An experiment on temptation and attitude towards paternalism

• Autorzy: Michał Krawczyk , Łukasz Woźny
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this project we investigate experimentally the link between self-control and attitude towards paternalism in a principal-agent framework. This allows us to distinguish between models of costly self-control and models of time inconsistency, which often make identical predictions in other contexts. We invite our subjects for a free lunch: a burger or a turkey. We verify in a pre-test that the burger is considered (much) more tasty and tempting, while the turkey is seen as healthier. In the experiment proper we observe incentivized choices of four types: what menus (must eat burger; must eat turkey; your choice: burger or turkey) subjects assign to another; how they reward each of these menu choices yet another participant made for them; which of the two dishes they pick on the spot (if given the choice); whether they want to pre-commit to a choice of dish for a future session. Similarly to some recent experimental results we find a significant fraction of subjects willing to selfcommit. We also observe non-trivial sets of individuals who reward highly a restricted choice and paternalistically restrict other's choice. Moreover, there is a strong link between these three tendencies, suggesting a common thread underlying the use of commitment devices and paternalistic behavior as well as approval thereof in environments involving temptations. These findings are consistent with the models of costly self-control rather than time inconsistency. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Models of choice; Social attitudes; Paternalism

PL

Modele wyboru; Postawy społeczne; Paternalizm

• Czasopismo: Collegium of Economic Analysis SGH - Working Papers
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 18
• Strony: 34

