportu i Logistyka. Modelowanie Procesów i Systemów Logistycznych, 28, pp. 77-94.
  • Zhao, D., Su-Hui Kuo, S.-H. and Wang, T.-C. (2016), Constructing the best supply chain proces model of logistics for Free Trade Port Zone, 3rd International Conference on Management, Education Technology and Sports Science (METSS 2016), pp. 473-477. Available from http://www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=25862976 [Accessed 2 June 2017].
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171507182

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.