Uwarunkowania instytucjonalne współpracy międzygminnej w wybranych krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej - znaczenie wielkości gminy

• Autorzy: Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz

Warianty tytułu

Institutional Conditions of Inter-municipal Cooperation in Selected Central and Eastern European Countries - Importance of the Municipality Size

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule analizie poddane zostały dwa zjawiska: stopnień fragmentacji terytorialnej oraz rozwiązania instytucjonalne dotyczące współpracy międzygminnej. Jego celem jest identyfikacja wpływu wielkości gminy na rozwiązania instytucjonalne współdziałania międzygminnego w wybranych krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The article analyses the relationship between municipality size, legal regulations and its choice of instruments for inter-municipal cooperation. The analysis concentrates on two issues, namely the territorial fragmentation and territorial consolidation in selected Central and Eastern European countries and cooperation among local governments. The research results show the municipality size and the instruments used for inter-municipal cooperation to be not related to each other. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Gmina; Współpraca międzygminna

EN

District; Commune cooperation

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: t. 18, z. 11, cz. 1 Zarządzanie w samorządzie terytorialnym
• Strony: 133--149

Twórcy

autor

Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• Balázs I., Hoffman I. (2017), Can (Re)Centralization Be A Modern Governance In Rural areas?, "Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences", nr 50, ss. 5-20.
• Bel G., Fageda X., Mur M. (2013), Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis, "Local Government Studies", vol. 39, nr 2, ss. 435-454.
• Bel G., Fageda X., Mur M. (2014), Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 24, nr 1, ss. 85-107.
• Bel G., Fageda X., Warner M.E. (2010), Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper Than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services, "Journal of Policy Analysis and Management", vol. 29, nr 3, ss. 553-577.
• Bel G., Warner M.E. (2016), Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: a meta-regression analysis, "Journal of Economic Policy Reform", vol. 19, nr 2, ss. 91-115.
• Bel G., Warner M.E. (2015), Inter-Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence, "Public Administration", vol. 93, nr 1, ss. 52-67.
• Bolgherini S. (2011), Local government and inter-municipal cooperation in Italy and Germany, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Giessen.
• Brown T.L., Potoski M. (2003), Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 13, nr 4, ss. 441-468.
• Caperchione E., Zuffada E. (2003), The Inter-related Roles of the Regional and Local Government in Developing Local Partnerships in Italy, "SDA Bocconi Research Division Working Paper", nr 03-94, ss. 1-24.
• Carr J.B., Feiock R.C. (2004), City-County Consolidation and Its Alternatives: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape, M.E. Sharpe, New York.
• Council of Europe (1998a), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in France, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1998b), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Malta, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1998c), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Portugal, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1998d), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Spain, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1999a), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Netherlands, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1999b), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Germany, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1999c), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Latvia, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (1999d), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in the Slovak Republic, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (2000a), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in the United Kingdom, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (2000b), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Austria, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (2000c), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Poland, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (2000d), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy in Italy, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council of Europe (2002), Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy - Czech Republic, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Council Of Europe (2007), Good practices in intermunicipal co-operation in Europe, Member of the scientific council of the association EUROPA. Situation in 2007, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
• Fedele M., Moini G. (2007), Italy: The Changing Boundaries of Inter-municipal Cooperation [w:] R. Hulst, A. van Montfort (red.), Intermunicipal Cooperation in Europe, Springer, Dordrecht.
• Feiock R.C. (2007), Rational choice and regional governance, "Journal of Urban Affairs", vol. 29, ss. 47-63.
• Feiock R.C. (2013), The institutional collective action framework, "Policy Studies Journal", vol. 41, ss. 397-425.
• Franzke J., Klimovský D., Pinterič U. (2016), Does Inter-Municipal Cooparation Lead to Territorial Consolidation? A Comparative Analysis of Selected European Cases in Times of Crisis [w:] S. Kuhlmann, G. Bouckaert (red.), Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Hefetz A., Warner M.E. (2012), Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", vol. 22, ss. 289-317.