Twórcy

autor

Michał Krawczyk

• University of Warsaw

autor

Łukasz Woźny

• Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adams, A., L. Cherchye, B. De Rock, Verriest, E. (2014): Consume now or later? Time inconsistency, collective choice, and revealed preference, "American Economic Review", 104, 4147-4183.
• Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., and Yin, W. (2006): Tying Odysseus to the mast: evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", 121(2), 635-672.
• Augenblick, N., Niederle, M. and Sprenger, C. (2015): Working over time: dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", 130, 1067-1115.
• Bąk, W., Mielniczuk, E., Oleś, P. K., Purc, E., and Łaguna, M. (2014): Short measure of personality TIPIP in a Polish sample, "Roczniki Psychologiczne", 17(2), 421-437.
• Bitterly, T. B., Mislavsky, R., Dai, H., and Milkman, K. L. (2014): Dueling with desire: a synthesis of past research on want/should conflict, in: W. Hofmann, L. Nordgren (eds.) Psychology of Desire.
• Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A. (2015): Dysfunction of self-regulation and self-control in Facebook addiction. "Psychiatric Quarterly", 1-8.
• Bucciol, A. (2012): Measuring self-control problems: a structural estimation, "Journal of the European Economic Association", 10(5), 1084-1115.
• Caplin, A., Leahy, J. (2006): The recursive approach to time inconsistency, "Journal of Economic Theory", 131(1), 134-156.
• Casari, M., Luini, L. (2009): Cooperation under alternative punishment institutions: an experiment, "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization", 71(2), 273-282.
• Cox, J.C., D. Friedman, Gjerstad, S. (2007): A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness, "Games and Economic Behavior", 59(1), 17-45.
• Dekel, E., Lipman, B. L. (2012): Costly self-control and random self-indulgence, "Econometrica", 80(3), 1271-1302.
• Dekel, E., B. L. Lipman, and Rustichini, A. (2001): Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space, "Econometrica", 69(4), 891-934.
• Dekel, E., B. L. Lipman, Rustichini, A. (2009): Temptation-driven preferences, "Review of Economic Studies", 76(3), 937-971.
• Della Vigna, S., Malmendier, U., (2004): Contract design and self-control: theory and evidence, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", 119 (2), 353-402.
• Dziewulski, P. (2015): Revealed time-preference, University of Oxford, Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, No. 748.
• Echenique, F., T. Imai, Saito, K. (2016): Testable implications of quasi-hyperbolic and exponential discounting, Mimeo.
• Eliaz, K., Spiegler, R., (2006): Contracting with diversely naive agents, "Review of Economic Studies", 73 (3), 689-714.
• Esteban, S., Miyagawa, E., (2006): Temptation, self-control, and competitive nonlinear pricing, "Economic Letters", 90 (3), 348-355.
• Falk, A., Fischbacher, U. (2006): A theory of reciprocity, "Games and Economic Behavior", 54(2), 293-315.
• Fehr, E., Gächter, S. (1998): Reciprocity and economics: the economic implications of homo reciprocans, "European Economic Review", 42(3), 845-859.
• Gilpatric, S.M., (2008): Present-biased preferences, self-awareness and shirking, "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization", 67 (3-4), 735-754.
• Gine X., Goldberg J., Silverman D., Yang D., (2016): Revising commitments: field evidence on the adjustment of prior choices, "Economic Journal", first published online: 25 April 2016, doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12378.
• Gul F., Pesendorfer W., (2001): Temptation and self-control, "Econometrica", 69(6), 1403-1435.
• Gul, F., Pesendorfer, W. (2004): Self-control and the theory of consumption, "Econometrica", 72(1), 119-158.
• Heidhues, P., Koszegi, B., (2009): Futile Attempts at Self-Control, "Journal of the European Economic Association", 7(2-3), 423-434.
• Heidhues, P., Koszegi, B., (2010): Exploiting naivete about self-control in the credit market, "American Economic Review", 100 (5), 2279-2303.
• Janssens, W., Kramer, B. Swart, L. (2015): Be patient when measuring hyperbolic discounting: stationarity, time consistency and time invariance in a field experiment, unpublished manuscript.
• Kataria, M., Levati, M. V., Uhl, M. (2014): Paternalism with hindsight: do protégés react consequentialistically to paternalism? "Social Choice and Welfare", 43(3), 731-746.
• Kopylov, I. (2012): Perfectionism and choice, "Econometrica", 80(5), 1819-1843.
• Le Lec, F., Tarroux, B. (2015): Is more choice always preferred? Experimental evidence. Working Paper.
• Kreps, D. M. (1979): A representation theorem for 'preference for flexibility', "Econometrica, 47(3), 565-577.
• Montiel Olea, J. L., Strzalecki, T. (2014): Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", 129, 1449-1499.
• Nelson, J. P., (2010): Alcohol advertising bans, consumption and control policies in seventeen OECD countries, 1975-2000, "Applied Economics", 42(7), 803-823.
• Noor, J. (2007): Commitment and self-control, "Journal of Economic Theory", 135(1), 1-34.
• O'Donoghue, T., Rabin M., (1999): Doing it now or later, "American Economic Review", 89(1), 103-124.
• Olszewski W., (2011): A model of consumption-dependent temptation, "Theory and Decisions", 70(1), 83-93.
• Peleg B., Yaari, M.E., (1973): On the existence of a consistent course of action when tastes are changing, "Review of Economic Studies", 40(3), 391-401.
• Pedersen, S.K., Koch A.K., Nafziger J., (2014): Who wants paternalism? "Bulletin of Economic Research", 66(S1), S147-S166.
• Pew Research Center (2015): In debate over legalizing marijuana, disagreement over drug's dangers. http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/14/in-debate-over-legalizing-marijuanadisagreement-over-drugs-dangers/
• Phelps, E., Pollak, R. (1968): On second best national savings and game equilibrium growth, "Review of Economic Studies", 35, 195-199.
• Read, D., Van Leeuwen, B. (1998): Predicting hunger: the effects of appetite and delay on choice, "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes", 76(2), 189-205.
• Sarver, T. (2008): Anticipating regret: why fewer options may be better, "Econometrica", 76(2), 263-305.
• Strotz, R. H. (1955-1956): Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, "Review of Economic Studies", 23(3), 165-180.
• Tangney J.P., R.F. Baumeister, et al. (2004): High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success, "Journal of Personality", 72(2), 271-324.
• Toussaert, S. (2014): Connecting commitment to self-control: evidence from a field experiment with participants in a weight loss challenge. Working Paper.
• Toussaert, S. (2015): Eliciting temptation and self-control through menu choices: a lab experiment. Working Paper.
• Woźny Ł. (2015): On incentives, temptation and self-control, "Mathematical Social Sciences", 74, 60-67.
• Yilmaz M., (2013): Repeated moral hazard with a time-inconsistent agent, "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization", 95 (C), 70-89.