Multicriteria Assessment of the Academic Research Activity

• Autorzy: Dorota Kuchta , Radosław Ryńca , Yasmin Ziaeian , Adam Grudziński
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper a network DEA approach to deal with efficiency assessment will be presented and applied to the assessment of performance of members of an academic faculty of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology. The purpose of this study is to propose a solution to the problem of multicriteria assessment of faculty members at universities, discussing at the same time its advantages and disadvantages in the context of the higher educational system in Poland.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Scientific staff; Employee appraisal; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Higher education

PL

Kadry naukowe; Ocena pracowników; Metoda DEA (analiza obwiedni danych); Szkolnictwo wyższe

• Czasopismo: Multiple Criteria Decision Making / University of Economics in Katowice
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 12
• Strony: 103--118

Twórcy

autor

Dorota Kuchta

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

autor

Radosław Ryńca

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

autor

Yasmin Ziaeian

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

autor

Adam Grudziński

• Wrocław University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• Athanassopoulos A.D., Shale E. (1997), Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis, Educ. Econ, 5, 117-134.
• Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
• Cropper P., Cook R. (2000), Activity-Based Costing in Universities - Five Years On, Public Money & Management, 20, 61-68.
• Despotis D.K., Koronakos G., Sotiros D. (2015), A Multi-objective Programming Approach to Network DEA with an Application to the Assessment of the Academic Research Activity, Procedia Computer Science, 55, 370-379.
• Despotis D.K., Sotiros D., Koronakos G. (2016), A Network DEA Approach for Series Multi-stage Processes, Omega, 61, 35-48.
• Ghinolfi D., El Baz H.G., Borgonovin E., Radwan A., Laurence O., Sayed H.A., De Simone P., Abdelwadoud M., Stefani A., Botros S.S., Filipponi F. (2014), A Model for Southern Mediterranean Research Institute Self-assessment: A SWOT Analysis-based Approach to Promote Capacity Building at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute in Cairo (Egypt), Arab Journal of Gastroenterology, 15(3-4), 92-97.
• Hicks D. (2012), Performance-based University Research Funding Systems, Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261.
• Kuchta D., Skorupka D., Duchaczek D., Kowacka M. (2016), Modified, Stakeholders Perspective Based DEA Approach in IT and R&D Project Ranking, ICEIS 2016: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Rome, Italy, 25-28 April 2016, S. Hammoudi (ed.), 2, 158-165.
• Lee B.L. (2011), Efficiency of Research Performance of Australian Universities: A Reappraisal Using a Bootstrap Truncated Regression Approach, Economic Analysis and Policy, 41(3), 195-203.
• Lee B.L., Worthington A.C. (2016), A Network DEA Quantity and Quality-orientated Production Model: An Application to Australian University Research Services, Omega, 60, 26-33.
• Meng W., Zhang D., Qi L., Liu W. (2008), Two-level DEA Approaches in Research Evaluation, Omega, 36, 6, 950-957.
• Retzer V., Jurasinski G. (2009), Towards Objectivity in Research Evaluation Using Bibliometric Indicators - A Protocol for Incorporating Complexity, Basic and Applied Ecology, 10(5), 393-400.
• Vanclay J.K. (2011), An Evaluation of the Australian Research Council's Journal Ranking, Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 265-274.
• Woelert P. (2015), The 'Logic of Escalation' in Performance Measurement: An Analysis of the Dynamics of a Research Evaluation System, Policy and Society, 34(1), 75-85.
• (www 1) http://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/c.php?g=169983&p=1119054 (access: 13.05.2017).
• (www 2) http://www.bg.pw.edu.pl/index.php/en/indicators-for-journals-evaluation

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22367/mcdm.2017.12.08