• Hefetz A., Warner M.E., Vigoda-Gadot E. (2012), Privatization and intermunicipal contracting: The US local government experience 1992-2007, "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy", vol. 30, ss. 675-692.
• Hefetz A., Warner M.E., Vigoda-Gadot E. (2015), Professional management and local government service delivery: Strategic decisions across alternative markets, "Public Performance & Management Review", vol. 38, nr 2, ss. 261-283.
• Hulst R., van Montfort A. (2012), Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national context, "Public Policy and Administration", vol. 27, nr 2, ss. 121-144.
• Hulst R., van Montfort A., Haveri A., Airaksinen J., Kelly J. (2009), Institutional shifts in intermunicipal service delivery, "Public Organization Review", vol. 9, ss. 263-285.
• Joassart-Marcelli P., Musso J. (2005), Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area, "Urban Affairs Review", vol. 40, nr 4, ss. 492-519.
• Levin J., Tadelis S. (2010), Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities, "The Journal of Industrial Economics", vol. 58, nr 3, ss. 507-541.
• Mohr R., Deller S.C., Halstead J.M. (2010), Alternative methods of service delivery in small and rural municipalities, "Public Administration Review", vol. 70, nr 6, ss. 894-905.
• Nemec J., Matejova L., Soucopova J. (2016), "Small is beautiful": The Pros and Cons of Territorial Fragmentation Regarding the Example of the Czech Republic [w:] U. Sadioglu, D Kadir (red.), Comparative Studies and Regionally-Focused Cases Examining Local Governments, IGI Global, Hershey.
• Ostrom V., Tiebout C.M., Warren R. (1961), The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry, "The American Political Science Review", vol. 55, nr. 4, ss. 831-842.
• Peteri G. (2005), Municipal co-operation and co-financing of local government activities in Hungary, "Annuaire des Collectivités", Locales Groupement des Recherches sur l' Administration Locale en Europe, GRALE, Paris.
• Podgórniak-Krzykacz A. (2016), Analiza wykorzystania form prawno-organizacyjnych współpracy międzysamorządowej w gminach - porównania międzyregionalne [w:] J. Przywojska, I. Warwas (red.), Innowacje w zarządzaniu publicznym i polityce społecznej, "Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie", t. XVII, z. 4, cz. II, Łódź-Warszawa.
• Sedmihradská L. (2011), Voluntary Municipal Associations in the Czech Republic: Unfulfilled Expectations? [w:] P. Swianiewicz (red.), Working Together, Intermunicipal Cooperation in Five Central European Countries, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Foundations, Budapest.
• Stănuş C. (2011), Fine-Tuning Intermunicipal Cooperation Policy in Romania, [w:] P. Swianiewicz (red.), Working Together, Intermunicipal Cooperation in Five Central European Countries, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Foundations, Budapest.
• Swianiewicz P., A. Gendźwiłł, J. Krukowska, M. Lackowska, A. Picej (2016), Współpraca międzygminna w Polsce. Związek z rozsądku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
• Tavares A.F., Camões P.J., (2007), Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transactioncosts framework, "Local Government Studies", vol. 33, nr 4, ss. 535-553.
• Thurmaier K., Wood C. (2004), Interlocal agreements as an alternative to consolidation, [w:] J.B. Carr, R. Feiock (red.), City-county consolidation and its alternatives. Reshaping the local government landscape, M.E. Sharpe, New York.
• Warner M.E. (2006), Inter-municipal cooperation in the U.S.: A Regional Governance Solution?, "Urban Public Economics Review", vol. 6, ss. 132-151.
• Warner M.E., Hefetz A. (2002), Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, Equity and Voice, "Urban Affairs Review", vol. 38, nr 1, ss. 70-89.
• Warner M.E., Hefetz A. (2003), Rural-urban differences in privatization: limits to the competitive state, "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy", vol. 21, ss. 703-718.
• Wojciechowski E., Podgórniak-Krzykacz A., Kalisiak-Mędelska M., Chądzyński J. (2014), Władza lokalna a państwo społeczeństwo i rynek. Współpraca i konkurencja, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.
• Wood C. (2006), Scope and patterns of metropolitan governance in urban America: Probing the complexities in the Kansas City region, "American Review of Public Administration", vol. 36, ss. 337-353.
• Zafra-Gómez, J.L., Prior D., Díaz A.M.P., López-Hernández A.M. (2013), Reducing Costs in Times of Crisis: Delivery Forms in Small and Medium Sized Local Governments Waste Management Services, "Public Administration", vol. 91, nr 1, ss. 51-68.
• Eurostat (2016), Correspondence table LAU 2 - NUTS 2013, EU-28, [online], http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/local-administrative-units, dostęp: 15 czerwca 2017.
• Labounková V. (2008), Monitoring mikroregionů a jejich rozvojových dokumentů (Monitoring of microregions and of their development documents), Ústav územního rozvoje, Brno, [online], http://www.uur.cz/images/uzemnirozvoj/regionalnipolitika/Mikroregiony/, dostęp: 15 sierpnia 2017.
• Šelešovský J., Častek O. (2004), Empirické šetření názorů obcí a měst na současné ekonomické formy sdružování samosprávných celků (Empirical survey of opinions of municipalities and towns on current economic forms of local government formations), [online], http://www.mvcr.cz/odbor/reforma/pdf_opti/e_pril_1.pdf, dostęp: 10 sierpnia 2017.
• UNDP (2010), Toolkit Manual - Inter-Municipal Cooperation, [online], www.municipal-cooperation.org, dostęp: 20 czerwca 2017.